George Soros Put His Money Where His Mouth Is

George Soros

Puts His Money

Where His Mouth Is

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Check out the 9/20/16 Wall Street Journal for a great self-aggrandizing blurb by George Soros that George grandiloquently titles: Why I’m Investing $500 million dollars In migrants. George apparently thinks this is such a charitable act that he doesn’t need any candles lit for his grand entrance into heaven.

The WSJ highlights Georges bit with this quote: I will invest in startups, established companies, social-impact initiatives, and businesses founded by migrants and refugees.

Not that he is donating, this is not a charitable gesture, he’s going to invest expecting one might think to at least double his money. Heck, imagine if he found another Microsoft. That would turn his money green.

So, put simply, without grandiosity, it’s nice to know that George has 500 million to invest. Of course, who wouldn’t have half a billion to invest after looting the British treasury of billions.

Remember, one of George’s ‘social impact initiatives’ was the burning of Ferguson, the defamation of the police, and not a few deaths. Now, that’s social impact.

There are other bigger social impact initiatives George is interested in such as what he calls ‘forced migration.’ As we all know George is Jewish and that Israel, the home of the Jews, is largely responsible for the war in Iraq that created this ‘forced migration’ and that migration is now directed and encouraged by Israeli agents to move ‘migrants’ out of the area especially to Europe. Mama Merkel is believed to have taken a large bribe to allow a million edging toward two into Germany almost overnight. Perhaps that is a social-impact initiative George is funding.

Gosh, you know, George is part of the supposed most intelligent race on earth with an awesome average IQ North of 110. That’s brainy and I’ll bet George has a 160-200 IQ to help bring that average up. That’s super smart. Although it is only those Jews who have been in contact with Europeans for thousands of years who supposedly have that 110>, Jews in contact with areas out of Europe only sport an 85 but they’re catching up fast, I’ll bet.

So, while George is spending all this money to raft sub-Saharan Africans across the Mediterranean one wonders why he doesn’t think to plunk that 500 million down in Lagos and organize a bunch of startups on those ‘forced migrants’ home turf where the people have their roots, memories and traditions.

As George says, (I) will seek investments in a variety of sectors, among them emerging digital technologies which seem especially promising as a way to provide solutions to the particular problems that dislocated people often face.

Nigeria? Perfect for your more or less charitable efforts George. Nigeria has it all. Oil and tech and computer skills. Gosh, they’ve made tens of millions soliciting people in the West by computer to help them get hundreds of millions of petro dollars out of Nigeria for investment in the West.

A little kick start like 500 million and we’ll have the Silicon River, opening jobs to tens of millions of Africans allowing them to stay home. No more forced migration. Why, a lot of African migrants to Europe and the US might even drift back to Africa in ‘unforced migration.’

Think about it George, you might not be looking at the problem from the right perspective. Why force these people looking for a better life to move George when you can create a better life for them right there at home. Tech and oil: Think George. Use that massive IQ.

Moslems: Should We Use Our Head Or Should We Use Our Heart?

Moslems:

Should We Use Our Head

Or, Should We Use Our Heart?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Ye Editor at the Wall Street Journal (9/17-18/16) babbles on. I have never considered the Journal a Conservative paper and now Ye Editor drops the façade and goes full buttoned up Liberal.

Ye Editor: Thanks to the Obama Administration and Congressional Republicans, the GOP candidate now has a chance to show common sense on the matter of Muslims.

I suppose that’s code for saying a back door has been found to let in Moslems. Sure enough. Trump according to Ye Editor has ‘a chance to prove his policy is not anti-Muslim but anti-jihad.’ Ah, then we wrong to think all jihadists are Muslims. I suppose then that as all jihadists are Moslems they wear identifying badges, because if they don’t…. Or one imagines that a Moslem who for a number of years hasn’t been a jihadist may one day wake up and say it is time he came out of the closet. Perhaps Ye Editor thinks that jihadists are born that way. Just another Moslem sect.

Oh, and sects. There are a number of Moslem sects. The Wahabis are supposed to be the most militant of all. The Saudi WTC boys may well have been Wahabis as they were Saudis. Would Ye Editor agree that Wahabis have the most potential to come out of the closet, supposing they are in the closet, and that therefore Wahabis should definitely be banned by Trump or, perhaps, even by Obama, that great and wise leader.

Does Ye Editor even know whether Obama has considered that problem?

And regional. Do most jihadists come from certain regions? Sunnis, Shiites? Perhaps the US should be selective as to sect and region? But, then, what if a Moslem lies about his sect or region? Bigoted to think a Moslem might lie? Well, the Koran, the Moslem guide book and holy script says it’s perfectly A-OK to lie to the Nasranis. US personnel are most likely to be Nasranis so putting the question would be useless.

I’m sure common sense comes in here somewhere. Maybe, just maybe, Trump is exhibiting common sense when he says he will ban all Moslems.   I think he is. Common sense is good but it is not the ultimate test. Don’t education and intelligence work in there too? I sure hope so. Perhaps thought I’m all head and no heart while Ye Editor is the latter and not the former. Well, Ye Editor, it is common sense to not screw yourself. Letting in Moslems is screwing yourself but then, I guess you’re comfortable with that.

 

Trump: Do not let these geeks back you off from your original stand concerning Moslems. When you’re right you’re right.

God Bless America

 

 

God Bless America

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Now is the time for all good people to come to the aid of their party.

 

As Woody Guthrie wrote in his immortal song: This land is your land, this land is my land… , and by extension, this land is our land. This land is our home.

This election year will prove whose land it really is, our land or the land of roving transients from the four corners of the earth. Renegade, so-called Americans of the Liberal Party, wish to transform our land into a land of indeterminate form, people and culture.

Our culture, our hopes, our dreams are to be discarded, subsumed into what they call multi-culturalism. One doesn’t have to be a genius to see that multi-culturalism is a transient condition; it will slowly evolve into a uniform culture. The Liberals wish to discard our long and worthy culture in favor of whatever may be.

This election will prove whether we can maintain a strong position, imposing our culture of being stripped of it. It is an either or situation. The schools must be reclaimed for our culture. Of course there will be melding, that is an inevitable consequence of mixing cultures but our mores, our culture, our traditions must remain supreme.

Of course the Liberals have an arsenal of names to denigrate us: racists, anti-Semites, homophobes, Islamaphobes, Basket Of Retards, but a laugh and a wave of the hand dismisses those defamations.

We must seize the moment. As Irving Berlin wrote in his immortal hymn of 1940 when our culture then seemed doomed: God bless America, land that I love, stand beside her and guide her…. Yes, stand up and stand beside your land, your hopes and dreams, and guide her to a safe harbor.

Now is the hour to take our stand. The hour will pass and won’t come again. Carpe Diem: Seize the moment. Get a basket of your friends together make sure you vote in November. Make sure you vote Trump. The Trump Party is the only and last chance. Don’t fail your children and grand-children, vote, and vote Trump. The future depends on you.

Obama Defends Kaepernick

 

 

Obama Defends Kaepernick’s Protest

by

R.E. Prindle

 

http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nfl/2016/09/05/obama-defends-kaepernicks-national-anthem-protest/89879478/

 

President Obama said Monday that NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernick was “exercising his constitutional right: to bring attention to racial injustice by not taking part in the national anthem…

 

…Obama said he did not doubt Kaepernick’s sincerity to highlighting social issues and noted the player was the latest in a long line of professional sports figures to do so. The president also acknowledged that Kaepernick’s silent protest was a “tough thing” for many members of the military to accept.

 

“When it comes to the flag and the national anthem and the meaning that holds for our men and women in uniform and those who fought for us—that is a tough thing for them to get past.” Obama said. “but I don’t doubt his sincerity. I think he cares about some real, legitimate issues that have to be talked about. If nothing else, he’s generated more conversation about issues that have to be talked about.”

 

Our great Constitutional scholar has spoken. He says that there is a Constitutional right to bring attention to a racial matter. I don’t know what Barry was smoking or snorting but it’s not clear to me where he read there is a right to bring attention to any problem. In fact I don’t see a Constitutional question involved at all. Barry has invoked a right too far.

What we do have is the broader question of respect for others (frequently invoked as ‘offensive’) and following established mores. People don’t talk much about mores anymore but what is occurring now is an assault on mores to exchange established mores for more race based mores. Kaepernick launched an all out attack for Negro Supremacy by discarding mores followed by American citizens for a replacement of those mores by new Negro mores. Mores govern how a society functions.

For those with an ear to the ground, finger on the pulse and an eye for flashing changes being imposed on Americans by this traitorous president what is being attempted is clear. The Negro is rejecting White mores and the unpleasant past of slavery. Negro Revolutionaries form an entirely different set that displaces American mores. Thus disrespecting the flag that represents slavery and Jim Crow to them. Photos of revolutionaries of any color standing on the Flag or burning it is not so much disrespect for the Flag as a rejection of what Negroes think it stands for. There is no more outstanding image of the move to replace what some call ‘the historic American nation’. That nation, weird old America, and what they call White Supremacy is anathema to them.

If you’re really listening to the rhetoric, following the photo images this should require no explanation. What more do you need to see this clearly than the hate law that the coloreds and their ally passed making White heterosexual males second class citizens? I am amazed that there is no outcry against this. My voice is a solo coming from the wilderness.

Boy Obama himself shares this disrespect and hatred of White Americans. Just listen to the precedence he gives to the grumbling of this privileged multi-millionaire athlete over ‘those who fought for us.’

When it comes to the flag and the national anthem and the meaning it holds for our men and women in uniform and those who fought for it—that is a tough thing for them to get past, but I don’t doubt (Kaepernick’s) sinceri

Do you see the arrogance, hear the sneer of this nit picked off the streets of New York City, given a law degree from Harvard and pushed into the White House without a single qualification? He says to the returned vets of Viet Nam, that dirty little war, not all returned, tens of thousand of their spirits haunt Nam, says to them and their surviving brothers: Fuck y’all. Get over it. Why? Because he doesn’t doubt Kaepernick’s sincerity. He doesn’t doubt his sincerity!

And this arrogant buffoon, Barry Obama, places a football player’s sincerity over the sacrifice of a million or more men who put their bodies and sanity into the jungles and swamps of an ungrateful Viet Nam.

If you voted for him, shame on you. If you voted for him twice (two different elections) you should bury your head in the sand and leave it there. If you intend to vote for his surrogate, Hitler Clinton this time around you will have to do penance.

If anything Obama has shown how easy it is to change the mores of a whole nation, however such rapid change makes them more fluid and even easier to direct the flow. For us it is to reject Obama’s mores and direct the flow into a better and more reasonable channel. Our Lives Matter. To do so requires the rejection of Liberal and Negro influence and their marginalization. As unpleasant as that task may be to our mores it must be taken up. Contempt for Obama is rising; it must be amplified.

As Obama himself says: ‘I’d rather have…people who are engaged in the argument and trying to think through how they can be part of our democratic process than people who are just sitting on the sidelines not paying attention at all.’   President Obama, you have found us.

Heil Obama! We are paying attention. Take up our arms, we’re marching again. Our democracy will be established with liberty and justice for all not just the Liberal few. Re-enfranchise the White heterosexual male – down with hate laws.

Vote Trump

Listen To Donald Trump; Your Lives Depend On It

 

 

Listen To Donald Trump: Your Life Depends On It

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Since Trump began being briefed for the presidency, no matter how badly, the tenor of his speeches has changed dramatically. Perhaps the FBI has disclosed their private information on the machinations of Obama that they were unable to disclose under Obama’s thumb.

When Trump now announced that Obama has strategically placed one hundred thousand Mexican paramilitaries (Trump doesn’t use this term) he, Trump, says that he will as his first move arrest the whole lot. My impression is that this accusation is very, very serious. As Trump says, you, we, are not bigots, we are good people and as such have every right to protect our lives, our loved ones lives and our children’s lives.

You may be sure that many Moslem communities as well have been strategically placed so that on the signal all will rise as one. Knowing the danger of predicting the event it is in all likelihood very close, perhaps on the eve of the election or alternatively the eve of Trump’s inauguration. Remember that Obama has categorically said that Trump will not be president; take him at his word.

It behooves you to listen to what Trump is saying; he is telling you something, as much as he dares.

Despite what you may have been led to believe Trump is an honest candidate. He cares for the United States and its survival. Put your prejudice behind you, discard all the slander of the MSM, Hillary and the administration. You have been taken. Put your support behind Trump now. He is putting his life on the line for you and for our country. Make no mistake the next four three months will be the most critical the country has ever experienced.

Evil times await you if you don’t support Trump. The abyss yawns.

The Birth Of Two Nations

 

 

The Birth Of Two Nations

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In 1915 D.W. Griffith and Thomas Dixon Jr. released what is perhaps the most famous movie, silent or talkie, ever made. The movie that depicts the aftermath of the Civil War, that is Reconstruction, was the biggest spectacle ever produced to that time, and also the highest grosser.

The movie was addressed to the North. For the North the Civil War was a war of extermination intended to kill all the White Southerners. That they didn’t succeed is a mere accident of history. For instance, read War Crimes Against Southern Civilians by Walter Brian Cisco. After a hundred and fifty years later Southerners finally feel free to tell the truth. The book will help you understand Griffith’s Birth of a Nation.

Thus the nation Griffith and Dixon referred to was the unity of the Aryan Nation. The Birth was its hoped for reunification after the horrors of the Civil War. The plea was never to kill each other again; especially avoiding the genocidal horrors of Generals William Tecumseh Sherman and Phil Sheridan among many other Northern commanders.

Naturally the movie was seen as racial and racist and a great hue and cry was raised by Negroes and Jews but not by the men who fought the war either North or South. While the movie in many cases was viewed by participants and survivors of that great conflict, and thought to accurately represent the situation a barrage of defamation was directed at D.W. Griffith, the director, and Thomas Dixon, the writer.

Dixon who was a best selling author of talent and a good story teller was gradually turned into a racist monster having no place in American literature or culture. Both he and Griffith’s careers began a precipitous decline following the movie and both died penniless and in obscurity.

Now, a hundred years later in an effort to co-opt history a new film also titled Birth of a Nation has been written, directed and acted by Nate Parker. Nate is a Negro. His film deals with a slave uprising led by Nat Turner in Southhampton County, Virginia in 1831. The rebellion was a murderous, bloody, rapefest that ended as it must have once the surprise was over and the Whites organized. But, what is meant by Nate Parker’s filming the movie? Is it merely to mock Griffith and Dixon or is he calling for a unification of the present Negroes to exterminate present Whites?   In other words, a serious call for the birth of a Negro United States or Nation? The film certainly excites the Negro people to do battle with the White Demons. And that at a time when the Negroes are already working themselves into a lather finding excuses to kill, burn and loot.

The very people who denounce Griffith and Dixon now applaud Parker as the auteur of a fantastic picture. They little know that they are the projected victims of the film.

However Nate Parker has complicated the matter by having been tried for raping a White girl in college, sort of following Griffith and Dixon’s script that was denounced as defamatory.   The White girl is described as being unconscious, thus one imagines drugged, hence unable to give consent as Parker claims while having gratified his hatred of Whites on the girl’s body. Having gratified his hatred Parker invited his Black roommate into the room to have some too. So we have a gang rape.

So the Griffith film in which a Negro gratifies his lust on a White girl seems to have been reenacted by Parker even though the scene in Griffith’s film was called inaccurate and racist.

Parker, of course, represenst his rape of the girl as a mere youthful indiscretion and he’s put all that behind him; convenient for him although his victim subsequently committed suicide at the age of thirty. Collateral damage.   So let’s forget about the mistake and concentrate on Parker’s movie that calls for lots more murder and rape.

Let’s try to place Parker and his movie into a historical continuum. The Nat Turner uprising occurred in South Hampton County, Virginia in 1831 as noted. The uprising was not too far distant in time from the 1804 revolt of Toussaint L’Ouverture in Haiti which established the independence of Haiti from the French. Haiti was a major event in the consciousness of nineteenth century history. While Toussaint did not in any sense defeat Napoleon as some historians claim he did defeat troops of the Empire. The reaction among Whites was stupendous. Some feared an uprising in the US like that of Nat Turner other lauded Toussaint as the greatest military figure of all time surpassing Washington, Napoleon, Caesar and whoever. Just the greatest and that because he was a Negro. Matthew Clavin in his fine book Toussaint L’Ouverture and the American Civil War details the reaction to Toussaint’s victory. All the White men were massacred while the White women were given the choice of a horrible death or marriage to Negroes, but a real marriage not a mockery of one. Most women chose to submit to the Negroes.

The Whites not murdered during the Haitian Revolution fled to the nascent United States. While France had sold Louisiana to the US in 1803 New Orleans was still considered a French colony to which many of the slave owners repaired bringing their slaves with them. Many of the slave owners were mulattoes and Negroes thus New Orleans had a large corps of Negro slave owners at the time of the Civil War.

Others landed along the Gulf Coast so news of Haiti was general in the South among both slave owners and slaves. This Haitian rebellion then both incited Nat Turner and terrified the Whites. So, the result was murder, theft and rapine what it would seem Nate Parker is inciting with his movie. As far as rape goes he knows what he’s talking about.

Efforts are being made to prevent the theater release in October, not only by Whites but by Negroes also. This would seem wise. In the event of a Negro uprising that could occur before election time or at least inauguration that might seem to justify martial law and the continuation of Obama rule. Some worry about this and their worries may be justified. We’ll see. I fear that the US is now two nations and not one.

Vote Trump anyway.

Does Trump Miss The Point On Tech Visas?

 

 

Does Trump Miss The Point

On Tech Visas?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

There are apparently many jobs Americans won’t do. One is obviously the very high paying job of CEO of IT companies which seem to be headed by Hindus. While Americans were quite capable of inventing computers, the internet and all the IT accoutrements they are incapable of managing that which they have invented. At least until recently. The personnel of talent now come from outside the US which is incapable of producing anything other than dummies, at least of the male variety. Sometime in the recent past White males lost the ability to function but fortunately women and people of color are here to pick up the slack.

The country of choice for choosing the CEOs seems to be India. The Hindu mind that produced virtually nothing for the last three thousand years or so seems to be ideally suited to the computer sciences. So much so that Americans adequately performing tech jobs are now being fired, one presumes for incompetence to be replaced by Hindus or others who have surpassed White people in intelligence while in many cases according to Jason Riley are even paid more than the American morons they replace thus actually raising costs to their companies. One marvels that such super intellects have been hiding in India unused lo these many millennia. It took American genius to discover them in their lairs, give them a shave and new suit of clothes and get them on the job.

Mr. Riley writing in the venerable Wall Street Journal (8/17/16) gives us his thoughts in a piece he titles: Trump Misses the Point on Tech Visas. Obviously the President of the United States may be one of those jobs Americans won’t do along with picking grapes and basic construction. Indeed, our current Negro president was chosen because his skin isn’t White. While most Americans believe he has done a poor job, his signature legislation Obamacare is heading toward bankruptcy, the people in charge are convinced he has been the greatest president ever. Perspective is obviously involved.

Mr. Riley who is a senior fellow at something called Manhattan Institute is also a WSJ contributor. Those should be stellar credentials but Mr. Riley, perhaps a little too senior, is difficult to follow.

In yesterday’s times these H1B immigrants would have been called wage busters or scabs. While there are several instances of importing these workers to displace an already existing work force Mr. Riley chose for his illustration the Disney Co. of Orlando. Disney World is appropriately a fantasy world.

Choosing his words carefully Mr. Riley says that 250 American Disney tech workers were ‘furloughed’ to be replaced by 250 H1B workers while Mr. Riley doesn’t say from where a good guess would be that they are Hindus from India. Now, the word furlough means a leave of absence, applied especially to the military. Those 250 American workers were not furloughed, they were fired. They aren’t coming back while they were compelled to train their replacements. Mr. Riley glosses over this truth to avoid the obvious. The ability to do this is why he works for a ‘think tank.’

He explains further making even less sense: Something called the National Foundation for American Policy released a study, by whom and of what quality isn’t mentioned, but according to the study “Companies are not replacing long time employees with new workers doing the exact same jobs but rather replacing the employees with new systems in an attempt to perform the function in a more efficient way.’ In other words, these Hindus are far superior workers than the Americans.

Let us hope for Disney’s sake the attempt is successful. We are not informed who devised the new more efficient systems, one would be surprised they could have been inefficient Americans, whether from domestic or ‘outsourced’ sources but what is clear is that 250 Hindus replaced 250 American workers who apparently were too stupid to be retrained to the new more efficient system.

What is interesting here is that Disney accepted 250 employees sight unseen. They did not vett them themselves. Mr. Riley explains:

In reality [interesting word to use in the Disney fantasyland] hiring a contractor is often done through a competitive bidding process and the company doesn’t know beforehand whether or to what extent the winning bid will use H1B visa holders.

Competitive bidding? Mr. Riley doesn’t say on what basis the competition was defined but in business it is usually for the lowest possible price. The only reasonable conclusion is that in the bidding by various agencies it is to provide 250 qualified workers who will accept the lowest possible wage. But no, Mr. Riley say this is an unreasonable assumption.

US employers turn to high-skill immigrants for the same reason they turn to low skill immigrants… [that is the lowest possible wage] out of necessity. Foreign nationals who tend [they tend?] to be either more skilled or less skilled than the typical US worker.

So essentially Disney is getting a pig in a poke; 250 workers who may be more skilled or less skilled than the workers they are replacing, hence no gain in efficiency under any system, new or old. But they are replacing ‘typical’ American workers. (Perhaps at this point one can see Donald Trump scratching his head because he probably doesn’t understand.) ‘Typical’ seems confusing in any case. Obviously American universities have found Americans too stupid to teach because more than 70% of full time graduate students in electrical engineering and computer sciences of American universities are international students says Mr. Riley. Over the past three decades, college-degree holders outside the US have more than doubled while the US share of those with college degrees has declined by 30%. Has anyone asked why American college degree holders have declined? It would seem something to look into, don’t you think?   It would seem that something is going on. Discrimination?

I have trouble making any sense of Mr. Riley’s article and I’m not sure Mr. Riley is able to either. Certainly while Mr. Riley claims that Trump misses the point on tech visas nowhere in his article does he show reasons of Trump’s ignorance. After reading this article I doubt if Mr. Trump is any more enlightened.

The Wall Street Journal should be ashamed to print such incompetent articles as Mr. Riley’s. Of course Mr. Riley is an inefficient American brain worker who should, perhaps be replaced by a foreign worker using a new more efficient system.

I’m still voting Trump who, by my standards, has a better grasp on the nature of the problem’s facing us.

The Continuing Saga Of Trump

The Continuing Saga Of  Trump

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Cry Globalism! First the complaint against Trump was that he was an Isolationist in a Globalist world. Now it turns out that Trump has a better understanding of Globalism than his Liberal opponents.

It would appear that what Globalism meant to Liberals was smearing a thin veneer of Nationalist Americanism over the Globe and calling it Democracy. They appear surprised that they are being challenged by the much despised Putin of Russia. They don’t seem to grasp that Obama has sacrificed US supremacy and that on a global playing field the US isn’t even the first among equals.

Rather than saying that Putin is entering into US politics for global reasons why not say that Russian interests conflict with American interests and in global politics they are jockeying for position no differently than Democrats and Republicans in this election. There is no reason that an accord cannot be reached. Trump understands what Liberals don’t; it would be better for Russia and the US to work together rather than get involved in conflict. Of course Obama would like nothing better than to see Eastern Whites and Western Whites fight a war of annihilation that would completely destroy Western Civilization. What was that Sixties chant: Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civilization has got to go? Do you imagine that Negroes have changed their minds? OMG, did I say something racist? If I did then that’s the way it must be. Get over it!

While plumping for a war against the Russians Liberals crazily defend Moslems who are, in fact, seeking to destroy all other religions and societies that refuse to accept their god Allah. Liberals thus by encouraging Moslems work their own destruction.

Trump sees clearly our compatibility with the Russians and our incompatibility with the Moslems. There can be no more reasonable approach to the Moslem problem than not only barring the importation of more but the deportation of those that are here. Obama himself if not a Moslem is sympathetic to and partial to the Moslems. He favors them. Everything he has done since becoming president indicates this. He spent his formative years as a Moslem in Indonesia. His stepfather Lolo Soetoro saw to his indoctrination. The indoctrination seems to have taken.

Obama’s attitude will be followed by his protogee Hillary Clinton if she is elected. It is not improbable that Obama will be the directing power, the grey eminence, behind Clinton if by mischance she is elected. This is undoubtedly clear in political circles while surely known to Trump.

That is why the Dem-Rep Liberals fear a Trump presidency. He is going to upset their apple cart.

It is quite possible that a Trump-Putin agenda may evolve and follow thus uniting Eastern and Western White interests into a unity to which they belong.

If Americans have any sense at all they will vote Trump.

They will vote for their own preservation. One hopes they will forfend this racist bullcrap in which all discussions are framed. Suicide is for losers.

The Insincerity Of Khizr Khan

 

 

The Insincerity

Of Khizr Khan

by

R.E. Prindle

 

I thought the Khizr Khan thing would have died a natural death but since it hasn’t let me say a few things that seem to have been passed over. At the base of the issue the Khans are Human Traffickers in collusion with the Clintons and the King of the Saudi Arabians. The association has been very profitable for the Clintons who have received many lesser amounts as well as a 25 million dollar contribution to their trust from the Saudis. What does one do for someone that merits that much money? Something they considered very valuable. What was it? No one has asked the Clintons because the explanation might not go down so well.

The Clintons have known Khizr Khan for some time having received checks from him through his law firm. Khan himself facilitates or facilitated selling green cards to wealthy Moslems for 500,000. The green cards were good for the Moslem purchaser’s entire extended family. Thus Khan was the middleman in moving humans from the Middle East to the US. Their son, who I am sure was a patriotic deep dyed American, nevertheless joined the Army to get a free education after. His very wealthy parents who could easily have put him through the most expensive US college from the profits of their Human Trafficking thus are themselves scamming the US in what I would consider a less than patriotic way. Do the Khan’s have undivided loyalty to the US as they claimed? Not very likely.

Now, the Clintons pretend not to have not known about the Khans and their son until a staffer allegedly heard about their story contacting them to speak against Trump at the convention. What the basis of their request might have been isn’t clear. Why would the Clintons wish to conceal their friendship with the Khans? Obviously something is going on here but we are led to believe that the Khan’s hate Donald Trump for some unexplained reason and wished to take this opportunity to condemn him. What was the reason for their asking: Donald Trump have you ever read the Constitution? It had nothing to do with their son’s death in action in Iraq. Obviously it was because Trump threatened their Human Trafficking livelihood. It is a money related issue. Their Human Trafficking was threatened by Trump’s intent to ban Moslem immigration. Talk about coal miners losing their jobs, Khizn stood to lose a fortune.   How many green cards had he already sold? Loyalty to the US, faugh!

How many tens of thousands could he sell if not cut off?

Now, there is nothing in the Constitution that guarantees anyone a right to immigrate to the US. There is nothing in the Constitution that denies the US the right to refuse immigrants for any reason or to suspend immigration altogether. With a few exceptions the last has been done.

So, Mr. Khan, as the fine Constitutional scholar that you are can you point to the words that affirm anyone a right to immigrate into the US? Can you point to the words that say members of a religious class cannot be selectively excluded?

Mr. Khan, if you’re out there, we are waiting for your answers. Educate us, please.

Vote Trump

Hillary Clinton: Mad Mama Merkel’s Disciple

 

 

Hillary Clinton

Our Mad Mama Merkel

By

R.E. Prindle

 

The real bone of contention is this election is whether we will have an influx of a million Middle Eastern Moslems or not. The democrats define their opponents as unfeeling bigots, knuckle dragging morons who flunked out at kindergarten for refusing to allow such a disintegrating element into this country. There are many reasons to reject immigration of any kind none of which refers to religion and/or ethnicity but they do not concern us here.

The important thing here is that as the Moslems fifteen hundred years of history show they always come as conquerors. They mean to change the nature of any country they enter exclusively to their own religion, law, mores and customs. They are Judaism perfected. This is not open to question.

Clinton and the Dems are willing to accept the consequences that they most clearly recognize. Trump and his Party prefer the existing Western Culture of the US hence rejection of Moslem immigration.

There is no difference between the Moslem invasion of the US than the English invasion of post-Columbian North America.

In the English settlements in Virginia the Indian tribes on more than one occasion wiped them out. Was that an act of xenophobia or an act self-preservation? Unfortunately for the Indians English reserves were large and they kept coming. The consequence was that the Indians were wiped out.

In the Massachusetts colony the Wampanoags might easily have destroyed the English invaders but chose to aid them. Whether ‘xenophobes’ pushed to exterminate the invaders or not the consequence of their benevolence was the same as in Virginia. The Indians were overwhelmed.

Hillary, who must have misplaced any brain God gave her, refuses to learn from history so rather than refuse entry she sends planes to the Middle East to fly them here. Inevitable result? A repetition of the Indians with the English.

Do we have to look far to verify the consequences? No. Only across the Pond to the Germany of Mad Mama Merkel. Mama… the derogatory term the Moslems give to that silly woman.

Mad Mama has not only let in but kicked down the doors and waved the Moslems on. The result? Endless and increasing acts of violence, murder, and rape. Wholesale rapes in one day of thousands of German women in the city of Cologne. Mad Mama obviously hates her own sex or she is brutally letting the Moslems fuck them. Maybe Mad Mama is sexually repressed.

Does Hillary think the same won’t happen in the US. Of course not, she hopes it will. She’s going to encourage it just like Mad Mama. It is part of the Liberal ideology. Sarkozy of France wanted to pass a law requiring French women to fuck Africans. It was the only way to break down racial barriers for the amalgamation of races he said. Mad Mama belongs to the same ideology but rather than pass a law requiring German girls to fuck Moslems she gives Moslems carte blanche to rape them.

Is this Hillary’s plan for the US? She comes from the same ideological group as Mad Mama and Sarkozy so what else can be the plan?

So if you vote for the evil witch Hillary, disciple of Mad Mama Merkel, you are voting for the rape of American womanhood. May you suffer the consequences personally if you do.

 

Vote Trump