Listen To Donald Trump; Your Lives Depend On It

 

 

Listen To Donald Trump: Your Life Depends On It

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Since Trump began being briefed for the presidency, no matter how badly, the tenor of his speeches has changed dramatically. Perhaps the FBI has disclosed their private information on the machinations of Obama that they were unable to disclose under Obama’s thumb.

When Trump now announced that Obama has strategically placed one hundred thousand Mexican paramilitaries (Trump doesn’t use this term) he, Trump, says that he will as his first move arrest the whole lot. My impression is that this accusation is very, very serious. As Trump says, you, we, are not bigots, we are good people and as such have every right to protect our lives, our loved ones lives and our children’s lives.

You may be sure that many Moslem communities as well have been strategically placed so that on the signal all will rise as one. Knowing the danger of predicting the event it is in all likelihood very close, perhaps on the eve of the election or alternatively the eve of Trump’s inauguration. Remember that Obama has categorically said that Trump will not be president; take him at his word.

It behooves you to listen to what Trump is saying; he is telling you something, as much as he dares.

Despite what you may have been led to believe Trump is an honest candidate. He cares for the United States and its survival. Put your prejudice behind you, discard all the slander of the MSM, Hillary and the administration. You have been taken. Put your support behind Trump now. He is putting his life on the line for you and for our country. Make no mistake the next four three months will be the most critical the country has ever experienced.

Evil times await you if you don’t support Trump. The abyss yawns.

The Birth Of Two Nations

 

 

The Birth Of Two Nations

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In 1915 D.W. Griffith and Thomas Dixon Jr. released what is perhaps the most famous movie, silent or talkie, ever made. The movie that depicts the aftermath of the Civil War, that is Reconstruction, was the biggest spectacle ever produced to that time, and also the highest grosser.

The movie was addressed to the North. For the North the Civil War was a war of extermination intended to kill all the White Southerners. That they didn’t succeed is a mere accident of history. For instance, read War Crimes Against Southern Civilians by Walter Brian Cisco. After a hundred and fifty years later Southerners finally feel free to tell the truth. The book will help you understand Griffith’s Birth of a Nation.

Thus the nation Griffith and Dixon referred to was the unity of the Aryan Nation. The Birth was its hoped for reunification after the horrors of the Civil War. The plea was never to kill each other again; especially avoiding the genocidal horrors of Generals William Tecumseh Sherman and Phil Sheridan among many other Northern commanders.

Naturally the movie was seen as racial and racist and a great hue and cry was raised by Negroes and Jews but not by the men who fought the war either North or South. While the movie in many cases was viewed by participants and survivors of that great conflict, and thought to accurately represent the situation a barrage of defamation was directed at D.W. Griffith, the director, and Thomas Dixon, the writer.

Dixon who was a best selling author of talent and a good story teller was gradually turned into a racist monster having no place in American literature or culture. Both he and Griffith’s careers began a precipitous decline following the movie and both died penniless and in obscurity.

Now, a hundred years later in an effort to co-opt history a new film also titled Birth of a Nation has been written, directed and acted by Nate Parker. Nate is a Negro. His film deals with a slave uprising led by Nat Turner in Southhampton County, Virginia in 1831. The rebellion was a murderous, bloody, rapefest that ended as it must have once the surprise was over and the Whites organized. But, what is meant by Nate Parker’s filming the movie? Is it merely to mock Griffith and Dixon or is he calling for a unification of the present Negroes to exterminate present Whites?   In other words, a serious call for the birth of a Negro United States or Nation? The film certainly excites the Negro people to do battle with the White Demons. And that at a time when the Negroes are already working themselves into a lather finding excuses to kill, burn and loot.

The very people who denounce Griffith and Dixon now applaud Parker as the auteur of a fantastic picture. They little know that they are the projected victims of the film.

However Nate Parker has complicated the matter by having been tried for raping a White girl in college, sort of following Griffith and Dixon’s script that was denounced as defamatory.   The White girl is described as being unconscious, thus one imagines drugged, hence unable to give consent as Parker claims while having gratified his hatred of Whites on the girl’s body. Having gratified his hatred Parker invited his Black roommate into the room to have some too. So we have a gang rape.

So the Griffith film in which a Negro gratifies his lust on a White girl seems to have been reenacted by Parker even though the scene in Griffith’s film was called inaccurate and racist.

Parker, of course, represenst his rape of the girl as a mere youthful indiscretion and he’s put all that behind him; convenient for him although his victim subsequently committed suicide at the age of thirty. Collateral damage.   So let’s forget about the mistake and concentrate on Parker’s movie that calls for lots more murder and rape.

Let’s try to place Parker and his movie into a historical continuum. The Nat Turner uprising occurred in South Hampton County, Virginia in 1831 as noted. The uprising was not too far distant in time from the 1804 revolt of Toussaint L’Ouverture in Haiti which established the independence of Haiti from the French. Haiti was a major event in the consciousness of nineteenth century history. While Toussaint did not in any sense defeat Napoleon as some historians claim he did defeat troops of the Empire. The reaction among Whites was stupendous. Some feared an uprising in the US like that of Nat Turner other lauded Toussaint as the greatest military figure of all time surpassing Washington, Napoleon, Caesar and whoever. Just the greatest and that because he was a Negro. Matthew Clavin in his fine book Toussaint L’Ouverture and the American Civil War details the reaction to Toussaint’s victory. All the White men were massacred while the White women were given the choice of a horrible death or marriage to Negroes, but a real marriage not a mockery of one. Most women chose to submit to the Negroes.

The Whites not murdered during the Haitian Revolution fled to the nascent United States. While France had sold Louisiana to the US in 1803 New Orleans was still considered a French colony to which many of the slave owners repaired bringing their slaves with them. Many of the slave owners were mulattoes and Negroes thus New Orleans had a large corps of Negro slave owners at the time of the Civil War.

Others landed along the Gulf Coast so news of Haiti was general in the South among both slave owners and slaves. This Haitian rebellion then both incited Nat Turner and terrified the Whites. So, the result was murder, theft and rapine what it would seem Nate Parker is inciting with his movie. As far as rape goes he knows what he’s talking about.

Efforts are being made to prevent the theater release in October, not only by Whites but by Negroes also. This would seem wise. In the event of a Negro uprising that could occur before election time or at least inauguration that might seem to justify martial law and the continuation of Obama rule. Some worry about this and their worries may be justified. We’ll see. I fear that the US is now two nations and not one.

Vote Trump anyway.

Does Trump Miss The Point On Tech Visas?

 

 

Does Trump Miss The Point

On Tech Visas?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

There are apparently many jobs Americans won’t do. One is obviously the very high paying job of CEO of IT companies which seem to be headed by Hindus. While Americans were quite capable of inventing computers, the internet and all the IT accoutrements they are incapable of managing that which they have invented. At least until recently. The personnel of talent now come from outside the US which is incapable of producing anything other than dummies, at least of the male variety. Sometime in the recent past White males lost the ability to function but fortunately women and people of color are here to pick up the slack.

The country of choice for choosing the CEOs seems to be India. The Hindu mind that produced virtually nothing for the last three thousand years or so seems to be ideally suited to the computer sciences. So much so that Americans adequately performing tech jobs are now being fired, one presumes for incompetence to be replaced by Hindus or others who have surpassed White people in intelligence while in many cases according to Jason Riley are even paid more than the American morons they replace thus actually raising costs to their companies. One marvels that such super intellects have been hiding in India unused lo these many millennia. It took American genius to discover them in their lairs, give them a shave and new suit of clothes and get them on the job.

Mr. Riley writing in the venerable Wall Street Journal (8/17/16) gives us his thoughts in a piece he titles: Trump Misses the Point on Tech Visas. Obviously the President of the United States may be one of those jobs Americans won’t do along with picking grapes and basic construction. Indeed, our current Negro president was chosen because his skin isn’t White. While most Americans believe he has done a poor job, his signature legislation Obamacare is heading toward bankruptcy, the people in charge are convinced he has been the greatest president ever. Perspective is obviously involved.

Mr. Riley who is a senior fellow at something called Manhattan Institute is also a WSJ contributor. Those should be stellar credentials but Mr. Riley, perhaps a little too senior, is difficult to follow.

In yesterday’s times these H1B immigrants would have been called wage busters or scabs. While there are several instances of importing these workers to displace an already existing work force Mr. Riley chose for his illustration the Disney Co. of Orlando. Disney World is appropriately a fantasy world.

Choosing his words carefully Mr. Riley says that 250 American Disney tech workers were ‘furloughed’ to be replaced by 250 H1B workers while Mr. Riley doesn’t say from where a good guess would be that they are Hindus from India. Now, the word furlough means a leave of absence, applied especially to the military. Those 250 American workers were not furloughed, they were fired. They aren’t coming back while they were compelled to train their replacements. Mr. Riley glosses over this truth to avoid the obvious. The ability to do this is why he works for a ‘think tank.’

He explains further making even less sense: Something called the National Foundation for American Policy released a study, by whom and of what quality isn’t mentioned, but according to the study “Companies are not replacing long time employees with new workers doing the exact same jobs but rather replacing the employees with new systems in an attempt to perform the function in a more efficient way.’ In other words, these Hindus are far superior workers than the Americans.

Let us hope for Disney’s sake the attempt is successful. We are not informed who devised the new more efficient systems, one would be surprised they could have been inefficient Americans, whether from domestic or ‘outsourced’ sources but what is clear is that 250 Hindus replaced 250 American workers who apparently were too stupid to be retrained to the new more efficient system.

What is interesting here is that Disney accepted 250 employees sight unseen. They did not vett them themselves. Mr. Riley explains:

In reality [interesting word to use in the Disney fantasyland] hiring a contractor is often done through a competitive bidding process and the company doesn’t know beforehand whether or to what extent the winning bid will use H1B visa holders.

Competitive bidding? Mr. Riley doesn’t say on what basis the competition was defined but in business it is usually for the lowest possible price. The only reasonable conclusion is that in the bidding by various agencies it is to provide 250 qualified workers who will accept the lowest possible wage. But no, Mr. Riley say this is an unreasonable assumption.

US employers turn to high-skill immigrants for the same reason they turn to low skill immigrants… [that is the lowest possible wage] out of necessity. Foreign nationals who tend [they tend?] to be either more skilled or less skilled than the typical US worker.

So essentially Disney is getting a pig in a poke; 250 workers who may be more skilled or less skilled than the workers they are replacing, hence no gain in efficiency under any system, new or old. But they are replacing ‘typical’ American workers. (Perhaps at this point one can see Donald Trump scratching his head because he probably doesn’t understand.) ‘Typical’ seems confusing in any case. Obviously American universities have found Americans too stupid to teach because more than 70% of full time graduate students in electrical engineering and computer sciences of American universities are international students says Mr. Riley. Over the past three decades, college-degree holders outside the US have more than doubled while the US share of those with college degrees has declined by 30%. Has anyone asked why American college degree holders have declined? It would seem something to look into, don’t you think?   It would seem that something is going on. Discrimination?

I have trouble making any sense of Mr. Riley’s article and I’m not sure Mr. Riley is able to either. Certainly while Mr. Riley claims that Trump misses the point on tech visas nowhere in his article does he show reasons of Trump’s ignorance. After reading this article I doubt if Mr. Trump is any more enlightened.

The Wall Street Journal should be ashamed to print such incompetent articles as Mr. Riley’s. Of course Mr. Riley is an inefficient American brain worker who should, perhaps be replaced by a foreign worker using a new more efficient system.

I’m still voting Trump who, by my standards, has a better grasp on the nature of the problem’s facing us.

The Continuing Saga Of Trump

The Continuing Saga Of  Trump

By

R.E. Prindle

 

Cry Globalism! First the complaint against Trump was that he was an Isolationist in a Globalist world. Now it turns out that Trump has a better understanding of Globalism than his Liberal opponents.

It would appear that what Globalism meant to Liberals was smearing a thin veneer of Nationalist Americanism over the Globe and calling it Democracy. They appear surprised that they are being challenged by the much despised Putin of Russia. They don’t seem to grasp that Obama has sacrificed US supremacy and that on a global playing field the US isn’t even the first among equals.

Rather than saying that Putin is entering into US politics for global reasons why not say that Russian interests conflict with American interests and in global politics they are jockeying for position no differently than Democrats and Republicans in this election. There is no reason that an accord cannot be reached. Trump understands what Liberals don’t; it would be better for Russia and the US to work together rather than get involved in conflict. Of course Obama would like nothing better than to see Eastern Whites and Western Whites fight a war of annihilation that would completely destroy Western Civilization. What was that Sixties chant: Hey, hey, ho, ho, Western Civilization has got to go? Do you imagine that Negroes have changed their minds? OMG, did I say something racist? If I did then that’s the way it must be. Get over it!

While plumping for a war against the Russians Liberals crazily defend Moslems who are, in fact, seeking to destroy all other religions and societies that refuse to accept their god Allah. Liberals thus by encouraging Moslems work their own destruction.

Trump sees clearly our compatibility with the Russians and our incompatibility with the Moslems. There can be no more reasonable approach to the Moslem problem than not only barring the importation of more but the deportation of those that are here. Obama himself if not a Moslem is sympathetic to and partial to the Moslems. He favors them. Everything he has done since becoming president indicates this. He spent his formative years as a Moslem in Indonesia. His stepfather Lolo Soetoro saw to his indoctrination. The indoctrination seems to have taken.

Obama’s attitude will be followed by his protogee Hillary Clinton if she is elected. It is not improbable that Obama will be the directing power, the grey eminence, behind Clinton if by mischance she is elected. This is undoubtedly clear in political circles while surely known to Trump.

That is why the Dem-Rep Liberals fear a Trump presidency. He is going to upset their apple cart.

It is quite possible that a Trump-Putin agenda may evolve and follow thus uniting Eastern and Western White interests into a unity to which they belong.

If Americans have any sense at all they will vote Trump.

They will vote for their own preservation. One hopes they will forfend this racist bullcrap in which all discussions are framed. Suicide is for losers.

The Insincerity Of Khizr Khan

 

 

The Insincerity

Of Khizr Khan

by

R.E. Prindle

 

I thought the Khizr Khan thing would have died a natural death but since it hasn’t let me say a few things that seem to have been passed over. At the base of the issue the Khans are Human Traffickers in collusion with the Clintons and the King of the Saudi Arabians. The association has been very profitable for the Clintons who have received many lesser amounts as well as a 25 million dollar contribution to their trust from the Saudis. What does one do for someone that merits that much money? Something they considered very valuable. What was it? No one has asked the Clintons because the explanation might not go down so well.

The Clintons have known Khizr Khan for some time having received checks from him through his law firm. Khan himself facilitates or facilitated selling green cards to wealthy Moslems for 500,000. The green cards were good for the Moslem purchaser’s entire extended family. Thus Khan was the middleman in moving humans from the Middle East to the US. Their son, who I am sure was a patriotic deep dyed American, nevertheless joined the Army to get a free education after. His very wealthy parents who could easily have put him through the most expensive US college from the profits of their Human Trafficking thus are themselves scamming the US in what I would consider a less than patriotic way. Do the Khan’s have undivided loyalty to the US as they claimed? Not very likely.

Now, the Clintons pretend not to have not known about the Khans and their son until a staffer allegedly heard about their story contacting them to speak against Trump at the convention. What the basis of their request might have been isn’t clear. Why would the Clintons wish to conceal their friendship with the Khans? Obviously something is going on here but we are led to believe that the Khan’s hate Donald Trump for some unexplained reason and wished to take this opportunity to condemn him. What was the reason for their asking: Donald Trump have you ever read the Constitution? It had nothing to do with their son’s death in action in Iraq. Obviously it was because Trump threatened their Human Trafficking livelihood. It is a money related issue. Their Human Trafficking was threatened by Trump’s intent to ban Moslem immigration. Talk about coal miners losing their jobs, Khizn stood to lose a fortune.   How many green cards had he already sold? Loyalty to the US, faugh!

How many tens of thousands could he sell if not cut off?

Now, there is nothing in the Constitution that guarantees anyone a right to immigrate to the US. There is nothing in the Constitution that denies the US the right to refuse immigrants for any reason or to suspend immigration altogether. With a few exceptions the last has been done.

So, Mr. Khan, as the fine Constitutional scholar that you are can you point to the words that affirm anyone a right to immigrate into the US? Can you point to the words that say members of a religious class cannot be selectively excluded?

Mr. Khan, if you’re out there, we are waiting for your answers. Educate us, please.

Vote Trump

Hillary Clinton: Mad Mama Merkel’s Disciple

 

 

Hillary Clinton

Our Mad Mama Merkel

By

R.E. Prindle

 

The real bone of contention is this election is whether we will have an influx of a million Middle Eastern Moslems or not. The democrats define their opponents as unfeeling bigots, knuckle dragging morons who flunked out at kindergarten for refusing to allow such a disintegrating element into this country. There are many reasons to reject immigration of any kind none of which refers to religion and/or ethnicity but they do not concern us here.

The important thing here is that as the Moslems fifteen hundred years of history show they always come as conquerors. They mean to change the nature of any country they enter exclusively to their own religion, law, mores and customs. They are Judaism perfected. This is not open to question.

Clinton and the Dems are willing to accept the consequences that they most clearly recognize. Trump and his Party prefer the existing Western Culture of the US hence rejection of Moslem immigration.

There is no difference between the Moslem invasion of the US than the English invasion of post-Columbian North America.

In the English settlements in Virginia the Indian tribes on more than one occasion wiped them out. Was that an act of xenophobia or an act self-preservation? Unfortunately for the Indians English reserves were large and they kept coming. The consequence was that the Indians were wiped out.

In the Massachusetts colony the Wampanoags might easily have destroyed the English invaders but chose to aid them. Whether ‘xenophobes’ pushed to exterminate the invaders or not the consequence of their benevolence was the same as in Virginia. The Indians were overwhelmed.

Hillary, who must have misplaced any brain God gave her, refuses to learn from history so rather than refuse entry she sends planes to the Middle East to fly them here. Inevitable result? A repetition of the Indians with the English.

Do we have to look far to verify the consequences? No. Only across the Pond to the Germany of Mad Mama Merkel. Mama… the derogatory term the Moslems give to that silly woman.

Mad Mama has not only let in but kicked down the doors and waved the Moslems on. The result? Endless and increasing acts of violence, murder, and rape. Wholesale rapes in one day of thousands of German women in the city of Cologne. Mad Mama obviously hates her own sex or she is brutally letting the Moslems fuck them. Maybe Mad Mama is sexually repressed.

Does Hillary think the same won’t happen in the US. Of course not, she hopes it will. She’s going to encourage it just like Mad Mama. It is part of the Liberal ideology. Sarkozy of France wanted to pass a law requiring French women to fuck Africans. It was the only way to break down racial barriers for the amalgamation of races he said. Mad Mama belongs to the same ideology but rather than pass a law requiring German girls to fuck Moslems she gives Moslems carte blanche to rape them.

Is this Hillary’s plan for the US? She comes from the same ideological group as Mad Mama and Sarkozy so what else can be the plan?

So if you vote for the evil witch Hillary, disciple of Mad Mama Merkel, you are voting for the rape of American womanhood. May you suffer the consequences personally if you do.

 

Vote Trump

Donald Trump And The New Progressivism

 

 

Donald Trump

And The

New Progressivism

by

R.E. Prindle

 

An ideology has to be updated from time to time. Now is the time for a new take on an old ideology. Donald Trump is the president who can make it a reality.

Progressivism means an advance in the welfare of civilization. Through perhaps 1920 progress, significant progress, or the amelioration of civilization, had been made. World War I closed out that period. Since 1920 the application of the old progressivism has become increasingly regressive so that in today’s conditions the old progressivism is a failed ideology.

Whereas in the past European peoples including the US developed a system of Progressivism they shared with the rest of the world, educating the peoples of China, India et al. in its use, those peoples can now stand on their own feet; they no longer need Western help.

The New Progressivism then returns to the care and welfare of our own Western peoples. A tenet of the OP was Free Trade which became a gift to the Eastern peoples. Free Trade means merely that the lowest cost producer is the prime beneficiary. The money flows downhill to them. The low cost producers exploit their people who are naturally receiving the lowest possible wage. Low wages are the prime element of low cost production.

To protect what the West has built up then it is necessary to enact a wage differential bringing every producer’s wage to a certain level. For the West this means a tariff. Tariffs were considered regressive under the OP but become progressive under the New Progressivism. In fact, it is imperative they be enacted for our very survival.

Donald Trump appears to be the candidate who understands this as he has created the New Republican Party discarding the old.

The Democrats are hopelessly behind the times.

As regards Mexico and a border wall that may not be necessary if Trump is neo-progressive in dealing with the Mexicans. He must approach the Mexicans and advise them that if they don’t want a wall they must grant all Americans, both US and Canada, dual citizenship with full rights as Mexican citizens including the right to run for public office up to and including the presidency.

As the US has already generously built up the Mexican economy by sending industry South there is no reason for a border. The US wage rates would immediately prevail in Mexico. Any US residents of any national background would be free to move South to seek jobs as they wish. After all these are US plants and more will be built.

The increase in wages in Mexico would then provide a burgeoning market generating, along with the tariff that would then apply in Mexico also, prosperity North and South for twenty years or so.

Mexico would remain a separate administrative unit so as to prevent unwieldiness.

Trump could be the most progressive president ever known.

 

Vote Trump

On Wisconsin: Dump Paul Ryan

 

 

On Wisconsin: Dump Ryan

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Just to put things in perspective, Paul Ryan’s congressional seat is insecure. In his bid for reelection he is currently trailing his adversary by more than somewhat. There is an excellent chance he will not resume his seat in January. Could God be that good to us?

After behaving like a eunuch for the past eight years he now attempts to show whatever cojones he has left.

After kowtowing to and sucking off Massa Barry ‘Bama for the last eight years, ever the racist and ever loving that black skin, now that a White man is going to be in office Mr. (I use the term loosely) Ryan is bleating something about the three branches of the government, the Executive, the Judicial and the Legislative. He says his branch, the Legislative, is going to reassert its independence from the executive dictatorship of Black Skin Obama thus reclaiming the equality of the branches. I sure wish he’d learned about the equality of the branches eight years ago.

At least the pus does know he’s been a slave for the last eight years. Perhaps Hollywood would be interested in a script I’ve written up: Eight Years A Slave: The Paul Ryan Story. Of course Ryan doesn’t have a black skin so there might not be much of a market for such a film. Still, Shinola is still being made. Maybe….

So, now that it’s mano a mano with a Caucasian Wussy Paul affirms that Trump isn’t going to get away with the Executive Orders that Massa Barry ‘Bama did. Does this pool dud pay attention to what he’s saying? He says Congress let Massa Barry ‘Bama get away with being a dictator; a black skin can go where a White man can’t.

So, Paul ‘the Wuss’ Ryan is going to snipe at a President Trump in any way he can. That is if he’s returned to office in January. I place my faith in his Wisconsin constituency’s intelligence and acumen.

On Wisconsin. Give us a winning team.

The Coming Of Trump

 

 

The Coming Of Trump

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Former Montreal Canadien goalee Ken Drydan has written a thoroughly amusing essay in the 7/8/16 WSJ that he titles Trump And The Broad Street Bullies that purports to explain Trump’s success hitherto.

Ken tells the moral myth of the coming of the Philadelphia Flyers hockey team. An expansion team they were assigned the dreck of the league’s players that guaranteed a last place finish. Comes the Coach Fred Spero who Ken depicts as a sort of John the Baptist preceding the coming of the Christ or in another word, Trump.

Spero discarded all the old rules and taught his players to engage in maximum physical contact outside established custom. Hockey is rough enough under normal circumstances. Spero had a couple skilled players who got all the slap shots while the other players were beating up the opposition so badly that many opposition players refused to show up for games. The Broad Street Bullies as they became known bullied the team to two straight championships.

Then came the Montreal Canadiens, something like the Royal Mounted Police to put a stop to the New Age, as I read it, by being meaner and badder with a couple more skillful slap shot artists. The moral then, Big Bad Bully Donald Trump using the same tactics as the Broad Street crowd forces the saintly Party Regulars to follow Ken’s and the Canadien’s example to fight fire with fire. That’s Ken’s interpretation of the situation: The Devil vs. the Saints.

I wish to put before you a different scenario. In mine I cast Trump as Young King Arthur who pulls the mighty sword Excalibur out of the Stone and the Party Regulars as the Canadiens who try to discredit the real Arthur and prevent him from becoming King.

Young Trump made a career of pulling Excaliburs from stones. Beginning with the pittance of a million dollars loaned to him at interest by his doting father he built an empire of many billions.   (Reports of how many differ wildly but all agree, billions.)

As a rising young Mogul, Young Trump was courted by obsequious politicians who not able, apparently, to raise enough money from the Jews, for substantial contributions. Young Trump gave with an open hand. How open, his hands being small, may be argued.

Bowing and scraping, lauding Young Trump to the skies, the politicians backed out bowing low, with the money, until next time. Shamed and embarrassed at their own sycophancy they among themselves called Young Trump a clown and a fool.

Time passed, as it will, and Young Trump stacked up a few decades so that he became portly, but not as portly as Old King Cole, and visibly no longer young, but his hair remained good. A young man is gratified by women and flattery but as Trump passed the meridian in life he no longer needed flattery, however his eye for the ladies was undimmed.

As he said, idly fondling his new wife, the thought came into is mind, what next? Is this all there is? As he was completely satisfied with his new wife, and why not I might ask, he thought: I’ve got money, vast lands and a TV show, why shouldn’t I realize my destiny and become the president of the United States Of America? Hence, the coming of Trump emulating that of Arthur.

He had a collection of swords pulled from stones and thought these should be enough make his point. Oh, and one from a damsel called The Lady Of The Lake.

Yet, lo and behold, the Party Regulars were horrified at the idea of their rich Fool’s entering their turf. The now Fully Mature Trump was yet a political naif while having no reason to suspect the revulsion of what after all, were his impoverished vassals.

Further, laughing behind their shapely hands, they devised a plan of a number of so-called TV debates in which they would humiliate him so invidiously that Fully Mature Trump would realize his error and abandon his political fantasies.

Thus a great tournament was arranged on the turf of Faux Fox in which a general melee between Fully Mature Trump and the various candidates for the Top Job of the Nation would fight it out directed by a panel of judges led by the beauteous Princess Megan and two other knaves whose names have disappeared down the memory hole. The beauteous Princess Megan was much more memorable. Then she had a bad hair day and began to look like a young Alan Ladd. Not bad, but not the same thing. Unfortunately for the Princess she agreed to play the role of the Wicked Witch of the East.

Sneeringly she directed her first question at Fully Mature Trump: Mr. Trump, why are you an asshole? While visibly hurt at what he considered a betrayal Fully Mature Trump wearing two of his many swords in this myth of destiny, flexed his tiny hands and whipped out his left hand sword and symbolically sent Princess Megan’s head rolling down the aisle.

Now comes an old joke but I’m going to tell it anyway. I got it from the singer of the group Blood Rock.

With a quiet chuckle Fully Mature Trump gave the now dead Megan a moral lesson. He said: Megan, I always said that you were so stupid that if your brain was placed on the edge of a razor blade it would look like a BB rolling down a four lane highway.

That was cruel, but, it is a cruel world and it was him or her; besides she had taken the role of the Wicked Witch and, well, it might be said that Fully Mature Trump, the Knight of the Two Swords, gave her her just deserts.

That tournament that night announced the Coming of Trump.

He now has to win a few more tournaments but if his heart is pure he will have the strength of ten. Plus he should keep his eye out for a Merlin.

Vote Trump

The One who was to make his return and has.

Save Our Souls

 

 

Save Our Souls

by

R.E. Prindle

 

One is astonished at how thick Liberals are. During this campaign they have offered a never ending stream of insults at Donald Trump, not to mention the rest of we knuckledraggers, gun huggers etc. Trump has not only been insulted but the insults have been basely demeaning, did I use the word defamatory? That’s what I meant.

To insult someone running against a useless piece of baggage like Hillary Clinton takes a lot of chutzpah.

In their assumed sense of superiority one would think they’re dealing with an idiot child. Now, how does one react to truly hurtful reproaches by those who claim to be the most sensitive people on earth? You can’t get angry and bury yourself which is what they’re aiming at. Few people have given Trump credit for an amazing level of self-control. Rather than lash back he reacted by jokes that are just too subtle for the Liberal intelligence. They don’t get it.

Witness his sly parodies of the Levy Bread ads of the Sixties, while using a solid six point star just as others such as Disney have and being savaged by brutes who using their famous double standard of Good for us but Bad for you. A six point star is not the so-called Star of David. The so-called Star of David is actually an occult symbol indicating the Above and Below. It was appropriated by the Jews as their special symbol sometime in the Middle Ages. To make a fuss over Trump’s use of it only demonstrates how thick they really are.

If it were possible to believe the preposterous one would be the unbelievably insulting question put to Trump that if he is elected in November does he intend to assume the office? I guess one can believe the preposterous. It’s open season now. Can anyone understand the depth and breadth of such an insult? Can anyone understand the hurt that the Trump had to swallow? Can anyone understand the depth of his contempt when he refused a direct answer and laughingly replied: You’ll have to wait and see.

In the Liberals contempt for Trump, they couldn’t even see that he was putting them on.

Only we can save ourselves from a perpetual servitude to these Liberal thugs. The question really is, will they allow Trump to be sworn in, or will they reject the voice of Democracy? All their blather about the rule of law is just that, bushwa.

Save Our Souls

Vote Trump