Quote

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The website 23&Me ran a full page ad in the Wall Street Journal today. (6/20/17) titled Everyone Deserves A Place In The World.

The ad posits this possible fact:Over 65 million. That is the amount of people who have been forced from their homes worldwide. Continuing conflicts and political instability…continue to displace more and more people each day.

I’m sure the above is trueish. The implication is that someone, obviously in more stable areas, should take them in because,

…we still have a tendency to focus on differences when we talk about humanity

I’m not sure that the conclusion drawn from the premise follows. This is known as fuzzy thinking.

We see otherness when we should see kinship.

We see “them” not “us”.

But on a genetic level, human beings are 99.5% identical.

This is pure scientific fact.

I don’t know how pure that science is or even if it’s a fact, but I do know this: I can’t run as fast as Usain Bolt. Something tells me that there’s more than .5% difference between us.

The ad goes on to implicitly call for the more politically stable US and Europe to take in all 65 million. There is a basis to compare the facts of taking in just a few million to taking in 65 million. I’m not just talking the logistics.

Europe, Canada and the US have taken in several million Moslem displaced human beings who according to 23&Me are nearly exactly like us, but do they think the same. Only .5% difference but we are all 100% human beings.

Just a few million displaced persons have created constant turmoil in the once stable European countries of Sweden, Germany, England France and Italy. Our fellow human beings have colonized cities and large areas from which they exclude “us”. These areas are called no go zones for “us”.

Our fellow human beings (99.5% identical) have murdered innumerable “usses” in terrorist attacks, they have raped countless women and blamed the rape on them because they were inappropriately dressed. In other words they wore European clothes rather than Moslem clothes. That’s all it took to justify rape in Moslem minds. (99.5%) They have bullied thousands of men who are forbidden defend themselves lest they be jailed as Islamophobes.

Yes, 23&Me they share 99.5% DNA but are they 100% grateful human beings? Did I mention that among their crimes they coerced thousands of underage English girls into prostitution? Does that affect you at all?

Are there 65 million displaced persons in the world? Are you aware, 23%Me, that in a couple decades, by 2050, when the world population increases by a billion or so that there may be over 200 million or more displaced persons?

I don’t think your heart will be big enough to contain them.

Thanks for the lovely sentiments.

Everyone Deserves A Place In The World

How To Solve The Moslem Problem

How To Solve The Moslem Problem

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Europe and the US have no one to blame for their Moslem problem but themselves. They developed a social system like no other social system that had ever existed on the planet. Completely foreign to human psychology and then they expected the world to embrace it on first sight. As might be expected, other more traditional social systems being confronted by what they considered a monstrosity considered the Western system to be an existential threat. It had to be destroyed.

The most virulent of this opposition was aroused in the mind of the Moslem world. But what was the method to be to destroy the West? It was obvious that the pure military destructive power of the West could not be equaled by any effort of the Moslems. Since military warfare was out of the question they resorted to an asymmetrical warfare taking advantage of Western psychology that they had thoroughly analyzed.

The Moslems learned the rules of Western society and how to violate them with impunity. As I say the West has caused its own problem confident in their military superiority they bombed Moslem countries virtually into oblivion. This created vast numbers of displaced persons who migrated into the countries that had just destroyed theirs. These countries failed to see that they came as avengers intent still on destroying the Western social system and replacing it with theirs.

Once in place they began to put their asymmetrical methods into practice. Their warfare methods were treated as crimes no matter how horrendous they were. A perfect example is the bombing of the World Trade Center in the US, NYC. This sensationally successful operation cost them nothing other than 19 dead operators. Their explosives were two hijacked commercial airliners loaded with jet fuel which were flown into the towers. The result was not only that the two towers crashed to the ground but several ancillary buildings also, the total value was billions of dollars, three thousand dead civilians and the disruption of NYC for months while people as far away from NYC as Portland, Oregon feared an attack on its lone tower. The not very bright US president, George Bush, shut down the entire US for four days costing billions and fatally weakening the economic structure of the US. Bush’s further response was to spend trillions of dollars in a knee jerk reaction bombing the crap out of Iraq and Afghanistan. This ran the national debt deep into the trillions of dollars. Altogether this action that cost the Moslems nothing was perhaps the most successful military operation ever.

Not bad results for very little investment.

In addition the Western reaction was masochistic. They treated this horrendous act of war as a mere crime, rounded up some hapless Moslems who may or may not have had anything to do with the assault and put them on trial in a court of law. All the perpetrators died in the assault. If it was a mere crime this situation ended with their deaths. The Moslems must have thought: These guys are suckers! We can take them!

Then began a peaceful invasion of the West aided by Western politicians whose motives are still unclear. They’ve never been analyzed. Thus, now going on decades, Moslems have been committing every type of act of war with impunity while colonizing whole cities including London, Paris and NYC. In England, they recruited hundred’s perhaps thousands of young English girls to work as prostitutes, sanctioned by the government lest stopping it might be called, get this, racist. No kidding. Can’t you see the Moslems laughing their asses off around their hookah making obscene jokes.

They bombed the Boston Marathon injuring hundreds, the American masochistic response was: Don’t go off the deep end here. Not all Moslems are bad; these were terrorists. Well, OK, then what? The Moslems have been terrorizing Paris for a decade where dozens of cars are burned every night. If what I read is true, Saturday June 10, 2017 Moslems are going to begin a terror campaign of suicide bombers, armed assaults with AK 47s, bombings and whatever that will continue until Paris is destroyed. And France dithers.

In England the Moslems bomb a concert filled with children and all is forgiven. The West looks at a picture of a little Moslem child injured and goes off the deep end. But, masochistically accepts the bombing of English children? The Moslems get another big laugh.

Something must be done, the Moslems are about to conquer the West, but what? Military operations are out of the question, we would merely be destroying ourselves. OK. Why not take a page out of the Moslem book? What do the Moslems do when they conquer countries? What will they do when they conquer the West?

Quite simply, they will impose civil disabilities. Read your Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire by Edward Gibbon. I’m serious. Go out and get a copy now if you don’t have one.

As Gibbon tells it, when the Moslems conquer a country they impose civil disabilities on the non-Moslem population. Thus, even though the Moslems were a small part of the population they were able to control the much larger majority. Among the disabilities the natives were forbidden to ride horses being restricted to asses and donkeys. Those they had to ride facing backwards inculcating a feeling of inferiority and humiliation. There was an extra non-Moslem poll tax and other humiliations. Of course, one could escape these disabilities by converting to Moslemism. Thus, the non-Moslem majority was turned into a Moslem majority.

In today’s struggle the Moslem minority, while having more chutzpah than a whole tribe of Jews, is attempting to seize control of the narrative by ceaseless atrocities that the silly West continues to treat as crimes thinking, I presume, to solve the problem by removing the perps from the streets. Of course there is no bottom to the number of fanatics willing to be imprisoned or die.

The only possible solution to the problem that is viable is to impose onerous disabilities on the Moslems including a heavy poll tax. The option of renouncing Moslemism is available otherwise Moslems would have to endure the humiliation of civil disabilities or leave for Moslemland.

I’m sure that those who haven’t realized that the old democracy disappeared with the Twin Towers, as the Moslems intended, will object. They have to be overridden or we might as well turn Moslem now. There is simply no other viable option. Impose disabilities now. Sent the Imams back to Arabia and make the rest shave their beards.

This must be done if the West is to survive and done now. Let us hope President Trump has the courage to do the necessary.

Trump, Clinton And Deep Politics

Trump, Clinton And Deep Politics

by

R.E. Prindle

Much noise has been created about possible Russian involvement in the recent presidential election. Conflicting reports have the Russians favoring either now Pres. Trump or, on the other hand, Clinton. It has been considered especially reprehensible that Pres. Trump was ‘elected’ by the Russians. And if this defies common sense whatever influence Russia may have had it could not possibly equal the US media hate blitz unremittingly directed at Trump for well over a year leading up to the election. One wonders how Trump survived it. Yet this supposed invisible Russian influence overrode the US media hate fest.

However, in a situation nearly totally obscured by the US MSM both Trump and the Clintons were involved with the Jewish/Russian Mafiya. This is not to say they were willingly but as the Jewish mob was extremely powerful, especially in NYC, coercion was involved.

The Jewish Russian criminals arrived en masse on our shores after the downfall of the Soviet Union in the nineties. They came in the thousands destroying Brooklyn’s Brighton Beach suburb. Extortion was a key racket so it is probable that both Trump and the Clintons were forced to pay for protection.

I will deal with Pres. Trump in another article but first I wish to give an indication of the Clintons’ involvement. This is a quote from Robert I. Friedman’s book Red Mafiya: How The Russian Mob Has Invaded America. This Mafiya is always referred to as Russian but in fact they are all Jews from Russia. P. 267-68.

Grigor Loutchansky, a Latvian born convicted felon and president of the Austrian-based NORDEX, a multinational trading company, had been implicated in everything from major money laundering to smuggling nuclear components. House speaker Newt Gingrich once said the US government officials believed Loutchansky had shipped Scud missile warheads to Iraq from North Korea. The ubiquitous Loutchansky was also a former business associate of both Chernomyrden and Semion Mogelevitch, according to CIA and other Western intelligence officials. Yet somehow this enormously wealthy underworld rogue was invited to a private Democratic National Fund-raising dinner for Clinton in 1993. During coffee, Clinton turned to the mobster to ask a favor: would he pass along to the Ukrainian government requesting it to reduce its nuclear stockpile? Clinton then posed for a photograph with the grinning hood, which Loutchansky later liberally passed out among his cronies, greatly enhancing his stature among corrupt government officials and the criminal underworld. When the photo of the men shaking hands was eventually published in a Russian newspaper, the CIA analyzed it to see if it was fake. When they discovered it was genuine, agency officials were aghast. “Loutchansky had one thing in mind: legitimization,” a congressional investigator probing Russian organized crime explained. “He wanted US citizenship and he wanted to buy a US bank.”

This criminal Mafiya organization that as Friedman explains had seriously corrupted US society and politics has been almost completely ignored by the MSM. The Clintons were involved as early as 1993 and judging from contributions to their charity fund it has continued until today. According to Friedman the US CIA and FBI were well aware of the Jewish mob and yet did little about it. One imagines that this Mafiya’s influence on US politics was much more effective than any of the Russian government.

China, Hollywood And The ‘Correct’ Point Of View

China, Hollywood

And The ‘Correct’ Point Of View

by

R.E. Prindle

 

A very interesting story about China and Hollywood appeared in the Wall Street Journal of today (4/19/17). It confirms the continuing marginalization of the US and the threat to the survival of its Constitution.

It seems that Part 8 of Fast and Furious opened in China to 169 million compared to about 70 million in the US. (Inflated to 99 million in the reporting by including Canadian receipts, so China can now dwarf North America. (US, Canada, Mexico). Thus, implications go far beyond mere Box Office considerations. China has now surpassed the US in screens adding 25 a day, that is, 25 a day! Chinese admissions are half the US so the Fast and Furious receipts could be doubled to 338 million. China soon will have a bigger annual gross than North America with plenty of room to grow.

Anent political considerations the WSJ story makes two very revealing admissions:

Tensions between China and the White House have accelerated since the presidential election. Mr. Xi is seeking to strike a contrast with President Donald Trump as a champion of globalism, and he appears eager to advance China’s narrative- both by pressuring Hollywood studios to portray the nation favorably and in the long term, by adopting Western filmmaking techniques for China’s own industry.

So, what kind of favorable portrayal do the Chinese insist upon, which is actually a form of censorship, because they won’t show US movies that might be critical. For instance in a movie portraying the Trump, Xi, Kim Jong Un situation it would be necessary to show China as the moral and ‘correct’ champion with the US and Korea as squabbling brats. Hollywood will have to accept an inferior position for the US.

Here Mr. Xi should horrify US Liberals and have them condemn him and China as Neo-Nazis. Indeed, as Mr. Xi states:

We must make patriotism into the main melody of literature and art creation, guide the people to establish and hold correct views of history, views of the nation, views of the country, and views of culture, and strengthen their fortitude and resolve to be Chinese,” said Mr. Xi at the Beijing Forum on Literature and Art in October 2014.

So, there you have it, conditions no Liberal will tolerate in the US but are acceptable to them when imposed by China. In pleasing the Chinese to retain access to the Chinese market Hollywood does violence to everything the US professes to believe as guaranteed by our Constitution. In point of fact, as far as movies go Hollywood is now the tail and China is the dog. The Hollywood tail is not going to be able to wag the Chinese dog.

In fact Hollywood’s relationship to the market now becomes like that of France, Germany or Japan to the US market. i.e. foreign films. China within perhaps as little as a year or two may produce more movies than the entire West let alone Hollywood.

The mass market in the US has then disappeared. With the mass market gone the way is open for other cities than Hollywood to produce movies designed specifically for the US domestic market or US-European markets. In any event Chinese control of ‘correct history, culture and mores’ must not be allowed to control US filmmaking.

As Mr. Xi’s comment indicates his notion of globalism is simply Chinese domination of the globe. Foolish Americans if they allow that to happen.

Trump’s New Era: Look Out There’s A Monster Coming

 

 

Trump’s New Era:

Look Out, There’s A Monster Coming

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The election is over. It has Taken President-elect Trump but little time to signal that his coming is a New Era. The hot house incestuous Left took even less time to throw a hissy fit, rioting in the streets while physically abusing Trump voters as they shouted about how democratic they are.

The media reacted to the Trump peril in their typical way bemoaning the fact that the Left’s era was over, at least temporarily. After distorting Trump’s proposed policies to nonsense pre-election the media isn’t now prepared to deal with the fact that Trump is actually putting those policies into effect now.

The ever obtuse editor of the Wall Street Journal, Bret Stephens, either pretends not to understand or is too thick to understand what Trump means by putting US interests first. Mr. Stephens asked what I presume is the rhetorical question: [WSJ 11/11/16] “What real American, after all, wouldn’t put “American first” in his political priorities?”   Mr. Stephens is apparently ignorant that our outgoing president, Barack Obama, put every country’s interests before the US. Not being overly familiar with US history Mr. Stephens is also unaware that Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who one might describe as a ‘real American’, put British and Jewish interests first before ours by driving us into the most destructive war in the history of the world. Obviously you don’t have to be a ‘Domestic Terrorist’ knuckledragger to subordinate US interests to others, you can be a ‘real American.’

Therefore Mr. Stephens is hysterically vocal in his opposition to Trump’s appointment as counsel of Stephen Bannon. Mr. Stephens snidely says quote: “Mr. Bannon also says his “America first” which- see if you can spot the difference- either is or isn’t “America First.”

In my opinion there is no difference, small f or capital F. The idea is that we not look to others’ interests in preference to our own as Obama and FDR did. A crime in Mr. Stephens’ eyes. Mr. Stephens apparently applauds that China and Mexico are being made rich at the expense of the US working stiff.

As incestuous as the Left is Mr. Stephens then not so closely associates one he detests with one he hates. He says:

As my colleague Bari Weiss pointed out in a recent article in Tablet, the foremost figure in today’s alt-right, Richard Spencer, dreams of “a new society, an ethno-state that would be a gathering point for all Europeans. It would be a new society based on very different ideals than, say, the Declaration of Independence.” [Mr. Stephens gives no indication of where he obtained the quote. Sloppy journalism WSJ.]

Mr. Spencer’s vision may not be Mr. Bannon’s. But the new found political power of the latter will inevitably open channels for the former.

That’s an interesting quote. For those not aware Tablet Ezine is a rabid anti-Trump orthodox Jewish site that promotes the ethno-State of Israel that has very different ideals than, say, The Declaration of Independence. So Mr. Stephens isn’t against ethno-States in principle he merely opposes a European ethno-State. Such bigotry on the page of the WSJ!!!!

He ends his quote with the paranoid fear that Mr. Bannon is ‘inevitably opening channels’ for a European ethno-State. G-d forbid. Watch out! There’s an anti-Semite coming. Or even more fearsome creatures, the Godzilla of them all:

In “The Second Coming” Yeats asked, “What rough beast, its hour come round at last, slouches toward Bethlehem to be born?” The answer may yet turn out to be the likes of Steve Bannon and his ugly little litter of neo-nationalists.

Look again Mr. Stephens, re-read Poe’s The System Of Dr. Tarr And Professor Fether. Those aren’t monsters coming Mr. Stephens, those are the asylum keepers escaped to put the hot house loonies back in their bins. Worse luck still, hey?

The Constitution Vs. Foreign Invasion

 

 

The Constitution Vs. Foreign Invasion

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Wonder of all wonders. The Trump presidency may be the first in history to do what it promised. Kris Kobach of the administration is reported by the hostile press to suggest that the Trump administration may require Moslems to register with the government as foreign agents.

Naturally the Liberals are agog that such a thing could happen rushing precipitously to the Constitution which they believe requires the protection of enemy operatives within US borders. My supposition is that they don’t read well while having the weakest intellectual faculties. Why do they suppose that any government, Constitution or no, must allow enemy paramilitaries to operate freely in its territory?

One expects nothing from Liberals, and gets it, but this attitude boggles the imagination. On what grounds are we to tolerate the bombing of a marathon race, the murder of fifty people at a nightclub or the shooting up of a Christmas party?

On what grounds are we to dismiss the ranting of a Moslem ‘scholar’ who says that the Moslems are going to take over the country and impose the jizya tax on Christians and if they won’t pay it, fight them? In Moslem terminology you can read ‘Christian’ for non-Moslem.

Thank god we have a President who isn’t going to sit idly by or encourage this to happen while Liberals dither over whether it is Constitutional to allow invaders to occupy the country.

It seems only yesterday that these same Liberals were screaming that the Constitution was antiquated and should have no force.

First and Second Amendments? What First and Second Amendments? They shrilled.

Obama may have been a Moslem who wished for a Moslem State with Sharia law but the US has ejected him and his acolyte Clinton. It’s a New Day, a New Hope and Change that We can believe in. Send the Moslems packing.

You Can’t Always Get What You Want

 

 

You Can’t Always Get What You Want,

(But if you try sometimes, you might

Find what you need.)

by

A Crude Sort Of Nationalist

 

Oh, yes. The results of the election took the Left by surprise. It didn’t take the Right by surprise. I knew from day one that Trump would win and never wavered. Back then around day one when the race began I was what Obama, taking the high road, called a ‘Domestic Terrorist’. Just today I learned that according to High Road Barry I’m ‘a crude sort of Nationalist.’ Keep an eye on me, I like the attention. Personally, I’m not so sure I’m one or the other. In my vanity I would consider myself a clear sighted globalist. But then, what do I know.

When I say globalist I don’t mean in the narrow, constricted, constipated sense that High Road uses; I mean in the expansive way that realizes that it doesn’t mean surrendering the country to fatuous trade organizations; I mean it in the sense that low cost producers are corrected from taking advantage of- I almost said exploiting- more advanced economies with higher wage and benefit structures. Note that word benefits. The low cost producers don’t provide their workers with any, a terrific advantage. Those benefits are what make it so easy for citizens of low cost or no cost countries to migrate to where the bennies are.

So, like Trump, I believe in tariffs that balance out the production costs. Probably what the High Road means by being a crude sort of Nationalist. Well, if High Road is actually leaving I say God Speed at exit levels and have a nice journey and take your wife with you. God, I’m tired of the sorority gal image. I liked her better in the pictures of the high life girl visiting Spain. Those jungle prints were revealing. Then she came back to the US and got into her sorority drag again. Queen of the hop. Boppity bop be bop.

Which brings us to that other vile defamation going around- misogynist. God, what a negative sexist term. What does it mean in the mouths of Liberals- a man who won’t bow and scrape before the eternal feminine? Talk about being afraid of ‘strong’ women, those crazy feminists are afraid of strong men. Masculinity is at a premium these days and why? I don’t apologize for it. Walk like a man my son. Trump beats that femmy High Road and somehow he managed to snare a snappy wife, then another and then yet another. That man knows women. Obama? Well, there are those persistent rumors.

Then our friend over at the Wall Street Journal, Peg Noonan, is all a-tremble at the Trump triumph. She apparently thinks something startling is going to happen; it isn’t. Oh, there will be a shift in attitude, that will be beneficial, a slight move to the Right, but after being a New York Liberal for seventy years I don’t expect anything major from Trump, no 8.1 on the Richter scale.

I hope that Trump honors his Chinese and immigration stances but we will have to see. He’s already said the sexist crap is settled law so the tranny population should sky rocket; our kindergartners will continue to be trained to perverted sexual practices. That ought to solve the late term abortion problem. No conception, no problem.

I could easily go on a ramble, but I’m going to call it here. If High Road is really going to check out I’d like to give him a heartfelt so long, it’s been good to know you.   Let me recommend a good parallel universe.

But then, I remember he categorically said that Donald Trump will never serve as President of the United States. What’s the trick?

Red Star Over Hollywood

 

 

Red Star Over Hollywood

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Ye Editor of the WSJ blunders along in his (or her) 10/18/16 article entitled Red Stars Over Hollywood celebrating the Chinese cultural invasion of Hollywood buying up studios and theatre chains. Ye Editor opines ‘Chinese investment in US movies isn’t a security threat.’ Ye Editor is stone cold wrong. It is a security threat among others.

What is cheerily called Globalism is actually an asymmetrical cultural war for Global cultural supremacy. That is if you’re not too starry eyed to see it. Two of the most significant Communist texts are the Frenchman Montesquieu’s The Spirit Of The Laws and the American Graham Sumner’s Folkways, a study of mores. It is through the base of laws and mores that one subverts another culture. The Communists (Red Star is code for Communism) have known the importance of these two studies from the beginning and laws and mores are key elements in their strategy.

With the success of Freudianism and the rise of TV/movies the equivalent of cultural atom bombs their effectiveness is manifold. The Jews have successfully used the media to mold American mores and their lesson has apparently not been lost on the Chinese.

Ye Editor apparently realizes this as he says: The movie business is a competitive market with none of the immediate security risks of defense contractors or power-plant operators. The key word here is immediate. Correct, not immediate but long term. The corrosion of mores and laws is like rust; it is visible but you can’t see it working but it does 24/7/365. Ye Editor seems to accept the consequences of Chinese media control while totally opposing any resistance to it. We don’t know how much the Chinese are paying him.

He says: Chinese censors tightly control access to this market [in China] allowing in only 34 films a year, so Hollywood studios compete to curry favor by dumping Chinese for North Korean villains…including Chinese product placement…and having China save the day. Ye Editor apparently doesn’t realize these concessions are anti-American propaganda. He says: No authoritarian regime has ever had as much power to broadcast its narrative (not to mention the abominable Nazis) and silence or buying off its critics, (Ye Editor?) including the US and other open societies.

We have cognitive disconnect here. While seemingly admitting that Chinese propaganda is operating in the US, an attack on mores, he says: Americans (that is Deplorables, knuckle draggers and other reprobates) bothered by a filmmaker’s approach to China can take their entertainment dollars elsewhere and fund independent projects…. Well, up yours too, Ye Editor.

How disingenuous can the Journal and Ye Editor be? First, he, she, it, puts the entertainment industry in censorious Chinese hands including the power to distribute films then he says it is possible to buck the censoriness of the Chinese mores and work on independent projects. With no hope of distribution one adds.

Americans are not even able to buck censorious Liberal control over the media. The entire movie/TV/press opposition to Trump’s candidacy is such that he is reviled nonstop and this includes the ‘conservative’ Wall Street Journal.

So, in essence Ye Editor endorses and applauds the takeover by the Chinese of American culture and mores.

As no resistance has been permitted to Western Communist takeover of US laws and mores there is little reason to believe that there will be any resistance to Eastern Communisms’ efforts either. Americans either don’t know or they don’t care. They’ll take whatever comes along so long as it’s Red.

Let us hope Trump triumphs in November as I’m sure he will. It is necessary and I think inevitable. Let us hope, ‘the common man’ can live up to his reputation for wisdom and think straight.

 

Vote Trump.

The Plot Against America: Character Assassination And Politics

 

 

The Plot Against America:

Character Assassination And Politics

by

R.E. Prindle

 

More dangerous is that a Trump administration would give respectability and power to the gutter voices of American politics.

–Bret Stephens

They meet in secret. Men of immense wealth; a woman of limitless ambition. Their passports are American but their loyalties are not. Through their control of international banks and the media they manipulate public opinion and finance political deceit. Their aim is nothing else than the annihilation of American political independence, and they will stop at nothing- including rigging a presidential election- to achieve it.

Joseph McCarthy, c. 1950,

as quoted by Bret Stephens.

 

Mr. Stephens in his WSJ article of 9/18/16 titled The Plot Against America. Sneaking up on the reader the McCarthy quote above was presented as Mr. Stephens own words. Mr. Stephens says: Astute readers will note the quotation of a speech, there was no indication that it was a quote, delivered…by Joe McCarthy. I suppose there are astute readers who immediately recognized the quote. I wasn’t one of them. One does note, however, how timely Gunner Joe’s speech is in relation to today. The ‘conspiracy’ rolls merrily along. Why is it a conspiracy and not just politics. It is open for all to see. Google The Committee For Public Relations. Subscribe to their magazine: Foreign Affairs. Read H.G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy. There isn’t any hidden conspiracy here, it is a political program.

Mr. Stephens links the ‘gutter politics’ of McCarthy to the ‘gutter politics’ of Donald Trump, ‘Donald Trump alights on the Compleat Conspiracy [he says]. Anti-Semites are thrilled.’ Oh, we see, the Fuehrer has returned. Dum de dum dum. As improbable as it may sound Trump is accused of starting the ovens up for a replay of the ‘never again’ holocaust. Ah, if only Hitler and Trump had been strangled in their cradles the 40s and today’s replay wouldn’t be possible.

Forget McCarthy’s conspiracy, Mr. Stephens as apparent spokesperson for the Jews has concocted his own immense conspiracy.

Pat Buchanan would be its intellectual godfather, Ann Coulter and Ms. Ingraham its high priestesses, Breitbart and the rest of the alt-right web its public trumpets. American Jews shouldn’t have to live the 1930s in order to figure out that the ‘globalist cabal’ might mean them.

Ah so, number one son, I see, even though not of the alt-right or part of any conspiracy, large or small, I must be one of Trumps’ Trumpeteers. In short, Mr. Stephens calls me the equivalent of a bastard. I am unqualified to be a citizen of this Liberal ‘Democracy’ of his. Obama’s vaunted inclusiveness excludes half the population of the United States.

But Mr. Stephens is calling us all ‘anti-Semites.’ This alone means that the polls favoring Hillary Clinton must be frauds or they wouldn’t be wheeling out the heavy artillery of dreaded ‘anti-Semitism.’ So the election is expected to turn on how well we love our Jews who have done so much to selflessly make our lives mo’ bettah.

Mr. Stephens apparently believes with Mad Hillary that we are in fact Deplorables. Mr. Stephens has titled his piece after the title of Philip Roth’s novel of the same name. The Plot Against America. See how neatly he turned around responsibility. His group isn’t plotting. Who are the plotters? Why, the American people who can’t be trusted to see straight and do the right thing. Whatever happened to the infallible Common Man?

Mr. Stephens lays out the horror he and his side daily live with:

(Mr. Roth) imagines what might have been for America if Lindbergh had defeated Franklin Roosevelt for the presidency in 1940, signed neutrality acts with Germany and Japan and initiated a reeducation campaign for recalcitrant American Jews. The novel draws its power from being a too-plausible alternative reality, from which we were spared less by the wisdom of the public than the vagaries of history.

Ah, you see, we the stupid public couldn’t be trusted but blind luck saved us.

I have studied this period and rather than finding Mr. Roth’s fantasies all too plausible alternate history only one of many equally or more plausible scenarios.

The bete noir of the Jews, Charles Lindbergh, was not a bad person, he was not a crypto-Nazi, and he was not an anti-Semite. When he said that Roosevelt, the British and the Jews were inveigling the country into a war that was of no concern to the US he but spoke the truth. Would matters have been any worse in a cold war with Germany and Hitler than a cold war with Stalin and the Soviet Union? Not that I can see.

And what were the Jews themselves doing at this critical time? The Jews had been at open war with Germany since the Communist Revolution in Russia. The Jews declared actual war on Germany in 1933 with the active collaboration of the Roosevelt Administration. It has been conclusively proven that the English, Jews and FDR worked to get the US into the war as early as 1938 and from my researches from 1933 on. Even the then dean of American historians, Charles Beard wrote a tome demonstrating it was so which cost him his reputation, career and place in American letters. Character assassination with a vengeance.

What then else did the Jews do? A stooge named Theodore Kaufmann, a neighbor of Roth in Newark, composed a short book titled Germany Must Die. That is the Jews were plotting the genocide of the Germans before the Germans conceived the so-called holocaust. In his book he calculated that if all the German males were castrated Germany would die out in a generation. The book was enthusiastically received in the US, abhorred in Germany, sold fantastically especially after a glowing review in Time Magazine and several influential newspapers. The notion lodged in FDR’s brain. Late in the war he was heard muttering that castration might be the final solution.

While Kaufmann gloated and FDR agonized, the whole of the American right was imprisoned (that is put in concentration camps) while awaiting their fate in kangaroo courts.

While Roth’s fantasy is less than probable there are many many other scenarios that could be written. I thought that since 9/11 we were beyond all that but here we have Mr. Stephens and the Wall Street Journal pulling these old chestnuts out of the fire to use again. Trite, trite canards.

To quote Mr. Welch, made famous by McCarthy: At long last, Gentlemen, have you no self-respect?

Vote Trump.

An Incident In The Semitic Struggle For Supremacy

An Incident In

The Semitic Struggle For Supremacy

by

R.E. Prindle

 

A matter of importance occurred this Monday (10/2/16).

 

The first Monday of October is set for opening the new Supreme Court session. This year there was a conflict between Semitic Jewish law and that of US law. October 2 coincided with the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah. This posed a problem for the three (3) Jewish members of the US, that is United States, Supreme Court: Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan.

Although sworn to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States which means giving precedence to US laws and customs the three traitors chose to give precedence to Jewish Semitic law. Just as Moslem Semitic Sharia law has been rejected so should now we reject Jewish Semitic law.

The Trashy Trio should be removed from the Court now as they are unable and unwilling to fulfill the oath they swore upon voluntarily accepting, even lusting for, the appointment.

If Obama refuses to act responsibly by demanding the resignation of the Jewish trash then Trump when he is elected will have to act more responsibly than Obama or his acolyte Clinton are capable of.

The 21st Century Jewish War is on.