President Trump And The Lost Election

President Trump And The Lost Election


R.E. Prindle


(The book of) Genesis refer(s) back to primitive beliefs held by the Hebrews. For them in fact the human soul was not immortal, and the sole function of religion was to establish privileged relations between humans and God, in order to have as long and happy a life as possible. The dogma of immortality and the soul entered the Jewish religion at a fairly late date and is still subject to debate. During the time of Jesus, only the Pharisees and Essenes accepted it. The origin of the belief can obviously be found in Greek philosophy, which itself has been subject to heavy Eastern influence.

All of this boils down to the problem of evil being extremely simplified in the Bible: Jews faithful to the pact sealed with the Eternal God represent good, while other peoples, as well as Jews who are unfaithful to the covenant, represent evil.

Jean Markale,

The Church Of Mary Magdalene


Explaining the Liberal mind is one of the most necessary tasks of our time. They are, in fact, a species of religious faith quite divorced from considerations of reality. Their minds are impervious to reason, seemingly based on a kind of divine revelation.

As a religion they are a species of the Semitic belief system begun by the ancient Hebrews as in the quote from Jean Markale above.

Jean Markale is French of Breton ancestry, a scholar of religious evolution. He has contributed to the religious beliefs surrounding the Celtic myths of King Arthur. As such he has uncovered the core religious beliefs of today’s Liberal faith.

Markale’s understanding of the Jewish myth is as concise and accurate as any I have seen while accurately reflecting my own understanding. He defines an outstanding example of the origin of bigotry. To understand the Jewish fallacy one has to understand their position in the ancient world. According to their literary remains the Hebrews were a savage brutal people exterminating their way from Mesopotamia to Egypt and back to Palestine. Genocide was just their way and they made no excuses about it. Offended because the Amalekites refused them passage through their territory the Jews returned decades later to exterminate them.

At the same time the proto-Jews, the Hebrews, according to their writings, were always a subordinate people even, as they tell it, slaves in Egypt. Once back in Palestine they were in a backwater, flyover place in current Liberal terms, a bunch of Deplorables to quote Hillary Clinton. Then, first the Assyrians came, defeated them and transported the legendary Ten Lost Tribes, who have been reported from every location on earth.

After the Assyrians left the Babylonians came and carted the last two tribes of to Babylon. The captivity is ably portrayed by the biblical writers Isaiah and Ezekiel. While the Jews had grandiose notions of themselves and their temple in Palestine they quickly realized the poverty of their pretenses, both intellectual and material among the stupendous splendors of Babylon. It was then they made the fateful decision to oppose the nations of the Earth by declaring themselves the Selector’s choice anointing themselves as a chosen people to determine good and evil.

As Jean Markale points out, as the chosen people they thought themselves the personification of virtue while all others were the same of evil. Thus Semitism and anti-Semitism came into the world. While tens of thousands of pages have been wasted trying to explain the evil of negating the Jewish will it is explained quite simply and easily as those who are not Jewish. As the Jewish bible says, the Lord will bless those that bless the Jews and curse those who curse them. In other words: two fingers to you Jack.

Born at that time was the idea of good gentiles and bad gentiles. But, when the great Jewish uprising of the first and second centuries occurred when Jews committed incredible massacres in Egypt and Cyprus, the great Jewish sage Simeon Ben Yohai was asked whether the ‘good gentiles’ should be spared the good Rabbi replied: Kill them all. That is, genocide. This is the foundation of modern Liberalism.

In the fifteenth century AD Gutenberg invented movable type and began the mass production of books at relatively affordable prices. Just as an aside, today’s Easton Press has just published a facsimile of Gutenberg’s bible. It is massive. While Easton’s is bound with a cover, Gutenberg’s came not only unbound and no cover but with no pagination. While Gutenberg came up with moveable type he didn’t bother to invent punctuation marks and spacers between words. Not only is the language Latin but the typeface is obscure and difficult to read. So, the page is double columned into two nearly solid black blocks.

A few decades later Tyndale published an English language copy. I haven’t seen that. The upshot of that was that while not universally owned the bible was accessible for independent study. The eye became as potent as the ear; no longer did one have to rely on a reading by a priest.

The result of Gutenberg’s innovation was that an already Judaized mind was even more Judaized and in a location such as East Anglia the Torah became so beloved that the East Anglians quickly adopted the role of the Chosen People. The whole of the Jewish baggage was assumed by the East Anglians. They modeled their lives on the biblical scripture, even adopting the brutality of genocide. Fired up by the spirit of Judaism they killed the English King, Charles I, revolted against the non-chosen people of England and successfully established a Jewish style dictatorship proscribing all but their own beliefs.

At the same time these now bigots began to colonize the North American continent in order to establish a pure theocratic State. Thus the notion of an infallible good people surrounded by evil others. Hillary Clinton in our time was to give them their own designation of Deplorables. The flyover country between the two US coasts filled with Deplorables became a waste land of primitive savages to the Liberal mind.

As derivatives of the Jews, being a Semitic religion, the Liberals naturally became a dependency of the Jews who had in the years around the turn of the twentieth century basically colonized the United States while beginning their ascension as governors and imposing their mores on the ‘anti-Semites,’ the other.

The Jews formed terrorist units like the Anti-Defamation League, the NAACP etc. These units then established norms such as Jews good, anti-Semitism evil; Negroes good, racism evil (and only Whites can be racists). The Liberals then adopted these norms as articles of faith thus forming a coalition of White Liberals, Negroes, Jews and eventually any dissident group such as homosexuals and, even more bizarrely, transsexuals. They then called this coalition, their democracy.

After WWI new technologies for propaganda such as radio, talking moving pictures and eventually TV came into existence the Liberal Coalition succeeded in establishing an authoritarian government reminiscent of George Orwell’s 1984 that through the use of double speak and Political Correctness discredited or silenced anyone not in lock step.

Thus, using the attack on NYC’s Twin Towers, World Trade Center, as a lever, pressure was increased through the Bush and Obama administrations to establish a full fledged dictatorship. Obama using race as a cover brought the plan nearly to fruition. His designated successor Hillary Clinton was poised to spring the trap.

But a funny thing happened on the way to the forum. The designated Republican candidate was another Bush, Jeb Bush from Florida. But the Lib Coalition ignored an improbable corner in which lurked a candidate so incredible that he was the scorned of the scorned. He wasn’t even an impossibility in Lib eyes, he was considered a total political non-entity below serious consideration.

This was the reality TV star and mega real estate builder Donald Trump.

To the Coalition Trump wasn’t even a bad joke, there was nothing remotely funny about him. He was ridiculous. However, in the flush of their success to the end of the Obama occupation the coalition had ignored the increasing resentment of the very people on whose votes they depended. Surrounded by yea sayers they ignored the fact that their following was confined to a few population Liberal Coalition strongholds like NYC and California.

Donald Trump may have seemed like a buffoon, may even have been one, but, if so, he was a savvy buffoon. He brushed Jeb Bush aside. In his campaign he essentially gave up the Liberal population centers and went after voters that not only did the Coalition despise but they actually said so repeatedly over the controlled media of the entire nation. Their candidate, Hillary Clinton, sneered at those voters as deplorable people. The upshot was that Trump won over three thousand counties while Clinton won fewer than sixty. The anomaly was that these fifty plus counties, heavily Liberal, gave Clinton the popular vote but the three thousand plus counties gave Trump the Electoral College and the Presidency.

Trump had cannily formed his own Coalition of many dissident groups from despised and persecuted Christians to, if you can believe this, biker groups. As Jack Johnson’s mother said: He said he would bring home the bacon and he did.

Note: Strange as it may seem the boxer Jack Johnson, the first Negro heavyweight champion, has been all but forgotten. A current singer by the name of Jack Johnson is all a large percentage of the population knows by that name. I refer, of course, to the turn of the twentieth century boxer, Jack Johnson.

So, Trump’s great unforgiveable offence is that like Warren G. Harding in 1920 he has disrupted the Liberal program and threatens severe damage if he is allowed to succeed and place like minded politicians in power for the next twenty years. Just as Liberals were pushing a Communist agenda in 1920 so today they are pushing an agenda of unlimited immigration.

Harding quashed Communist hopes within six months of being elected ruining Lib hope for the twelve years before FDR brought them to influence in 1933. It may take Trump slightly longer to stifle unlimited immigration but he seems in a fair way to do it.

As there are only two ways to stop the Trump Redemption, murder or economic collapse they will probably choose the latter. After nearly a hundred years of mass murder by the various Communist regimes the Liberals seem to be opposed to killing although it was undoubtedly used against Harding. Economic collapse which was used to get Hoover out of office to the incalculable harm of the American people we seem to see the beginning of the use of the tactic against Trump now. As Trump has claimed credit for the rise in the stock market since his election and if it continues through 1918 voters will almost certainly return Republican candidates to congress in that election. It is important for the Libs to sink the market for the year. It matters little how people suffer to the Liberals so long as they can regain power.

The real challenge will be the mid-term elections. If they can fill the Houses with Democrats they will be able to contain and stifle Trump. The danger here is that they will use economic means to scuttle the near certain prosperity Trump’s methods are bringing. The Fed which is completely outside presidential or legislative control can easily shoot the interest rate up, which they have already begun to destroy the stock market and whatever other shenanigans they may have up their sleeves. They will undoubtedly invent sufficient justification for raising the discount rate after twenty years of punishing a certain class of people with a near 0 interest rate.

Remember, the Fed is a private corporation in the hands of certain Jewish banking firms. The Fed is outside government control. The next few months until the ’18 elections are going to be critical. Get the Conservative vote out in ’18.


Shumer Shutdown And Pres. Trump

CFR’s Foreign Affairs Magazine Announces

Trump’s ‘Lucky Year’ Is To End.


R.E. Prindle

The Council On Foreign Relations is finally putting its cards on the table in an article published in its magazine Foreign Affairs. The article was scheduled for the March-April issue but the CFR found it important enough to release it in advance on the internet. Thus the article will be free for one week beginning on 1/20/18. Can it be a coincidence that the article was released on 1/20 on the eve of the Shumer Shutdown of the government?

The article is titled Trump’s Lucky Year: Why The Chaos Can’t Last by Eliot A. Cohen and admits that the Pres.’ first year has been a success but that his ‘luck’ has run out now. The CFR wants a return to the seventy year post-war agenda. The Pres. has upset that agenda and will continue to destroy its foundations and will succeed if allowed to continue in office unobstructed.

The CFR has always gone to great lengths to remove presidents from office who won’t follow their program. The CFR was founded in 1921 to advance the socialistic program of Woodrow Wilson. The first hindrance came when Warren G. Harding was elected in 1920. While he hinted that he might advance Wilson’s program and bring the US into the League of Nations he didn’t follow through.

Under strange circumstances Harding died two years into his presidency. While the conditions of his demise are still undetermined I have no doubts that the CFR removed him. It was believed that Harding’s lackluster VP, Calvin Coolidge, would be easily defeated in 1924. Such did not turn out to be the case and Coolidge lived to pass the presidency on to Herbert Hoover in 1928.

The Federal Reserve had been building toward a stock market crash during what was called the Coolidge Prosperity and six months into the Hoover presidency the Fed pulled the plug plunging the country into twelve years of agonizing economic misery salvaged only by two massive world wars, one in Europe and one in the Pacific, that is, Asia.

‘Lucky’ Trump’s second year bids fair to be as or more successful as he barrels ahead with his own program that negates that of he CFR’s. It would appear that assassination is not to be considered. However the 2018 congressional elections that the CFR imagines will give them an overwhelming majority in both houses would stultify Trump’s presidency placing him in the CFR’s hands. The best that Trump could hope for would be Hoover’s fate.

To achieve this, given the fair omens for the Pres.’ second year they have to follow the Hoover scenario and sabotage what bids to be the Great Trump Prosperity.

Therefore, can it be a coincidence that this article was rushed to advance free publication on the very eve of the Shumer Shutdown of the government? CFR, Cohen written article, Shumer Shutdown. The article had to be planned and written at least two or three weeks before the Shumer Shutdown thus it follows that the Shumer Shutdown was planned as a ploy to scuttle Trump some time ago..

The plan shows how little the CFR, Dems, the Left, care for the welfare of the voters of the United States. The Shumer Shutdown has begun. The Pres. cannot fold and probably the CFR will carry it to great extremes placing the economy in jeopardy not unlike the Great Stock Market Crash of 1929. In fact, the key point of the incipient Great Trump Prosperity has been that startling advance of the stock market. That means that something over 50% of the public that owns securities has already improved their finances considerably and bid fair to improve further. That means that the Pres.’ base has improved considerably. There can be little doubt that substantial numbers of immigrants have invested and benefited so they may be reluctant to give up their gains by not voting Trump in ’18.

Thus, the CFR is willing to risk a stock market crash, one that is almost certain now, while putting in jeopardy the welfare of all the peoples resident in the US and perhaps all the peoples of the world. This is the madness of the CFR.

The Pres. cannot give in without destroying his presidency now and it is possible that the CFR will not in complete contempt of every living US resident, possibly every person in the world.

CFR, Cohen, Shumer Shudown. Those behind this incipient disaster should be clear to all.

The Future Of President Donald Trump

The Future Of President Donald Trump


R.E. Prindle


The Democrats are in a bind. They have a president they despise who if he is allowed to succeed will destroy their whole agenda. Not since Herbert Hoover defeated their designated candidate, Al Smith, have they faced a bleaker future.

The Democrats had captured the presidency in 1912 when a divided Republican Party was defeated by a decidedly minority candidate Woodrow Wilson. Wilson recorded only slightly more votes than an almost equally split vote between the Party candidate, Taft, the insurgent candidate T. Roosevelt. In other words the combined Republican vote was a landslide endorsement of Republicans.

Wilson, as any Democrat, was sure that God’s own wisdom flowed through his brain. He thought himself virtue incarnate. Sure that he was the only one able to guide the nation he intended to run for a third term in 1920. His connection with God’s brain was severed when his own was paralyzed by a stroke.

The Democrats had no good backup candidate so the Republicans waltzed in with a candidate little more popular with the Dems than our own Donald Trump, Warren G. Harding. Harding, like Trump, refused to follow the Liberal agenda while restoring prosperity to the nation.

Harding died mysteriously, succeeded by his colorless VP Calvin Coolidge who was thought to be a sure loser. Contradicting the pundits Coolidge surprised, capturing the presidency on his own. His presidency was known was known as the phenomenal Coolidge Prosperity. A New Era with a car in every garage and two chickens in every pot.

Coolidge chose not to run for re-election and that brought Herbert Hoover, one of the greatest of Americans, to the fore. He easily routed the Dem Al Smith. Prosperity, a Republican prosperity, was at its peak. If that continued it was certain that Hoover would be re-elected and after him probably another Republican for another eight long years. The future looked dim for the Dems.

Only a great economic disaster could bring the Republicans down; the Federal Reserve easily handled that, engineering the Stock Market Crash of 1929. while others interfered with Hoover over the next three years preventing his ability to pull the country from the Great Depression. A then nearly, or actually, incompetent Democrat by the name of Franklin Delano Roosevelt took Hoover’s place thus keeping the country in Depression for seven long years and then he dragged the country into a totally destructive war that could easily have been avoided and next he blew the peace.

Thank you, Democrats.

In our time the Democrat Barack Obama led the country into a ruinous situation attempting to abort capitalism. The Dems under Obama had all but succeeded and would have succeeded if Hillary Clinton had not been out maneuvered by the unexpected and unwanted candidate, Donald Trump.

Now, as with Warren G. Harding, it appears that President Trump is leading the country into a prosperity to rival that of the Coolidge prosperity. The fear of the Dems is that if allowed to succeed Trump will be reelected while the future may be lost to the Dems for twenty years or more. They cannot let this happen. Thus, they may plunge the country into another horrendous depression to discredit the President as with Herbert Hoover or, failing that, an assassination as with Warren G. Harding.

They have furiously dug a hole for themselves in trying to set up some sort of impeachment process even though the President has committed no high crimes or misdemeanors. The whole charge seems to be that he was not their chosen candidate and had no right to win.

In an attempt to weaken the President they are now going after a key advisor Steve Bannon trying to discredit him in the President’s eyes and divide him from the President. This must not be allowed to happen. No machination against the President can be allowed to be taken seriously. An uncritical foul must be called as an instinctive reaction. Smear the Dems back.

Track down every Dem elected or candidate and expose their peccadilloes, sexual or economic, they all have them. Unprovable sex violations have proven to be most viable as witness the Republican Roy Moore of Alabama. Go after their wives, many affairs are hidden there.

Be aggressive not passive, this is a war to the end, attack and defend simultaneously. Be anonymous if possible. Deny everything.

Jeff Bezos- The Seattle Great Satan

Jeff Bezos- The Seattle Great Satan


R.E. Prindle


The tale has been told. The Alabama election is over. Judge Roy Moore has been turned back. Jones didn’t do it nor all the Negroes collected and bussed to the polls. No, ‘Bamans didn’t have anything to do with it. To find the man who singlehandedly beat the Judge you have to go to Seattle, Washington, the offices of Amazon, Inc. and sitting behind that big mahogany desk, Mr. Jeff Bezos. The Devil in disguise.

A couple years back Jeff Bezos bought the nearly defunct Washington Post Newspaper. Paid big money for it too. At them I asked myself why he did that. What was his plan to turn it around. He didn’t have a plan turn it around, he didn’t even change the format; if anything the paper was more Liberal than ever, staffed by the same nerds.

It did occur to me somewhen along the way that Jeff Bezos was grooming himself to run for President. Bezos is a world beater; a genius of some merit, he wants to be Master of the World; unscrupulous as the devil as he always gets around any rules that might slow him down.

The Judge Roy Moore candidacy shows us exactly why he bought the Post. Ever unscrupulous, he bought himself a slander machine, a defamation factory, a political slaughter house. The Post was unfeelingly, not critical, in its condemnation of candidate Trump. As the Post goes so must go its owner, Jeff Bezos.

Judge Roy is a real bete noir of the CFR, he is opposed to their agenda at every stop. They have tried to kill his career at each step. They have removed him from office because of his religion. No, he’s not Moslem, not a Scientologist, nobody has ever called him a Jew, no none of those: he’s the most despised of all, a bottom of the barrel damnable Christian. I don’t want you to get the idea that I’m religious, Defender of the Faith or anything like that. I’m not religious but that doesn’t mean I’m not anti-Christian. No. I’m also anti-Moslem and anti-Jewish while I don’t think much of Hinduism or any of those touchy-feely, warm and fuzzy outfits also.

So, going in Judge Roy had even more than three strikes against him; he was an entire side.

But, damn that son-of-a-bitch, here he was running for the Senate and a cinch to win. What the hell? Well, there sat Jeff Bezos, sometime richest man in the world, sitting behind the mahogany in his office in Seattle or, perhaps, roving his hundreds of thousands acre Texas ranch saying to himself, I’ve got to stop hat no good son-of-a-bitch and I know how to do it. I’ve got the right tool for the job.

I don’t know hat Amazon has a secret service but I’m sure they do, so he sent his sleuths down to ‘Bama to find some dirt or create. From the looks of that Senior yearbook it looks more like created. Anyway, as proof that she’d been molested forty years ago by Judge Roy she produced an inscription in her yearbook signed by Judge Roy. It looks like she presented it to him at some event, political or otherwise, held at some place called The Olde Hickory House, dated 1977.

Now, Judge Roy signed it something like ‘To a lovely girl.’ The woman (I don’t mention her name to protect her from possible harassment) commemorated his event by adding the place and date so she wouldn’t forget.

Jeff Bezos then published the story that Judge Roy was a pedophile and racist. The girl must have been all of eighteen and dizzy from standing next to the great Alabama blossoming legend, and that may the closest she ever got.

What defeated Judge Roy was that inscription in that yearbook that Jeff Bezos unscrupulously published with no fear of being brought to account for bearing false witness.

I got it! I know why Mr. Bezos bought the Washington Post. He’ll be our Democratic candidate in 2020 and he has one of the two most prestigious papers in the US to promote his interests and defend them.

The Pres. should call on his Republican buds to give Jeff Bezos the Bill Gates treatment. Keep him busy in Washington for a few months so he can’t run his Empire so effectively. Might be a lesson well learned.

History Good And Bad

History Good And Bad:

Steve Bannon Attacked By Doug Irwin


R. E. Prindle


Hot stuff in the WSJ today (7/20/17). Douglas A. Irwin contributed a piece he titled Steve Bannon’s Bad History. Doug is apparently a big deal from Dartmouth with several learned tomes dealing with free trade to his credit.

Through no fault of his own his fame had escaped me till now. We have a clever double entendre in his title.   It can be interpreted as Steve has a malodorous past or, as the article makes clear, a weak grasp of history. From the title I thought the former but fortunately I sought further enlightenment in the body of the piece and learned differently. Is that called research?

Doug is critical of Steve’s ‘faulty’ thinking concerning the tariff issue. His highlight blurb blazons, ‘Immigration and rapid industrialization – not tariffs – made the nineteenth century economy great.’ I take exception to the blurb.

While it may be arguable, the modern economic nineteenth century didn’t begin until after the Civil War. And the economy wasn’t that great in the remaining thirty-five years of the century that included the near collapse of society in the crash of 1873, and that was worldwide, and the equally horrendous crash of 1893. Between the two of them they consumed at least ten of the thirty-five years.

However, even with 1873 and 1893 the industrial base expanded enormously. Time were tough but not for everybody.

Immigration and rapid industrialization can also be written as cheap unskilled labor and amazing scientific and technological discoveries. The century or latter part of it was built on steel rails and high powered locomotives and starvation slave wages paid for unskilled labor.


I’ve been working on the railroad,

Sleeping on the ground,

Eating saltine crackers

Ten cents a pound.


Causes for great pride and no pride at all. History is uneven.

The tariff that restricted European competition, the rest of the world was of no account at the time, facilitated rapid growth as it provided the sufficient profits to develop industries. Believe it or not the US prided itself on its high wage structure, immigrants and underpaid unskilled labor aside. Somebody had to buy all that wonderful stuff. Short life light bulbs weren’t all that cheap.

Doug may think tariffs didn’t help but, perhaps he should tell that to the current Chinese. They don’t bother with tariffs they just forbid foreign competition as they build up their industries often with pirated technology. As Doug ought to know the Chinese are famous for hacking computers and stealing trade secrets.

I know it is politically incorrect to point out these obvious facts but, what the hell, the truth is the truth. But, no defense.

Steve’s history may not be all that good but it may equal Doug’s.

President Trump On The Discard Pile

President Trump On The Discard Pile


R.E. Prindle


When you’re stuck in Juarez,

And it’s Eastertime too,

And your negativity fails you,

And gravity don’t pull you through…

Bob Dylan


It is clear at this point that Pres. Trump is going to be discarded. The process by which it will be done may be becoming clear. First he must be discredited in the eyes of his constituency so that sympathy for him is destroyed. DACA, the Wall, Immigration, the renunciation of the will of the people who elected him will be essentially the final straw while at the same time being the Left’s renunciation of democracy. The CFR triumphant.

What is the How?

Let us review the 1916 election between Wilson and Hughes. It was a very close election, not unlike the 2016 election, and Wilson actually thought he had lost. It was three days later when the results were determined that he knew he found himself still president. In those days the inauguration was in March. The World War was in progress and Wilson deemed it important that effective leadership be continuous in case he did lose. He therefore devised a plan so that Hughes could seamlessly succeed him according to the Constitution.

Thus, following the succession in case of the President’s death or incapacity was and is to the VP, then to the Secretary of State. In Wilson’s case the VP would resign, the serving Secretary of State would resign and the President would appoint Hughes to succeed him then resign himself. Hughes thus being elevated immediately to the office.

In 1916 the plan wasn’t needed. Let us transpose the plan to the present. Trump is to be given a life or death choice, it probably has already happened, to resign or die.

Trump’s situation can be compared to that of President Harding who won the 1920 election placing him in opposition to the League of Nation forces. Not to be denied, Harding died of mysterious symptoms two years into his presidency. It was assumed that the colorless VP, Calvin Coolidge, could be swept aside in 1924. Such proved not to be the case so the League forces had to wait for the 1928 election where they were disappointed again by the election of Herbert Hoover. Hoover was discredited by the staged stock market crash of 1929 and then manhandled for the duration of his presidency, much as Trump has been manhandled, opening the way for FDR.

Now, after Trump has disillusioned his constituency sufficiently Pence will resign as VP. By my understanding Pence has always been a stooge of the CFR and will perform his role without a problem. The succession then passes to Secretary of State Tillerson. Trump has already renounced his control of the military to Mattis and has delegated his powers as President to Tillerson at State. Tillerson has been given what is in effect a Power of Attorney to act in the President’s name. Tillerson then in the affairs of State is already the de facto President. That means he has the full approval of the CFR. The transmission has been seamless.

Well, that’s in the eyes of the CFR not mine, and not in the eyes of the majority of Americans who will then, finally, realize that they have been taken for a ride. Their will has been betrayed by a cabal.

The CFR would do well to pay attention to what’s happening to the attendance of professional football over the Kaepernick fiasco. Those empty seats will not likely be soon filled. The NFL has committed suicide by not responding appropriately to majority opinion.

As with the NFL the connection between the people and the US Government in Washington DC will be broken; all cooperation will cease. The country will be adrift. The government’s only choice will be to try to rule by force or terror.

Beware the consequences of thwarting or removing President Trump; the end game is at hand.

Comey Of The FBI And The Dark Government

Comey of the FBI

And The Dark Government


R.E. Prindle


Since Pres. Trump’s election a ‘Dark Government’ has become a topic of conversation. There may indeed be a dark government, perhaps several. Ex-Pres. Obama is making a fool of himself by leading one as he interferes with Pres. Trump’s administration. Dark Government?   Indeed, maybe more than one.

The government of the US is a vast sprawling project where many duchies ruled by ‘warlords’ may exist.

Comey of the FBI in his congressional testimony may have inadvertently uncovered one, to which he belongs, the IC Community. Intelligence Community of different agencies. As Comey of the FBI describes it an IC agency had possible information of a salacious but unconfirmed nature about then Citizen Trump that occurred or may not have occurred, after all this was an unconfirmed rumor, many years ago.

The salacious, as we all know salacious means smutty, dirty, nasty, titillating, rumor was that Trump as a private citizen, completely unrelated to his present position, peed on a Russian prostitute in Moscow, Russia. In the annals of perversity how horrible is peeing on someone? American clowns gather on a hotel balcony beer in one hand and dick in the other and pee on a crowd below while laughing uproariously.

As a sign of contempt in concert with fellow conspirators some guy gets behind a victim and pees on his pantleg. That’s a big joke of the practical kind where only the perps are laughing. There must be numerous more examples in the annals of peeing. For all I know the government may at some time have spent a quarter million dollars to commission a study on the subject.

Nevertheless, the assembled chiefs of the IC Community gathered to discuss what to do about this unconfirmed rumor. The IC could possibly have leather bound volumes numbering a hundred or more of unconfirmed rumors. Who runs major investigations of unconfirmed rumors? Apparently no one but the assembled IC chiefs of which Comey of the FBI was one.

Probably giggling wildly the assembled Chiefs have to determine who is going to carry the news from Langley to the White House. Perhaps they spun a bottle to determine who but in any event the lot fell to Comey of the FBI.

Whether Comey ever gave the Pres. the news of the unverified rumor or not isn’t clear. Comey in his testimony gives no indication of what the rest of his conversation with the Pres. was about because the Pres. out of the blue struck him dumb by asking where his loyalty lay. Why did the Pres. ask him that?

Is it possible that Comey of the FBI had just relayed this salacious but unverified rumor to the Pres.? Wouldn’t this cast some doubt about Comey’s loyalty in the Pres.’ mind? Would it be unusual to ask: Why are you telling me this? How important can an unverified rumor be?

Let us suppose, I don’t know how he obtained the rumor, some Trump hating journalist learned of this, had this unverified rumor published. Wouldn’t the word of the assembled Chiefs of IC calling it nonsense be enough to discredit the journalist and quash the rumor? I think so. There must be something deeper going on here. In my opinion the reputation of Comey of the FBI is destroyed, not Pres. Trump’s.

A Review: Peggy Noonan: What Comey Told Us About Donald Trump

A Review:

Peggy Noonan,

What Comey Told Us About Donald Trump


R.E. Prindle


This is a review of the Comey/Trump Affair around Peggy Noonan’s WSJ article in the Wall Street Journal of 6/10-11/17.


First let’s put the Comey Affair into its set and setting. The current Pres., Donald Trump has caused the greatest political uproar since the election of Franklin Delano Roosevelt. Roosevelt too was hated and vilified by what he called the ‘economic royalists’ that now hate Trump; different faces but same class. Former Pres. Obama prior to the election stated that Donald Trump would never be president. Trump’s political adversary, Hillary Clinton, thought her election in the bag only to find that the triumph went to her rival.

The news was crushing for these people who considered themselves an elite appointed by God to do His work. Looking down on Trump’s base that they had given many derogative names such as the Deplorables, ignoramuses and whatever they now found themselves led by a man they despised personally who was the leader of this despicable mob of unwashed peasants, to use an antique term.

Their disappointed rage was so terrible that many government employees quit their jobs while there was a near universal refusal by the remaining to cooperate in any way with the new President. They put on their pussy hats and through a snit in the very streets.

Comey himself had a very questionable role in the election releasing potentially damaging information concerning Hillary Clinton. The timing was suspicious. Clinton was accused of much more damning activities than Trump is being accused of but that has been swept under the rug. She is a Liberal.

So, while investigations have been going on for months and months now with absolutely no show of conclusive evidence, or indeed, any evidence at all, Congress chose to call a hearing at which the star witness was the FBI head who had already come up with nothing hence had nothing to report and in fact reported nothing.

So, really, what we have here is a show trial after the Soviet fashion. Also what we have here are essentially fictional narratives meant to amuse and entertain.   Just before his appearance, Mr. Comey released publicly a seven page propaganda paper he titled: Statement For The Record: Senate Select Committee On Intelligence.

Mr. Comey opens his short story, for that’s what it is, with the words:


I was asked to testify today to describe to you of interactions with President-elect and President Trump on subjects that I understand are of interest to you. I have not included every detail from my conversations with the President, but to the best of my recollections I have tried to include information that may be relevant to the Committee.


Reading this one comes to the conclusion that this meeting has no other relevance than perhaps a discussion of the Pres.’ personal habits. Trumpian curiosities. In other words, the Committee is frivolous. Isn’t the real intent of the hearing to see if the Pres. is somehow criminally lacking. Comey is the man who is conducting this investigation to find Trump criminally liable for something, anything; the Committee doesn’t care what just so long as they can get rid of him. They think his election is a fluke and therefore doesn’t count.

And then Comey advises that he has carefully edited his testimony. To give his edits credibility, apparently knowing that one day he was to be called to testify something about the Pres. he ‘took notes.’ Apparently Comey’s conversation with the Pres. was so far beyond Comey’s experience, and he is a man who should have seen everything, that:


To ensure accuracy I began to type (the conversation) up on a laptop in an FBI vehicle outside Trump Tower the moment I walked out of the meeting.


Hmm. An FBI vehicle outside Trump Tower? Was Comey wired? Was the FBI vehicle a surveillance truck? Hmm. Does the FBI have tapes of this meeting. That might be illegal.

Sure, there are enough weasel words in those comments that mean Comey has effectively said nothing. He has determined what the Committee wants to hear and presumably selected the most juicy passages throwing the rest of the edits on the cutting room floor. I wonder if Mr. Comey has ever been to law school where he would learn to talk in circles?

Now, Mr. Comey works direct for Mr. Jeff Sessions, Trump’s personally selected Attorney General and Mr. Sessions reports directly to Pres. Trump. Whatever information that Mr. Comey uncovers should have been made aware to AG Sessions. Was it? And, if not, why not? Sessions in his turn should have reported to the Pres.

But Mr. Comey does not speak through his boss Sessions. No. He says instead:


The IC (Intelligence Community) thought it important for a variety of reasons, to alert the incoming President to the existence of this material, even though it was salacious and unverified.


I see, what we have is water cooler talk, a rumor jest and smirk. In fact, the story that Trump pissed on a prostitute in Moscow several years ago. One imagines the Committee members smiling inwardly at their recollection of the rumor.

As morally reprehensible as pissing on prostitutes may be, as a sexual perversion it is fairly common, even has a name: Golder Shower. And when it comes to minor sexual perversions, let the innocent stand up.

Wow, isn’t the country overjoyed by Trump’s exposure. (smirk, smirk, allusion intended.)

Now, perhaps I’m wrong but the FBI’s jurisdiction doesn’t extend to Russia. CIA maybe, but not the FBI. Yet, Mr. Comey was asked, not by AG Sessions but the Director of National Intelligence to deliver these remarks to the Pres. ‘because the material implicated the FBI’s counter-intelligence responsibilities. Oh.

And Mr. Comey said, holding up his right hand, this is the carefully edited selective truth, so help me God.

So, then, Peggy Noonan of the WSJ examines Mr. Comey’s selected and edited testimony. Now, remember, Comey is no callow youth. As Peggy describes him:


Whatever Mr. Comey’s reputation, and it’s mixed- an intelligent accomplished professional who is plenty slick; state-of-the-art Beltway operator with an image of integrity, yet trailed with suspicions of slight smarm- he’s a careful man.


Then Peg quotes Comey’s relation of the face to face meeting on January 27, 2017 a week into Trump’s term of office when it might be said he is feeling his way in his new surroundings. Already under extreme attack, rioting in the streets, hateful MSM media coverage, Trump knows it’s going to be a tough haul. Comey has had a questionable record prior to the election. Sitting on this side of the screen I had to ask myself what Comey was doing? What was his agenda? Which side was he on? His own?

Wouldn’t it be reasonable then for Trump to want to get a feel for where Comey was coming from? We have Comey’s version of what he’s seeing in Trump but we don’t have Trump’s idea of what he’s seeing in Comey’s behavior. The other side always gives balance. What Trump does already know is that the civil service is up in arms against him, rabid Democratic Senators and Congressmen are obstructing every move he makes, if he jaywalks the MSM reports it as a major crime. So is Comey working for him or against him?

The Pres. levels with Comey, according to Comey’s notes written down later when he has time to compose a narrative, the Pres. says: ‘I need loyalty, I expect loyalty.’ Right! Who doesn’t? Damn right, he doesn’t need a smiling back-stabber; which is Comey, he wants to know, staring at him intently to capture his reaction.

This man of the world, Comey, this state-of-the-art Beltway operator, is struck dumb by Trump’s desire to know if he is going to back stab him or not. Well, my God, Comey is speaking to Trump, the Liberals idea of the reincarnation of Adolf Hitler. Why wouldn’t Comey come to the conclusion that Trump was asking for a Hitlerian loyalty oath, hey? It doesn’t seem he was to me, but what was Comey’s reaction to the simple statement of fact. Why, Comey this Beltway operator was struck dumb. This so far exceeded anything Comey had seen or heard deep in the Swamp of DC: ‘I didn’t move, speak, or change my facial expression (No! He was a deer caught in the headlights) in any way during the awkward silence (getting a little purple here) that followed. We simply looked at each other in silence.’

Does anyone with experience and sense believe Comey’s reaction? I don’t. Trump didn’t ask for criminal collusion as Comey implies, he wanted to know if Comey was a back stabber. All Comey had to say was I do my job without fear or favor from anyone. I will deal with you with integrity. I will not be influenced by the hatred that I know surrounds you. I am not your man but I will protect your administration from any unlawful assaults. You will have no reason to find fault with me.’

Bingo! That’s it. What does Comey do, he says and I mean I do not believe him, that he froze in the headlights. Some Beltway operator.

Peggy runs through the right or wrong arguments through the rest of the article. Then gives away the farm. She says:


Then again, a conservative intellectual with small town roots wrote, during the testimony, that he thought this might be a break point, a moment when Trump’s supporters would listen close and think he’s not so much like them, and not so different from the swamp he means to drain. I myself don’t know.


Let me help you, Peg, didn’t you describe Comey as smarmy and slick at the beginning of your article? Didn’t you say he was a state-of-the-art Beltway operator? Do you not think us small town rubes saw that immediately? Trump is doing his best against terrific odds and that is clear to everyone but Trump’s enemies. No, we are not breaking, the deal hasn’t gone down, he may not survive the beatdown but he would still be a better man than all the people in the Swamp for all that.

First Thoughts On

M’sieu Macron And His Granny


R.E. Prindle


He stuck a feather in his cap and called it macaroni.


One of the most remarkable and laughable political performances of the century took place on the stage of France recently. It was almost unbelievable straight face stand up comedy.

This cute little guy who married his high school teacher twenty years older than himself has been elected by the French to represent them on the world stage in competition with big boys like Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin. He self admits that he has no culture and neither do the French although I know of some perverts who are deep into French Culture so tell it to them.

Now, this little guy, cute as hell, M’sieu Emmy MacRoni who as far I know isn’t installed in office yet, stood up on the world stage and threatened Russia with dire harm from France then, turning from the East to the West he threatened the US, although this time he did invoke the EU. Apparently he doesn’t know that the EU is a toothless tiger without an army.

He seems to be relying on the President’s vocal critics in the US as his support.

Even though his Granny was a teacher, she appears to have been a little light on geography. Let me school M’sieu MacRoni in modern geography: France is this tiny little country on the Western end of the European promontory; China at the Eastern end of Asia could incorporate France into its empire off into some obscure corner and never trip over it; India makes France look like an off shore island as it is also much larger while growing rapidly into an economic power. These two Asian giants together rule world commerce while China is still organizing.

China is in the process of laying down a superslab highway along the route of the old Silk Road with ancillary highways. This will tie together all of central Asia and with luck extend all the way to the French coast. China will make the Mongol invasion a reality.

The world laughs at M’sieu MacRoni’s posturing. He seems something of a bad farce to us.

The Russia that M’sieu MacRoni is threatening is incomparably richer than France; for instance, it has oil and gas reserves and France has none. Think heating oil. Tell you anything M’sieu MacRoni?

The US that M’sieu MacRoni is mocking has pulled France’s chestnuts out of the fire twice, 1914-18 and 1940-45. US money set France back on its feet after WWII. OK, let the dead past bury its dead. Emmy MacRoni, who has no culture, has forgotten it so why shouldn’t the US.

The fact remains that the US also dwarfs France and the US and Russia combined are so large that France barely shows up on maps. With a minimum of luck the US and Russia are going to combine. This will leave the EU between the jaws of the anvil. You know what that means. The Eastern States of the EU, Poland, Hungary, Austria, Switzerland are already secession minded so the old EU is toast. A new EU will be formed along rational lines.

So, really M’sieu MacRoni, keep your threats to yourself. Be meek and mild, like you are to Granny, before your betters and cooperate fully.

We still honor the French culture you despise and say doesn’t exist but unfortunately it is going to be swept away in the course of events so it is irrelevant whether it exists or not except as a historical relic.

Accept the role of France in the near future. France can be only a facilitator and not a leader. On stage you act like you’re still in school before your teacher. Those high school essays are cute but they have no place in the real world. It takes more than strut to exist on the world stage.

China, Hollywood And The ‘Correct’ Point Of View

China, Hollywood

And The ‘Correct’ Point Of View


R.E. Prindle


A very interesting story about China and Hollywood appeared in the Wall Street Journal of today (4/19/17). It confirms the continuing marginalization of the US and the threat to the survival of its Constitution.

It seems that Part 8 of Fast and Furious opened in China to 169 million compared to about 70 million in the US. (Inflated to 99 million in the reporting by including Canadian receipts, so China can now dwarf North America. (US, Canada, Mexico). Thus, implications go far beyond mere Box Office considerations. China has now surpassed the US in screens adding 25 a day, that is, 25 a day! Chinese admissions are half the US so the Fast and Furious receipts could be doubled to 338 million. China soon will have a bigger annual gross than North America with plenty of room to grow.

Anent political considerations the WSJ story makes two very revealing admissions:

Tensions between China and the White House have accelerated since the presidential election. Mr. Xi is seeking to strike a contrast with President Donald Trump as a champion of globalism, and he appears eager to advance China’s narrative- both by pressuring Hollywood studios to portray the nation favorably and in the long term, by adopting Western filmmaking techniques for China’s own industry.

So, what kind of favorable portrayal do the Chinese insist upon, which is actually a form of censorship, because they won’t show US movies that might be critical. For instance in a movie portraying the Trump, Xi, Kim Jong Un situation it would be necessary to show China as the moral and ‘correct’ champion with the US and Korea as squabbling brats. Hollywood will have to accept an inferior position for the US.

Here Mr. Xi should horrify US Liberals and have them condemn him and China as Neo-Nazis. Indeed, as Mr. Xi states:

We must make patriotism into the main melody of literature and art creation, guide the people to establish and hold correct views of history, views of the nation, views of the country, and views of culture, and strengthen their fortitude and resolve to be Chinese,” said Mr. Xi at the Beijing Forum on Literature and Art in October 2014.

So, there you have it, conditions no Liberal will tolerate in the US but are acceptable to them when imposed by China. In pleasing the Chinese to retain access to the Chinese market Hollywood does violence to everything the US professes to believe as guaranteed by our Constitution. In point of fact, as far as movies go Hollywood is now the tail and China is the dog. The Hollywood tail is not going to be able to wag the Chinese dog.

In fact Hollywood’s relationship to the market now becomes like that of France, Germany or Japan to the US market. i.e. foreign films. China within perhaps as little as a year or two may produce more movies than the entire West let alone Hollywood.

The mass market in the US has then disappeared. With the mass market gone the way is open for other cities than Hollywood to produce movies designed specifically for the US domestic market or US-European markets. In any event Chinese control of ‘correct history, culture and mores’ must not be allowed to control US filmmaking.

As Mr. Xi’s comment indicates his notion of globalism is simply Chinese domination of the globe. Foolish Americans if they allow that to happen.