President Trump And The Lost Election

President Trump And The Lost Election

by

R.E. Prindle

 

(The book of) Genesis refer(s) back to primitive beliefs held by the Hebrews. For them in fact the human soul was not immortal, and the sole function of religion was to establish privileged relations between humans and God, in order to have as long and happy a life as possible. The dogma of immortality and the soul entered the Jewish religion at a fairly late date and is still subject to debate. During the time of Jesus, only the Pharisees and Essenes accepted it. The origin of the belief can obviously be found in Greek philosophy, which itself has been subject to heavy Eastern influence.

All of this boils down to the problem of evil being extremely simplified in the Bible: Jews faithful to the pact sealed with the Eternal God represent good, while other peoples, as well as Jews who are unfaithful to the covenant, represent evil.

Jean Markale,

The Church Of Mary Magdalene

 

Explaining the Liberal mind is one of the most necessary tasks of our time. They are, in fact, a species of religious faith quite divorced from considerations of reality. Their minds are impervious to reason, seemingly based on a kind of divine revelation.

As a religion they are a species of the Semitic belief system begun by the ancient Hebrews as in the quote from Jean Markale above.

Jean Markale is French of Breton ancestry, a scholar of religious evolution. He has contributed to the religious beliefs surrounding the Celtic myths of King Arthur. As such he has uncovered the core religious beliefs of today’s Liberal faith.

Markale’s understanding of the Jewish myth is as concise and accurate as any I have seen while accurately reflecting my own understanding. He defines an outstanding example of the origin of bigotry. To understand the Jewish fallacy one has to understand their position in the ancient world. According to their literary remains the Hebrews were a savage brutal people exterminating their way from Mesopotamia to Egypt and back to Palestine. Genocide was just their way and they made no excuses about it. Offended because the Amalekites refused them passage through their territory the Jews returned decades later to exterminate them.

At the same time the proto-Jews, the Hebrews, according to their writings, were always a subordinate people even, as they tell it, slaves in Egypt. Once back in Palestine they were in a backwater, flyover place in current Liberal terms, a bunch of Deplorables to quote Hillary Clinton. Then, first the Assyrians came, defeated them and transported the legendary Ten Lost Tribes, who have been reported from every location on earth.

After the Assyrians left the Babylonians came and carted the last two tribes of to Babylon. The captivity is ably portrayed by the biblical writers Isaiah and Ezekiel. While the Jews had grandiose notions of themselves and their temple in Palestine they quickly realized the poverty of their pretenses, both intellectual and material among the stupendous splendors of Babylon. It was then they made the fateful decision to oppose the nations of the Earth by declaring themselves the Selector’s choice anointing themselves as a chosen people to determine good and evil.

As Jean Markale points out, as the chosen people they thought themselves the personification of virtue while all others were the same of evil. Thus Semitism and anti-Semitism came into the world. While tens of thousands of pages have been wasted trying to explain the evil of negating the Jewish will it is explained quite simply and easily as those who are not Jewish. As the Jewish bible says, the Lord will bless those that bless the Jews and curse those who curse them. In other words: two fingers to you Jack.

Born at that time was the idea of good gentiles and bad gentiles. But, when the great Jewish uprising of the first and second centuries occurred when Jews committed incredible massacres in Egypt and Cyprus, the great Jewish sage Simeon Ben Yohai was asked whether the ‘good gentiles’ should be spared the good Rabbi replied: Kill them all. That is, genocide. This is the foundation of modern Liberalism.

In the fifteenth century AD Gutenberg invented movable type and began the mass production of books at relatively affordable prices. Just as an aside, today’s Easton Press has just published a facsimile of Gutenberg’s bible. It is massive. While Easton’s is bound with a cover, Gutenberg’s came not only unbound and no cover but with no pagination. While Gutenberg came up with moveable type he didn’t bother to invent punctuation marks and spacers between words. Not only is the language Latin but the typeface is obscure and difficult to read. So, the page is double columned into two nearly solid black blocks.

A few decades later Tyndale published an English language copy. I haven’t seen that. The upshot of that was that while not universally owned the bible was accessible for independent study. The eye became as potent as the ear; no longer did one have to rely on a reading by a priest.

The result of Gutenberg’s innovation was that an already Judaized mind was even more Judaized and in a location such as East Anglia the Torah became so beloved that the East Anglians quickly adopted the role of the Chosen People. The whole of the Jewish baggage was assumed by the East Anglians. They modeled their lives on the biblical scripture, even adopting the brutality of genocide. Fired up by the spirit of Judaism they killed the English King, Charles I, revolted against the non-chosen people of England and successfully established a Jewish style dictatorship proscribing all but their own beliefs.

At the same time these now bigots began to colonize the North American continent in order to establish a pure theocratic State. Thus the notion of an infallible good people surrounded by evil others. Hillary Clinton in our time was to give them their own designation of Deplorables. The flyover country between the two US coasts filled with Deplorables became a waste land of primitive savages to the Liberal mind.

As derivatives of the Jews, being a Semitic religion, the Liberals naturally became a dependency of the Jews who had in the years around the turn of the twentieth century basically colonized the United States while beginning their ascension as governors and imposing their mores on the ‘anti-Semites,’ the other.

The Jews formed terrorist units like the Anti-Defamation League, the NAACP etc. These units then established norms such as Jews good, anti-Semitism evil; Negroes good, racism evil (and only Whites can be racists). The Liberals then adopted these norms as articles of faith thus forming a coalition of White Liberals, Negroes, Jews and eventually any dissident group such as homosexuals and, even more bizarrely, transsexuals. They then called this coalition, their democracy.

After WWI new technologies for propaganda such as radio, talking moving pictures and eventually TV came into existence the Liberal Coalition succeeded in establishing an authoritarian government reminiscent of George Orwell’s 1984 that through the use of double speak and Political Correctness discredited or silenced anyone not in lock step.

Thus, using the attack on NYC’s Twin Towers, World Trade Center, as a lever, pressure was increased through the Bush and Obama administrations to establish a full fledged dictatorship. Obama using race as a cover brought the plan nearly to fruition. His designated successor Hillary Clinton was poised to spring the trap.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the forum. The designated Republican candidate was another Bush, Jeb Bush from Florida. But the Lib Coalition ignored an improbable corner in which lurked a candidate so incredible that he was the scorned of the scorned. He wasn’t even an impossibility in Lib eyes, he was considered a total political non-entity below serious consideration.

This was the reality TV star and mega real estate builder Donald Trump.

To the Coalition Trump wasn’t even a bad joke, there was nothing remotely funny about him. He was ridiculous. However, in the flush of their success to the end of the Obama occupation the coalition had ignored the increasing resentment of the very people on whose votes they depended. Surrounded by yea sayers they ignored the fact that their following was confined to a few population Liberal Coalition strongholds like NYC and California.

Donald Trump may have seemed like a buffoon, may even have been one, but, if so, he was a savvy buffoon. He brushed Jeb Bush aside. In his campaign he essentially gave up the Liberal population centers and went after voters that not only did the Coalition despise but they actually said so repeatedly over the controlled media of the entire nation. Their candidate, Hillary Clinton, sneered at those voters as deplorable people. The upshot was that Trump won over three thousand counties while Clinton won fewer than sixty. The anomaly was that these fifty plus counties, heavily Liberal, gave Clinton the popular vote but the three thousand plus counties gave Trump the Electoral College and the Presidency.

Trump had cannily formed his own Coalition of many dissident groups from despised and persecuted Christians to, if you can believe this, biker groups. As Jack Johnson’s mother said: He said he would bring home the bacon and he did.

Note: Strange as it may seem the boxer Jack Johnson, the first Negro heavyweight champion, has been all but forgotten. A current singer by the name of Jack Johnson is all a large percentage of the population knows by that name. I refer, of course, to the turn of the twentieth century boxer, Jack Johnson.

So, Trump’s great unforgiveable offence is that like Warren G. Harding in 1920 he has disrupted the Liberal program and threatens severe damage if he is allowed to succeed and place like minded politicians in power for the next twenty years. Just as Liberals were pushing a Communist agenda in 1920 so today they are pushing an agenda of unlimited immigration.

Harding quashed Communist hopes within six months of being elected ruining Lib hope for the twelve years before FDR brought them to influence in 1933. It may take Trump slightly longer to stifle unlimited immigration but he seems in a fair way to do it.

As there are only two ways to stop the Trump Redemption, murder or economic collapse they will probably choose the latter. After nearly a hundred years of mass murder by the various Communist regimes the Liberals seem to be opposed to killing although it was undoubtedly used against Harding. Economic collapse which was used to get Hoover out of office to the incalculable harm of the American people we seem to see the beginning of the use of the tactic against Trump now. As Trump has claimed credit for the rise in the stock market since his election and if it continues through 1918 voters will almost certainly return Republican candidates to congress in that election. It is important for the Libs to sink the market for the year. It matters little how people suffer to the Liberals so long as they can regain power.

The real challenge will be the mid-term elections. If they can fill the Houses with Democrats they will be able to contain and stifle Trump. The danger here is that they will use economic means to scuttle the near certain prosperity Trump’s methods are bringing. The Fed which is completely outside presidential or legislative control can easily shoot the interest rate up, which they have already begun to destroy the stock market and whatever other shenanigans they may have up their sleeves. They will undoubtedly invent sufficient justification for raising the discount rate after twenty years of punishing a certain class of people with a near 0 interest rate.

Remember, the Fed is a private corporation in the hands of certain Jewish banking firms. The Fed is outside government control. The next few months until the ’18 elections are going to be critical. Get the Conservative vote out in ’18.

Advertisements

Shumer Shutdown And Pres. Trump

CFR’s Foreign Affairs Magazine Announces

Trump’s ‘Lucky Year’ Is To End.

By

R.E. Prindle

https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2018-01-20/trumps-lucky-year

The Council On Foreign Relations is finally putting its cards on the table in an article published in its magazine Foreign Affairs. The article was scheduled for the March-April issue but the CFR found it important enough to release it in advance on the internet. Thus the article will be free for one week beginning on 1/20/18. Can it be a coincidence that the article was released on 1/20 on the eve of the Shumer Shutdown of the government?

The article is titled Trump’s Lucky Year: Why The Chaos Can’t Last by Eliot A. Cohen and admits that the Pres.’ first year has been a success but that his ‘luck’ has run out now. The CFR wants a return to the seventy year post-war agenda. The Pres. has upset that agenda and will continue to destroy its foundations and will succeed if allowed to continue in office unobstructed.

The CFR has always gone to great lengths to remove presidents from office who won’t follow their program. The CFR was founded in 1921 to advance the socialistic program of Woodrow Wilson. The first hindrance came when Warren G. Harding was elected in 1920. While he hinted that he might advance Wilson’s program and bring the US into the League of Nations he didn’t follow through.

Under strange circumstances Harding died two years into his presidency. While the conditions of his demise are still undetermined I have no doubts that the CFR removed him. It was believed that Harding’s lackluster VP, Calvin Coolidge, would be easily defeated in 1924. Such did not turn out to be the case and Coolidge lived to pass the presidency on to Herbert Hoover in 1928.

The Federal Reserve had been building toward a stock market crash during what was called the Coolidge Prosperity and six months into the Hoover presidency the Fed pulled the plug plunging the country into twelve years of agonizing economic misery salvaged only by two massive world wars, one in Europe and one in the Pacific, that is, Asia.

‘Lucky’ Trump’s second year bids fair to be as or more successful as he barrels ahead with his own program that negates that of he CFR’s. It would appear that assassination is not to be considered. However the 2018 congressional elections that the CFR imagines will give them an overwhelming majority in both houses would stultify Trump’s presidency placing him in the CFR’s hands. The best that Trump could hope for would be Hoover’s fate.

To achieve this, given the fair omens for the Pres.’ second year they have to follow the Hoover scenario and sabotage what bids to be the Great Trump Prosperity.

Therefore, can it be a coincidence that this article was rushed to advance free publication on the very eve of the Shumer Shutdown of the government? CFR, Cohen written article, Shumer Shutdown. The article had to be planned and written at least two or three weeks before the Shumer Shutdown thus it follows that the Shumer Shutdown was planned as a ploy to scuttle Trump some time ago..

The plan shows how little the CFR, Dems, the Left, care for the welfare of the voters of the United States. The Shumer Shutdown has begun. The Pres. cannot fold and probably the CFR will carry it to great extremes placing the economy in jeopardy not unlike the Great Stock Market Crash of 1929. In fact, the key point of the incipient Great Trump Prosperity has been that startling advance of the stock market. That means that something over 50% of the public that owns securities has already improved their finances considerably and bid fair to improve further. That means that the Pres.’ base has improved considerably. There can be little doubt that substantial numbers of immigrants have invested and benefited so they may be reluctant to give up their gains by not voting Trump in ’18.

Thus, the CFR is willing to risk a stock market crash, one that is almost certain now, while putting in jeopardy the welfare of all the peoples resident in the US and perhaps all the peoples of the world. This is the madness of the CFR.

The Pres. cannot give in without destroying his presidency now and it is possible that the CFR will not in complete contempt of every living US resident, possibly every person in the world.

CFR, Cohen, Shumer Shudown. Those behind this incipient disaster should be clear to all.

The Future Of President Donald Trump

The Future Of President Donald Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Democrats are in a bind. They have a president they despise who if he is allowed to succeed will destroy their whole agenda. Not since Herbert Hoover defeated their designated candidate, Al Smith, have they faced a bleaker future.

The Democrats had captured the presidency in 1912 when a divided Republican Party was defeated by a decidedly minority candidate Woodrow Wilson. Wilson recorded only slightly more votes than an almost equally split vote between the Party candidate, Taft, the insurgent candidate T. Roosevelt. In other words the combined Republican vote was a landslide endorsement of Republicans.

Wilson, as any Democrat, was sure that God’s own wisdom flowed through his brain. He thought himself virtue incarnate. Sure that he was the only one able to guide the nation he intended to run for a third term in 1920. His connection with God’s brain was severed when his own was paralyzed by a stroke.

The Democrats had no good backup candidate so the Republicans waltzed in with a candidate little more popular with the Dems than our own Donald Trump, Warren G. Harding. Harding, like Trump, refused to follow the Liberal agenda while restoring prosperity to the nation.

Harding died mysteriously, succeeded by his colorless VP Calvin Coolidge who was thought to be a sure loser. Contradicting the pundits Coolidge surprised, capturing the presidency on his own. His presidency was known was known as the phenomenal Coolidge Prosperity. A New Era with a car in every garage and two chickens in every pot.

Coolidge chose not to run for re-election and that brought Herbert Hoover, one of the greatest of Americans, to the fore. He easily routed the Dem Al Smith. Prosperity, a Republican prosperity, was at its peak. If that continued it was certain that Hoover would be re-elected and after him probably another Republican for another eight long years. The future looked dim for the Dems.

Only a great economic disaster could bring the Republicans down; the Federal Reserve easily handled that, engineering the Stock Market Crash of 1929. while others interfered with Hoover over the next three years preventing his ability to pull the country from the Great Depression. A then nearly, or actually, incompetent Democrat by the name of Franklin Delano Roosevelt took Hoover’s place thus keeping the country in Depression for seven long years and then he dragged the country into a totally destructive war that could easily have been avoided and next he blew the peace.

Thank you, Democrats.

In our time the Democrat Barack Obama led the country into a ruinous situation attempting to abort capitalism. The Dems under Obama had all but succeeded and would have succeeded if Hillary Clinton had not been out maneuvered by the unexpected and unwanted candidate, Donald Trump.

Now, as with Warren G. Harding, it appears that President Trump is leading the country into a prosperity to rival that of the Coolidge prosperity. The fear of the Dems is that if allowed to succeed Trump will be reelected while the future may be lost to the Dems for twenty years or more. They cannot let this happen. Thus, they may plunge the country into another horrendous depression to discredit the President as with Herbert Hoover or, failing that, an assassination as with Warren G. Harding.

They have furiously dug a hole for themselves in trying to set up some sort of impeachment process even though the President has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors. The whole charge seems to be that he was not their chosen candidate and had no right to win.

In an attempt to weaken the President they are now going after a key advisor Steve Bannon trying to discredit him in the President’s eyes and divide him from the President. This must not be allowed to happen. No machination against the President can be allowed to be taken seriously. An uncritical foul must be called as an instinctive reaction. Smear the Dems back.

Track down every Dem elected or candidate and expose their peccadilloes, sexual or economic, they all have them. Unprovable sex violations have proven to be most viable as witness the Republican Roy Moore of Alabama. Go after their wives, many affairs are hidden there.

Be aggressive not passive, this is a war to the end, attack and defend simultaneously. Be anonymous if possible. Deny everything.

Jeff Bezos- The Seattle Great Satan

Jeff Bezos- The Seattle Great Satan

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The tale has been told. The Alabama election is over. Judge Roy Moore has been turned back. Jones didn’t do it nor all the Negroes collected and bussed to the polls. No, ‘Bamans didn’t have anything to do with it. To find the man who singlehandedly beat the Judge you have to go to Seattle, Washington, the offices of Amazon, Inc. and sitting behind that big mahogany desk, Mr. Jeff Bezos. The Devil in disguise.

A couple years back Jeff Bezos bought the nearly defunct Washington Post Newspaper. Paid big money for it too. At them I asked myself why he did that. What was his plan to turn it around. He didn’t have a plan turn it around, he didn’t even change the format; if anything the paper was more Liberal than ever, staffed by the same nerds.

It did occur to me somewhen along the way that Jeff Bezos was grooming himself to run for President. Bezos is a world beater; a genius of some merit, he wants to be Master of the World; unscrupulous as the devil as he always gets around any rules that might slow him down.

The Judge Roy Moore candidacy shows us exactly why he bought the Post. Ever unscrupulous, he bought himself a slander machine, a defamation factory, a political slaughter house. The Post was unfeelingly, not critical, in its condemnation of candidate Trump. As the Post goes so must go its owner, Jeff Bezos.

Judge Roy is a real bete noir of the CFR, he is opposed to their agenda at every stop. They have tried to kill his career at each step. They have removed him from office because of his religion. No, he’s not Moslem, not a Scientologist, nobody has ever called him a Jew, no none of those: he’s the most despised of all, a bottom of the barrel damnable Christian. I don’t want you to get the idea that I’m religious, Defender of the Faith or anything like that. I’m not religious but that doesn’t mean I’m not anti-Christian. No. I’m also anti-Moslem and anti-Jewish while I don’t think much of Hinduism or any of those touchy-feely, warm and fuzzy outfits also.

So, going in Judge Roy had even more than three strikes against him; he was an entire side.

But, damn that son-of-a-bitch, here he was running for the Senate and a cinch to win. What the hell? Well, there sat Jeff Bezos, sometime richest man in the world, sitting behind the mahogany in his office in Seattle or, perhaps, roving his hundreds of thousands acre Texas ranch saying to himself, I’ve got to stop hat no good son-of-a-bitch and I know how to do it. I’ve got the right tool for the job.

I don’t know hat Amazon has a secret service but I’m sure they do, so he sent his sleuths down to ‘Bama to find some dirt or create. From the looks of that Senior yearbook it looks more like created. Anyway, as proof that she’d been molested forty years ago by Judge Roy she produced an inscription in her yearbook signed by Judge Roy. It looks like she presented it to him at some event, political or otherwise, held at some place called The Olde Hickory House, dated 1977.

Now, Judge Roy signed it something like ‘To a lovely girl.’ The woman (I don’t mention her name to protect her from possible harassment) commemorated his event by adding the place and date so she wouldn’t forget.

Jeff Bezos then published the story that Judge Roy was a pedophile and racist. The girl must have been all of eighteen and dizzy from standing next to the great Alabama blossoming legend, and that may the closest she ever got.

What defeated Judge Roy was that inscription in that yearbook that Jeff Bezos unscrupulously published with no fear of being brought to account for bearing false witness.

I got it! I know why Mr. Bezos bought the Washington Post. He’ll be our Democratic candidate in 2020 and he has one of the two most prestigious papers in the US to promote his interests and defend them.

The Pres. should call on his Republican buds to give Jeff Bezos the Bill Gates treatment. Keep him busy in Washington for a few months so he can’t run his Empire so effectively. Might be a lesson well learned.

Global Warming And Immigration

Global Warming And Immigration

by

R.E. Prindle

 

A fear of global warming and an affection for unlimited immigration are two positions in what ought to be called the demented Holocaustian religion of the West. The two positions are contradictory. At the same time that the Holocaustians, or Liberals to shorten the name, want to increase immigration to catastrophic levels the land area of the US is decreasing as the sea rises to cover it.

The rising waters will force an internal migration that will shift tens of millions of people from soon to be inundated locations while the remaining land surface will be unable to support the huge population. Tens of millions will die. This is especially troubling as the Eastern Seaboard which will be most severely affected by the rising waters is the most heavily populated. Cities such as New York, Boston, DC itself will be uninhabitable while vast stretches of arable land will disappear beneath the waters.

Major population centers such as the Houston/Corpus Christi and the whole Texas/Louisiana coast will disappear including New Orleans. Southern Louisiana is already disappearing. Florida especially is threatened. The whole peninsula is barely above water. Already areas are being flooded. Perhaps the whole peninsula will be inundated. Where will these tens of millions of internal migrants relocate as they compete for space with the tens upon tens of millions of external migrants being brought into the country by the Liberals?

While the Liberals quake in fear of global warming they continue to call for an ever-increasing population on an ever shrinking land surface. Are they actually thinking about the future or are they reactionaries living in a dreamy past in which ‘immigrants built this country?’ While immigration may have been beneficial in 1900, mainly to the immigrants themselves, it has no place in today’s overcrowded US. We abolished slavery, now let’s abolish immigration.

As the waters continue rising the resources of the US disappear. The ability for the country to subsist with the present day population can’t be maintained. The West of the US is a dry area from California to Washington and from Oregon to the borders of Missouri. The West cannot accommodate millions of immigrants. Already our quality of life is declining. Rivers have been dammed, water has been sucked out of the earth making devastating forest fires inevitable. The last twenty years have seen the devastation increasing yearly. Less land surface and more people isn’t going to help.

One can only hope that our President can put an end to senseless immigration. One applauds his decision to recognize the futility of ‘fighting’ global warming by pulling out of the Paris Accords. Now, let us hope that he has the equal courage to stop immigration in its tracks. None, not one, is the solution. To create incalculable misery down the road for hundreds of millions is not the ‘humanitarian’ result immigrationists should be shooting for. Sometimes humane intentions produce inhumane results. Use your clout, Mr. President, brush the objectors aside. They’re losers.

History Good And Bad

History Good And Bad:

Steve Bannon Attacked By Doug Irwin

by

R. E. Prindle

 

Hot stuff in the WSJ today (7/20/17). Douglas A. Irwin contributed a piece he titled Steve Bannon’s Bad History. Doug is apparently a big deal from Dartmouth with several learned tomes dealing with free trade to his credit.

Through no fault of his own his fame had escaped me till now. We have a clever double entendre in his title.   It can be interpreted as Steve has a malodorous past or, as the article makes clear, a weak grasp of history. From the title I thought the former but fortunately I sought further enlightenment in the body of the piece and learned differently. Is that called research?

Doug is critical of Steve’s ‘faulty’ thinking concerning the tariff issue. His highlight blurb blazons, ‘Immigration and rapid industrialization – not tariffs – made the nineteenth century economy great.’ I take exception to the blurb.

While it may be arguable, the modern economic nineteenth century didn’t begin until after the Civil War. And the economy wasn’t that great in the remaining thirty-five years of the century that included the near collapse of society in the crash of 1873, and that was worldwide, and the equally horrendous crash of 1893. Between the two of them they consumed at least ten of the thirty-five years.

However, even with 1873 and 1893 the industrial base expanded enormously. Time were tough but not for everybody.

Immigration and rapid industrialization can also be written as cheap unskilled labor and amazing scientific and technological discoveries. The century or latter part of it was built on steel rails and high powered locomotives and starvation slave wages paid for unskilled labor.

 

I’ve been working on the railroad,

Sleeping on the ground,

Eating saltine crackers

Ten cents a pound.

 

Causes for great pride and no pride at all. History is uneven.

The tariff that restricted European competition, the rest of the world was of no account at the time, facilitated rapid growth as it provided the sufficient profits to develop industries. Believe it or not the US prided itself on its high wage structure, immigrants and underpaid unskilled labor aside. Somebody had to buy all that wonderful stuff. Short life light bulbs weren’t all that cheap.

Doug may think tariffs didn’t help but, perhaps he should tell that to the current Chinese. They don’t bother with tariffs they just forbid foreign competition as they build up their industries often with pirated technology. As Doug ought to know the Chinese are famous for hacking computers and stealing trade secrets.

I know it is politically incorrect to point out these obvious facts but, what the hell, the truth is the truth. But, no defense.

Steve’s history may not be all that good but it may equal Doug’s.

President Trump On The Discard Pile

President Trump On The Discard Pile

by

R.E. Prindle

 

When you’re stuck in Juarez,

And it’s Eastertime too,

And your negativity fails you,

And gravity don’t pull you through…

Bob Dylan

 

It is clear at this point that Pres. Trump is going to be discarded. The process by which it will be done may be becoming clear. First he must be discredited in the eyes of his constituency so that sympathy for him is destroyed. DACA, the Wall, Immigration, the renunciation of the will of the people who elected him will be essentially the final straw while at the same time being the Left’s renunciation of democracy. The CFR triumphant.

What is the How?

Let us review the 1916 election between Wilson and Hughes. It was a very close election, not unlike the 2016 election, and Wilson actually thought he had lost. It was three days later when the results were determined that he knew he found himself still president. In those days the inauguration was in March. The World War was in progress and Wilson deemed it important that effective leadership be continuous in case he did lose. He therefore devised a plan so that Hughes could seamlessly succeed him according to the Constitution.

Thus, following the succession in case of the President’s death or incapacity was and is to the VP, then to the Secretary of State. In Wilson’s case the VP would resign, the serving Secretary of State would resign and the President would appoint Hughes to succeed him then resign himself. Hughes thus being elevated immediately to the office.

In 1916 the plan wasn’t needed. Let us transpose the plan to the present. Trump is to be given a life or death choice, it probably has already happened, to resign or die.

Trump’s situation can be compared to that of President Harding who won the 1920 election placing him in opposition to the League of Nation forces. Not to be denied, Harding died of mysterious symptoms two years into his presidency. It was assumed that the colorless VP, Calvin Coolidge, could be swept aside in 1924. Such proved not to be the case so the League forces had to wait for the 1928 election where they were disappointed again by the election of Herbert Hoover. Hoover was discredited by the staged stock market crash of 1929 and then manhandled for the duration of his presidency, much as Trump has been manhandled, opening the way for FDR.

Now, after Trump has disillusioned his constituency sufficiently Pence will resign as VP. By my understanding Pence has always been a stooge of the CFR and will perform his role without a problem. The succession then passes to Secretary of State Tillerson. Trump has already renounced his control of the military to Mattis and has delegated his powers as President to Tillerson at State. Tillerson has been given what is in effect a Power of Attorney to act in the President’s name. Tillerson then in the affairs of State is already the de facto President. That means he has the full approval of the CFR. The transmission has been seamless.

Well, that’s in the eyes of the CFR not mine, and not in the eyes of the majority of Americans who will then, finally, realize that they have been taken for a ride. Their will has been betrayed by a cabal.

The CFR would do well to pay attention to what’s happening to the attendance of professional football over the Kaepernick fiasco. Those empty seats will not likely be soon filled. The NFL has committed suicide by not responding appropriately to majority opinion.

As with the NFL the connection between the people and the US Government in Washington DC will be broken; all cooperation will cease. The country will be adrift. The government’s only choice will be to try to rule by force or terror.

Beware the consequences of thwarting or removing President Trump; the end game is at hand.

The Civil War Never Ended

The Civil War Never Ended

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Considerable evidence exists to show that the Civil War began in England in 1066 when Big Bill Norman stepped ashore at Hastings with his hordes and pasted the natives. The Normans, named after Big Bill known in those days as William the Conqueror but now edited to meet current standards proceeded to enslave the Anglo-Saxons who had been lounging around the area holding the territory for the Normans. The Anglo-Saxons considered their enslavement a betrayal. A fierce debate concerning this so-called betrayal is still raging. The reader is invited to make up his own mind. Get a few more facts first.

Over there in East Anglia, on the East side of England, this slavery bit, iron collars and all did not go down well. A great deal of resentment was stored away. This was before the days of psychoanalysis so it went into their unconscious but not all that deep. This resentment blazed up in 1600 something when the East Anglians rose up and slew the good King Charlie the One. Old resentments die hard and a lot harder than you think. A lesson to be borne in mind.

The fight would have been contained on English shores but for the fact that the New World had been discovered shortly before Charlie’s head hit the basket, or he dangled, I forget which but when you’re dead how important is it? Escaping Charlie’s and his dad Jim’s oppression, real or imagined, a couple decades before a largish body of East Anglians now going by the name of Puritans fled across the big water, much bigger then when boats were slower, while sometimes not arriving at all, to land on the sparsely populated shore that they named New Anglia and that became New England.

Well, wouldn’t you just know it? No sooner were they getting settled than this fellow Cromwell from Old Anglia killed Charlie and seized England. Now the Anglo-Saxon ruled the roost and those damn Normans, now going by the name of Cavaliers, had to hightail it across the water too.

They now, in their turn, crossed over to the New World but veered South and formed the colony of Virginia, named after an English queen of doubtful virtue, don’t let the name fool you. It’s true that Charlie was a Scot and not a Norman but as nothing was named after him in the New World, it didn’t matter.

So, now, here is one of the great overlooked facts of history. The Puritans of New England were glaring almost eyeball to eyeball at the Cavaliers. I have no doubts they would have gone to war right away if the older colony of New Amsterdam, now New York, Old York is North of East Anglia in the Old Country, had it not been blocking the way.

But there was blood in the eye of the unforgiving Anglians. They stewed, their resentment festered. Then the Norman’s enslaved some savage Negroes from Africa. There, the Anglians thought, they went and did it again. It was a habit not a one off. But this time the Anglians were going to get those bastards and get them good. Kill them all.

Well, to make a long story medium long the Anglos began working up a head of steam about slavery even though they were not pure themselves. It wasn’t so much that they cared about the Africans, hell, they were just a bunch of savages anyway, but that slavery bit…if you know what I mean. We was slaves too and we’re not going to tolerate slavery now. If the Jews had been there in numbers it would have been quite a gathering of ex-slaves and slaves. A monster convention.

So the Anglians whipped up the bloodiest war there ever was and by force of excessive numbers, conscripting a whole lot of people who didn’t have a dog In the fight, they drove Old Dixie down. Yes, sir. They drove Old Dixie down. If you think that was enough for the Anglians, it wasn’t. They wanted to kill off the whole damn lot of those Normans, cum Cavaliers and any other White men who got conscripted, no distinctions. Justice is justice, yes, sir. Stern justice. Remember that. The field of Hasting’s will not be forgot although I don’t think it was mentioned at that time. I just made an historical interpolation, that’s all.

Well, those damn Yankees would’ve murdered the Southern Chivalry for sure except for, if you remember, New York was in the way, as well as Pennsylvania that had been added later. Cooler heads prevailed so the Yankees were reduced to imposing Reconstruction. They stripped that Chivalry of all weapons and denuded them of all rights and then made them subjects of their former Negro, African, dark slaves. Racist minds considered this an indignity, but the Negroes enjoyed it.

Yankee power would fade after a while and while Dixie didn’t rise again the White Folks would break their hold and bring their own heads level with their shoulders again. After another little while they had a silent revolution that was called Jim Crow and regained control of their country. Oddly enough they aligned themselves with their New England enemies and became the Democratic Party. Republicans had left a bad odor in the land.

Now, where was I? Oh yea, Jim Crow, believe it or not but the Rebs imposed Jim Crow on the whole of the United States. Then Jim Crow came to a crashing end in 1954, no whimper there, when the Negroes and their Northern allies staged a bloodless coup, a legal decision called Brown v. the Board of Education, something like that. Yes, sir, Jim Crow was over and the Liberal occupation of America began. Another revolution of sorts. Not unlike the first Reconstruction, the disenfranchisement of Whites began. You was with ‘em or you was Nazis. Yes, sir. The Yankees and allies became the Party of Virtue while any who objected to the occupation was of the Party of Evil, styled Nazis after the Party that fought Communism in the Old World.

The Party of Virtue had it their way, no matter what Party occupied the White House until 2016 when the game went wrong somehow. It wasn’t supposed to be that way but it was. The Virtue Party has kicked against the pricks, refused to accept the voice of Democracy that said they had overstepped the bounds. The Virtue party however became unvirtuous and would not accept the will of the country. Democracy or no democracy they should have won, they thought and said, hell, they even rebelled in the streets, they made Sumter look like child’s play. It is too early to tell, but maybe the Second Reconstruction is over and on the National level the Johnny Rebs are back in control.

As you can see, there is nothing new here, the war goes on, only the weapons change. What began in 1066 in England is still being fought out today. Will it end here? Nobody knows. The wheel of fortune is still spinning, the vagaries of history is still happening. My only hope is that it will be the best thing for the country. This I do know, it won’t be right if it comes from those Damn Yankees.

Battle Cry

Battle Cry

By

R.E. Prindle

https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=10212369520566491&id=1034444755

When did our national discourse become so consumed with the state of our national discourse? Rarely has so much public dialogue been dedicated to arguing over what can’t be said, who can’t say it and just how they shouldn’t put it. It has always been politically profitable to frame your opponents’ rhetoric as irrational, cruel, even dangerous. But our now-constant public skirmishes over speech have moved to another level entirely: These days, the closer you can situate your opponents’ words to actual violence, the better.

When James Hodgkinson opened fire at a Republican congressional baseball practice in June—wounding Representative Steve Scalise of Louisiana among others—he was killed in the attack and left no manifesto to explain his actions. But the shooting immediately became, for many, a chilling example of the consequences of someone else’s rhetoric, and commentators raced to track down who that “someone” might be.

A Newsweek headline asked if “anti-Trump” rhetoric inspired the shooter…

Amanda Hess NYT

Magazine 8/20/17

This post concerns a discussion on Michael Sellers’ Facebook page.  It should be of interest.

Cc: Johannes Rebhan, Alan Derian, Ian Hawke, Scott Rosen

Gentlemen: In reply to your comments I had written a reasoned comment that attempted to deal with facts and historical opinion. However, since reading your comments among others on Michael Sellers’ post of the last couple days of scurrilous ad hominems and defamation I didn’t think you deserved it while it would be futile as you refuse to answer arguments preferring to resort to slander. Therefore I am going to tell you how you appear to an intelligent reader of your comments.

Scott Rosen is a mere thug with a mouthful of canards and insults. In addition he is not so bright as he spells the Adolf of Hitler Adolph with a ph. Scott is no longer welcome on my site.

Next, let’s consider Alan Derian. His reply was very interesting because he cleverly manages to threaten me with dire consequences if I don’t fall in line without exposing himself to the casual reader as he says it is my choice whether I want to be beaten or whatever thereby exculpating himself.

His comment is very well composed, he obviously knows what he is doing.

Quote:

OK, RE. Before anyone else reacts to your last discussion about the science of the abilities of the races, let me address two points.

Unquote.

Here Alan admits that there is a science that addresses the relative abilities of the races. This is an important point because he admits that there are races and that they have differing abilities.

As an aside the Liberals on Seller’s thread always speak of scientific disciplines as if that knowledge is wholly different and separate from other knowledge. They speak of scientists as though they were a different race, almost alien, rather than merely someone whose specialty is physics or chemistry etc.. In point of fact anyone with the necessary intelligence can take up a scientific specialty although those who excel at them possess superior qualities and are few.

Scientific disciplines are one thing while the use of the scientific method is available to anyone and applicable to any task. When I was in college we were told to not take the course information too seriously but if we got the method that was the point. I got the method. You Ian, although a fine fellow do not have the method although you have an overweening self-confidence in your opinions.

Alan then continues:

Quote: First, you are correct in saying that in Communist countries opposing speech was censored and how America is supposed to be different [exceptional] and allow free speech. But that term “free speech” is a misnomer. America has freer speech, it has a wide range (of) what kind of speech it allows, BUT, all countries, in order to survive, must enforce their core values and reject and suppress those who work to undermine those values.

Unquote:

As we all know, America is a diverse society of many cultures each vying for dominance. Aryan culture did not inhibit the speech of any culture or political point of view. In other words whatever core values the Aryan society of the nineteenth century possessed and expected all immigrants to accept has now been split into competing cultures with different core values who wish to inhibit speech. So, Mr. Derian leaves open as to which core values he is referring to. As he here offers a tactic of the Jewish culture, which has no provision for free speech or conscience, it is obvious to which diversity Mr. Derian belongs and whose core values he wants to protect.

As Judaism is a semi-autonomous culture, as now are the Negro and Moslem cultures, while he seemingly speaks for Americans in general or universally his concern is for Jewish core values. In the struggle for cultural supremacy the Jews at present are leading the rest. Mr. Derian is also an Israeli citizen; a dual citizen who carries an Israeli passport or can obtain one but it is an important consideration. One needn’t ask where his primary loyalty lies.

Now, these White demonstrators characterized as Nazis by Mr. Derian are specifically guarding the core values of the Aryan population of the US. As Mr. Derian points out they must do this or be submerged. The problem is that they are competing with Jews, Negroes, Moslems on the same basis. Quite obviously they are the enemies of Mr. Derian and his Jews and vice versa. Virtue is not the issue here as all are fighting for the same cause but who they are. There is no possible way of faulting the Aryans without faulting Negroes, Jews and Moslems.
The Aryans were also shouting, according to reports: The Jews will not replace us. Given the competition for supremacy between the Jews and others this is a legitimate war cry. They are also reported as shouting Blood and Soil. As their core values, which Mr. Derian admits must be defended by any means necessary are based on blood as are Mr. Derian’s Jews as well as the Negroes, not so much the Moslems, and soil which means that as they are Americans they have no other soil to claim. This is not the case with Mr. Derian and his fellow Jews. Anywhere they hang their yarmulke is home to them.

Now, Mr. Derian says that ‘free speech’ is a misnomer and that in defense of a culture’s core values anyone who challenges them can be forcibly shut up by any means necessary. This is strange, as Mr. Derian then invokes the Constitution of the United States which guarantees unrestricted freedom of speech as well as assembly and has been confirmed by the recent decision of the Supreme Court as a core value of the United States. Mr. Derian is subjecting himself to a forcible rebuke.

He then quotes the words “all men are created equal” from the Constitution out of context and says that this is a core value that must never be attenuated as if a mere phase could be attenuated. He neglects to complete the sentence to: “in regard to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.” There is no reference to preference of certain people. The rest of the sentence changes the meaning imputed by Mr. Derian as the evidence for all men being created equal makes it an oxymoron. Quite obviously all men are not created equal as a certain percentage of births are stigmatized with often horrible birth defects.

Further, in the broader sense, Mr. Derian has already admitted that there is a science of racial differences which implies that all men are not only not created equal but those differences persist throughout life.   Thus, Mr. Derian is hoist by his own petard.

For Mr. Derian it is enough to impose his opinion on US law even though no laws support his points.

Thus while other countries have draconian laws to protect ‘their ‘ core’ values, one of which in most European countries is to never, never criticize the Jews or their interpretations of the holocaust and WWII or you will be put in concentration camps called prisons and have at least a portion of your assets confiscated. It should be clear whose core values take precedence both in the US and Europe and that those values are not endemic to any European country.

The difference in the US, he says, is people might lose their jobs, that is, their means of subsistence, get screamed at by counter-protestors, that is, competing cultures, deprived of their core value of free, not freer, speech and otherwise to be made to feel bad. That is defamation, insults, directed hatred, which, one imagines are acts of tough love to bring the deluded in line.

To cap his climax Mr. Derian makes this dire threat, which one is led to believe is backed by the full force of the Jews and their auxiliaries.

Quote:

Bottom line: all men are created equal. Not all men are more or less created the same depending on your race, gender, sexual orientation, or religion. Men. Equal. Period. You either adopt that or you get crapped on. Your choice.

Unquote.

So, Mr. Derian ends his diatribe with the threat that you either go along with his and the Jews’ program or they will fuck you over like you have never been fucked over before. Your choice: On your knees before your masters, slaves, or what happens to you you have brought on yourself. Your masters are free of guilt; you have been warned.

So, American democracy has come to that. The Jews are staged to replace Whites and the Aryan demonstrators were quite right to chant Jews Will Not Replace Us. That, does however, remain to be seen. The war is on, not over.

Quote

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The website 23&Me ran a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal today. (6/20/17) titled Everyone Deserves A Place In The World.

The ad posits this possible fact:Over 65 million. That is the amount of people who have been forced from their homes worldwide. Continuing conflicts and political instability…continue to displace more and more people each day.

I’m sure the above is trueish. The implication is that someone, obviously in more stable areas, should take them in because,

…we still have a tendency to focus on differences when we talk about humanity

I’m not sure that the conclusion drawn from the premise follows. This is known as fuzzy thinking.

We see otherness when we should see kinship.

We see “them” not “us”.

But on a genetic level, human beings are 99.5% identical.

This is pure scientific fact.

I don’t know how pure that science is or even if it’s a fact, but I do know this: I can’t run as fast as Usain Bolt. Something tells me that there’s more than .5% difference between us.

The ad goes on to implicitly call for the more politically stable US and Europe to take in all 65 million. There is a basis to compare the facts of taking in just a few million to taking in 65 million. I’m not just talking the logistics.

Europe, Canada and the US have taken in several million Moslem displaced human beings who according to 23&Me are nearly exactly like us, but do they think the same. Only .5% difference but we are all 100% human beings.

Just a few million displaced persons have created constant turmoil in the once stable European countries of Sweden, Germany, England France and Italy. Our fellow human beings have colonized cities and large areas from which they exclude “us”. These areas are called no go zones for “us”.

Our fellow human beings (99.5% identical) have murdered innumerable “usses” in terrorist attacks, they have raped countless women and blamed the rape on them because they were inappropriately dressed. In other words they wore European clothes rather than Moslem clothes. That’s all it took to justify rape in Moslem minds. (99.5%) They have bullied thousands of men who are forbidden defend themselves lest they be jailed as Islamophobes.

Yes, 23&Me they share 99.5% DNA but are they 100% grateful human beings? Did I mention that among their crimes they coerced thousands of underage English girls into prostitution? Does that affect you at all?

Are there 65 million displaced persons in the world? Are you aware, 23%Me, that in a couple decades, by 2050, when the world population increases by a billion or so that there may be over 200 million or more displaced persons?

I don’t think your heart will be big enough to contain them.

Thanks for the lovely sentiments.

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World