The Plot Against America: Character Assassination And Politics

 

 

The Plot Against America:

Character Assassination And Politics

by

R.E. Prindle

 

More dangerous is that a Trump administration would give respectability and power to the gutter voices of American politics.

–Bret Stephens

They meet in secret. Men of immense wealth; a woman of limitless ambition. Their passports are American but their loyalties are not. Through their control of international banks and the media they manipulate public opinion and finance political deceit. Their aim is nothing else than the annihilation of American political independence, and they will stop at nothing- including rigging a presidential election- to achieve it.

Joseph McCarthy, c. 1950,

as quoted by Bret Stephens.

 

Mr. Stephens in his WSJ article of 9/18/16 titled The Plot Against America. Sneaking up on the reader the McCarthy quote above was presented as Mr. Stephens own words. Mr. Stephens says: Astute readers will note the quotation of a speech, there was no indication that it was a quote, delivered…by Joe McCarthy. I suppose there are astute readers who immediately recognized the quote. I wasn’t one of them. One does note, however, how timely Gunner Joe’s speech is in relation to today. The ‘conspiracy’ rolls merrily along. Why is it a conspiracy and not just politics. It is open for all to see. Google The Committee For Public Relations. Subscribe to their magazine: Foreign Affairs. Read H.G. Wells, The Open Conspiracy. There isn’t any hidden conspiracy here, it is a political program.

Mr. Stephens links the ‘gutter politics’ of McCarthy to the ‘gutter politics’ of Donald Trump, ‘Donald Trump alights on the Compleat Conspiracy [he says]. Anti-Semites are thrilled.’ Oh, we see, the Fuehrer has returned. Dum de dum dum. As improbable as it may sound Trump is accused of starting the ovens up for a replay of the ‘never again’ holocaust. Ah, if only Hitler and Trump had been strangled in their cradles the 40s and today’s replay wouldn’t be possible.

Forget McCarthy’s conspiracy, Mr. Stephens as apparent spokesperson for the Jews has concocted his own immense conspiracy.

Pat Buchanan would be its intellectual godfather, Ann Coulter and Ms. Ingraham its high priestesses, Breitbart and the rest of the alt-right web its public trumpets. American Jews shouldn’t have to live the 1930s in order to figure out that the ‘globalist cabal’ might mean them.

Ah so, number one son, I see, even though not of the alt-right or part of any conspiracy, large or small, I must be one of Trumps’ Trumpeteers. In short, Mr. Stephens calls me the equivalent of a bastard. I am unqualified to be a citizen of this Liberal ‘Democracy’ of his. Obama’s vaunted inclusiveness excludes half the population of the United States.

But Mr. Stephens is calling us all ‘anti-Semites.’ This alone means that the polls favoring Hillary Clinton must be frauds or they wouldn’t be wheeling out the heavy artillery of dreaded ‘anti-Semitism.’ So the election is expected to turn on how well we love our Jews who have done so much to selflessly make our lives mo’ bettah.

Mr. Stephens apparently believes with Mad Hillary that we are in fact Deplorables. Mr. Stephens has titled his piece after the title of Philip Roth’s novel of the same name. The Plot Against America. See how neatly he turned around responsibility. His group isn’t plotting. Who are the plotters? Why, the American people who can’t be trusted to see straight and do the right thing. Whatever happened to the infallible Common Man?

Mr. Stephens lays out the horror he and his side daily live with:

(Mr. Roth) imagines what might have been for America if Lindbergh had defeated Franklin Roosevelt for the presidency in 1940, signed neutrality acts with Germany and Japan and initiated a reeducation campaign for recalcitrant American Jews. The novel draws its power from being a too-plausible alternative reality, from which we were spared less by the wisdom of the public than the vagaries of history.

Ah, you see, we the stupid public couldn’t be trusted but blind luck saved us.

I have studied this period and rather than finding Mr. Roth’s fantasies all too plausible alternate history only one of many equally or more plausible scenarios.

The bete noir of the Jews, Charles Lindbergh, was not a bad person, he was not a crypto-Nazi, and he was not an anti-Semite. When he said that Roosevelt, the British and the Jews were inveigling the country into a war that was of no concern to the US he but spoke the truth. Would matters have been any worse in a cold war with Germany and Hitler than a cold war with Stalin and the Soviet Union? Not that I can see.

And what were the Jews themselves doing at this critical time? The Jews had been at open war with Germany since the Communist Revolution in Russia. The Jews declared actual war on Germany in 1933 with the active collaboration of the Roosevelt Administration. It has been conclusively proven that the English, Jews and FDR worked to get the US into the war as early as 1938 and from my researches from 1933 on. Even the then dean of American historians, Charles Beard wrote a tome demonstrating it was so which cost him his reputation, career and place in American letters. Character assassination with a vengeance.

What then else did the Jews do? A stooge named Theodore Kaufmann, a neighbor of Roth in Newark, composed a short book titled Germany Must Die. That is the Jews were plotting the genocide of the Germans before the Germans conceived the so-called holocaust. In his book he calculated that if all the German males were castrated Germany would die out in a generation. The book was enthusiastically received in the US, abhorred in Germany, sold fantastically especially after a glowing review in Time Magazine and several influential newspapers. The notion lodged in FDR’s brain. Late in the war he was heard muttering that castration might be the final solution.

While Kaufmann gloated and FDR agonized, the whole of the American right was imprisoned (that is put in concentration camps) while awaiting their fate in kangaroo courts.

While Roth’s fantasy is less than probable there are many many other scenarios that could be written. I thought that since 9/11 we were beyond all that but here we have Mr. Stephens and the Wall Street Journal pulling these old chestnuts out of the fire to use again. Trite, trite canards.

To quote Mr. Welch, made famous by McCarthy: At long last, Gentlemen, have you no self-respect?

Vote Trump.

Advertisements

An Incident In The Semitic Struggle For Supremacy

An Incident In

The Semitic Struggle For Supremacy

by

R.E. Prindle

 

A matter of importance occurred this Monday (10/2/16).

 

The first Monday of October is set for opening the new Supreme Court session. This year there was a conflict between Semitic Jewish law and that of US law. October 2 coincided with the Jewish holiday of Rosh Hashanah. This posed a problem for the three (3) Jewish members of the US, that is United States, Supreme Court: Ginsburg, Breyer and Kagan.

Although sworn to uphold the laws and Constitution of the United States which means giving precedence to US laws and customs the three traitors chose to give precedence to Jewish Semitic law. Just as Moslem Semitic Sharia law has been rejected so should now we reject Jewish Semitic law.

The Trashy Trio should be removed from the Court now as they are unable and unwilling to fulfill the oath they swore upon voluntarily accepting, even lusting for, the appointment.

If Obama refuses to act responsibly by demanding the resignation of the Jewish trash then Trump when he is elected will have to act more responsibly than Obama or his acolyte Clinton are capable of.

The 21st Century Jewish War is on.

Listen To Donald Trump; Your Lives Depend On It

 

 

Listen To Donald Trump: Your Life Depends On It

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Since Trump began being briefed for the presidency, no matter how badly, the tenor of his speeches has changed dramatically. Perhaps the FBI has disclosed their private information on the machinations of Obama that they were unable to disclose under Obama’s thumb.

When Trump now announced that Obama has strategically placed one hundred thousand Mexican paramilitaries (Trump doesn’t use this term) he, Trump, says that he will as his first move arrest the whole lot. My impression is that this accusation is very, very serious. As Trump says, you, we, are not bigots, we are good people and as such have every right to protect our lives, our loved ones lives and our children’s lives.

You may be sure that many Moslem communities as well have been strategically placed so that on the signal all will rise as one. Knowing the danger of predicting the event it is in all likelihood very close, perhaps on the eve of the election or alternatively the eve of Trump’s inauguration. Remember that Obama has categorically said that Trump will not be president; take him at his word.

It behooves you to listen to what Trump is saying; he is telling you something, as much as he dares.

Despite what you may have been led to believe Trump is an honest candidate. He cares for the United States and its survival. Put your prejudice behind you, discard all the slander of the MSM, Hillary and the administration. You have been taken. Put your support behind Trump now. He is putting his life on the line for you and for our country. Make no mistake the next four three months will be the most critical the country has ever experienced.

Evil times await you if you don’t support Trump. The abyss yawns.

The Birth Of Two Nations

 

 

The Birth Of Two Nations

by

R.E. Prindle

 

In 1915 D.W. Griffith and Thomas Dixon Jr. released what is perhaps the most famous movie, silent or talkie, ever made. The movie that depicts the aftermath of the Civil War, that is Reconstruction, was the biggest spectacle ever produced to that time, and also the highest grosser.

The movie was addressed to the North. For the North the Civil War was a war of extermination intended to kill all the White Southerners. That they didn’t succeed is a mere accident of history. For instance, read War Crimes Against Southern Civilians by Walter Brian Cisco. After a hundred and fifty years later Southerners finally feel free to tell the truth. The book will help you understand Griffith’s Birth of a Nation.

Thus the nation Griffith and Dixon referred to was the unity of the Aryan Nation. The Birth was its hoped for reunification after the horrors of the Civil War. The plea was never to kill each other again; especially avoiding the genocidal horrors of Generals William Tecumseh Sherman and Phil Sheridan among many other Northern commanders.

Naturally the movie was seen as racial and racist and a great hue and cry was raised by Negroes and Jews but not by the men who fought the war either North or South. While the movie in many cases was viewed by participants and survivors of that great conflict, and thought to accurately represent the situation a barrage of defamation was directed at D.W. Griffith, the director, and Thomas Dixon, the writer.

Dixon who was a best selling author of talent and a good story teller was gradually turned into a racist monster having no place in American literature or culture. Both he and Griffith’s careers began a precipitous decline following the movie and both died penniless and in obscurity.

Now, a hundred years later in an effort to co-opt history a new film also titled Birth of a Nation has been written, directed and acted by Nate Parker. Nate is a Negro. His film deals with a slave uprising led by Nat Turner in Southhampton County, Virginia in 1831. The rebellion was a murderous, bloody, rapefest that ended as it must have once the surprise was over and the Whites organized. But, what is meant by Nate Parker’s filming the movie? Is it merely to mock Griffith and Dixon or is he calling for a unification of the present Negroes to exterminate present Whites?   In other words, a serious call for the birth of a Negro United States or Nation? The film certainly excites the Negro people to do battle with the White Demons. And that at a time when the Negroes are already working themselves into a lather finding excuses to kill, burn and loot.

The very people who denounce Griffith and Dixon now applaud Parker as the auteur of a fantastic picture. They little know that they are the projected victims of the film.

However Nate Parker has complicated the matter by having been tried for raping a White girl in college, sort of following Griffith and Dixon’s script that was denounced as defamatory.   The White girl is described as being unconscious, thus one imagines drugged, hence unable to give consent as Parker claims while having gratified his hatred of Whites on the girl’s body. Having gratified his hatred Parker invited his Black roommate into the room to have some too. So we have a gang rape.

So the Griffith film in which a Negro gratifies his lust on a White girl seems to have been reenacted by Parker even though the scene in Griffith’s film was called inaccurate and racist.

Parker, of course, represenst his rape of the girl as a mere youthful indiscretion and he’s put all that behind him; convenient for him although his victim subsequently committed suicide at the age of thirty. Collateral damage.   So let’s forget about the mistake and concentrate on Parker’s movie that calls for lots more murder and rape.

Let’s try to place Parker and his movie into a historical continuum. The Nat Turner uprising occurred in South Hampton County, Virginia in 1831 as noted. The uprising was not too far distant in time from the 1804 revolt of Toussaint L’Ouverture in Haiti which established the independence of Haiti from the French. Haiti was a major event in the consciousness of nineteenth century history. While Toussaint did not in any sense defeat Napoleon as some historians claim he did defeat troops of the Empire. The reaction among Whites was stupendous. Some feared an uprising in the US like that of Nat Turner other lauded Toussaint as the greatest military figure of all time surpassing Washington, Napoleon, Caesar and whoever. Just the greatest and that because he was a Negro. Matthew Clavin in his fine book Toussaint L’Ouverture and the American Civil War details the reaction to Toussaint’s victory. All the White men were massacred while the White women were given the choice of a horrible death or marriage to Negroes, but a real marriage not a mockery of one. Most women chose to submit to the Negroes.

The Whites not murdered during the Haitian Revolution fled to the nascent United States. While France had sold Louisiana to the US in 1803 New Orleans was still considered a French colony to which many of the slave owners repaired bringing their slaves with them. Many of the slave owners were mulattoes and Negroes thus New Orleans had a large corps of Negro slave owners at the time of the Civil War.

Others landed along the Gulf Coast so news of Haiti was general in the South among both slave owners and slaves. This Haitian rebellion then both incited Nat Turner and terrified the Whites. So, the result was murder, theft and rapine what it would seem Nate Parker is inciting with his movie. As far as rape goes he knows what he’s talking about.

Efforts are being made to prevent the theater release in October, not only by Whites but by Negroes also. This would seem wise. In the event of a Negro uprising that could occur before election time or at least inauguration that might seem to justify martial law and the continuation of Obama rule. Some worry about this and their worries may be justified. We’ll see. I fear that the US is now two nations and not one.

Vote Trump anyway.

Hillary Clinton: Mad Mama Merkel’s Disciple

 

 

Hillary Clinton

Our Mad Mama Merkel

By

R.E. Prindle

 

The real bone of contention is this election is whether we will have an influx of a million Middle Eastern Moslems or not. The democrats define their opponents as unfeeling bigots, knuckle dragging morons who flunked out at kindergarten for refusing to allow such a disintegrating element into this country. There are many reasons to reject immigration of any kind none of which refers to religion and/or ethnicity but they do not concern us here.

The important thing here is that as the Moslems fifteen hundred years of history show they always come as conquerors. They mean to change the nature of any country they enter exclusively to their own religion, law, mores and customs. They are Judaism perfected. This is not open to question.

Clinton and the Dems are willing to accept the consequences that they most clearly recognize. Trump and his Party prefer the existing Western Culture of the US hence rejection of Moslem immigration.

There is no difference between the Moslem invasion of the US than the English invasion of post-Columbian North America.

In the English settlements in Virginia the Indian tribes on more than one occasion wiped them out. Was that an act of xenophobia or an act self-preservation? Unfortunately for the Indians English reserves were large and they kept coming. The consequence was that the Indians were wiped out.

In the Massachusetts colony the Wampanoags might easily have destroyed the English invaders but chose to aid them. Whether ‘xenophobes’ pushed to exterminate the invaders or not the consequence of their benevolence was the same as in Virginia. The Indians were overwhelmed.

Hillary, who must have misplaced any brain God gave her, refuses to learn from history so rather than refuse entry she sends planes to the Middle East to fly them here. Inevitable result? A repetition of the Indians with the English.

Do we have to look far to verify the consequences? No. Only across the Pond to the Germany of Mad Mama Merkel. Mama… the derogatory term the Moslems give to that silly woman.

Mad Mama has not only let in but kicked down the doors and waved the Moslems on. The result? Endless and increasing acts of violence, murder, and rape. Wholesale rapes in one day of thousands of German women in the city of Cologne. Mad Mama obviously hates her own sex or she is brutally letting the Moslems fuck them. Maybe Mad Mama is sexually repressed.

Does Hillary think the same won’t happen in the US. Of course not, she hopes it will. She’s going to encourage it just like Mad Mama. It is part of the Liberal ideology. Sarkozy of France wanted to pass a law requiring French women to fuck Africans. It was the only way to break down racial barriers for the amalgamation of races he said. Mad Mama belongs to the same ideology but rather than pass a law requiring German girls to fuck Moslems she gives Moslems carte blanche to rape them.

Is this Hillary’s plan for the US? She comes from the same ideological group as Mad Mama and Sarkozy so what else can be the plan?

So if you vote for the evil witch Hillary, disciple of Mad Mama Merkel, you are voting for the rape of American womanhood. May you suffer the consequences personally if you do.

 

Vote Trump

Rating Hardships Among Immigrants

 

 

Rating Hardships Among Immigrants

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Hey, Everybody, listen! The US is a country of immigrants; we’re all immigrants, r-i-i-ight? Righto! OK!. So I think it’s time to rate which immigrants had the toughest time of it all. My conclusion may surprise all you innocents.

I was moved to make this investigation into hardships by an article in the 7/2-4/16 Wall Street Journal by one Warren Kozak. He entitles his tale of immigrant woe: Fleeing the Czars, Defying Gravity: A Fourth of July Immigrant Tale.

He begins his epic:

On July 4, 1900, Samuel Hoffman and his father, Moshe walked across the gangplank of a ferryboat that unceremoniously dumped them, along with a large group of fellow immigrants, at a dock on 14th St. in Manhattan. Independence Day for these newcomers meant liberation from Czarist Russia.

Wow! That’s a tough immigrant story. However, Kozak points out his ancestors exited a primitive society of black bread and gravy dipped potatoes to what may have been the most advanced country on earth and possibly the whole universe. Indeed, within just a few years son Samuel had become a multi-millionaire manufacturer while still speaking broken English. So, you know, from black bread to caviar in much less than a generation.

That’s a great story and warms the cockles. It is true that these immigrants were ‘unceremoniously dumped’ out on the streets rather than being welcomed with a brass band. That must have hurt their feelings and while they didn’t speak English they did speak Yiddish and while the US was nominally English speaking, NYC itself was nearly Yiddish speaking. Indeed Yiddish newspapers were plentiful if out two immigrants were literate as they appear to have been. So communication with their fellows was as easy as it had been in the old country.

Let us compare them with another group of immigrants who were themselves escaping from a repressive war torn Europe rife with religious persecution. While our two Jews who were leaving a primitive Russia for what seemed to them, according to author Kozak another advanced planet our group were leaving a superior civilization for a bleak undeveloped land with no amenities to be faced by murderous hostile inhabitants, no more than immigrants themselves, right? Who were hell bent on their genocide and succeeding a few times before these poor impoverished immigrants who had to wade ashore could establish themselves.

They didn’t become multi-millionaires overnight as it were, oh, no, they began decades of hard backbreaking work while fighting off the bigoted so-called natives. Natives? Hah! Immigrants like the rest of us.

Yes, we’re talking about Jamestown Virginia immigrants back in the brutally primitive eighteenth century. These dirt poor suffering immigrants knew what it meant to face bigoted natives who not only denied them entrance into the country club but murdered them.

Now disparaged as ‘Old Dead White Men’ by a new wave of bigots they paved the way, so to speak, for the easy arrival of later immigrants who were living in electrically wired mansions within a few years.

So, this Independence Day, 2016, let’s doff our Make America Great Again caps to those ‘Dead White Men…and Women’ who made this country great in the first place. Boom boom, it’s Independence Day!

Vote Trump.

Who Benefits If Western Whites War On Eastern Whites?

 

 

Who Benefits If Western Whites

War On Eastern Whites?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

There seems to be a growing threat of violence between the NATO nations and the Russians. Should such a war be forced between these two White sides who benefits?

Consider! A couple decades ago the Negro Kamau Kambon on public television announced that genocide should be committed on Whites. At the same time the Jew Noel Ignatiev then a full professor at prestigious Harvard University was touring US campuses delivering his sermon that Whiteness had to be eliminated from the planet.   This was with the full approbation of Harvard, he was never disciplined. Ignatiev did this with the full concurrence of the Jewish establishment. No Jewish voice was raised condemning him. He was cheered wildly by campus audiences so they were apparently comfortable with their own extinction.

So, both Negroes and Jews want to see White people wiped from the planet. All White people. Genocide.

Consider again that many reputable scholars believe that the Jews began WWI and WWII in which Whites fought Whites with terrible carnage if not to extinction. Thus if the Jews can foment another war of Whites vs. Whites it will be to extinction.

Since WWII Jews have been advocates of mass immigration to the US and Europe of colored and Moslem populations. In the event of war not only would Whites be fighting Whites but Negroes and Moslems who have successfully invaded Europe and taken over in the US would be enemies within.

In the US Jews, Negroes, Moslems and Mexicans or Hispanics if you prefer would be internal enemies in the US. Mexicans are already in revolt. Who is President of the US? The Negro Barack Obama who invariably favors his own Negroes and who are his apparent coreligionists the Moslems.

The Jews and Negroes are seconded by a large body of White Liberal Quislings in both the US and Europe.

So, let us ask ourselves why is the Negro Obama driving us toward war and who will benefit by such a war? Neither the US or Europe are enemies of the Russians or they us. Russia does not want war yet Obama is provoking the Russians to war as hard as possible.

Consider! Obama has said that presidential candidate Donald Trump will never be president. This is reputed to be a democracy so how could Obama prevent a duly elected Trump from being president. What does he mean when he says Trump will never be president? Only by violence, only by a coup in which he seizes the government permanently and prevents Trump from taking office.

We have been forewarned. The Jews and Negroes want to see us dead. They have the means to do so. They have the will. They are acting now.

I am reasonably certain that Trump will be elected. What then will he do? What will we do if Obama refuses to step down?

Well, arrest him.

Vote Trump or vote for your own extinction. Those are your two choices. Do the right thing, Vote Trump.

Kamau Kambon, Harriet Tubman And Whiteness

 

 

Kamau Kambon, Harriet Tubman And Whiteness

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The war against Whites and Whiteness goes on. While the placement of an inconsequential Negro ex-slave, Harriet Tubman, on the twenty dollar bill shoving Andrew Jackson into the trashbin of history may seem of little moment the intent is more significant than the deed.

While the uproar of a few years back caused by the Jew Noel Ignatiev and the Negro Kamau Kambon has receded or perhaps has been memory holed their legacy comes nearer fruition step by step. Speaking for his Jews Ignatiev intoned that Whiteness must disappear from the earth while for his Negroes Kambon merely wanted Whites exterminated.

Both come closer. Remember that hetero-White men have been marginalized, made inconsequential by the Jewish Hate Law that makes him the only ‘unprotected’ racial and sexual group in the US. In other words, he has been placed outside the law.

That key piece of legislation having been achieved, the erasure of the White past goes on. Sports teams from basketball to football are now nearly all Black and Brown while fewer and fewer White players are even considered for the leagues. Based on the ridiculous proposition that the White 67% of the population is incapable of playing while a mere 14% of the population is so capable they provide 60 to 90% of team personnel.   Did I hear the word: prejudice?

On the Supreme Court if Obama is successful seven out of nine judges will be non-White or female while no White Protestant is deemed worthy of inclusion. Four would be Jewish and one Black while five are Catholic. Any other appointee should Obama appoint him would doubtless be a woman or non-White, but not a White Protestant.

As the non-White percentage grows street names, statues, and public buildings will increasingly obliterate the memory of Whites. This is inevitable. Historically when one group replaces another they appropriate religious shrines and public honors.

One may expect a continuing distortion of history taught in schools as White contributions are minimized and the deeds or whatever of non-entities like Harriet Tubman are emphasized.

The process as you can see is actually well advanced. The team of the Jewish Jack Lew and Negro Barack Obama are rapidly pushing it forward. Even something so obvious is either going unnoticed or applauded by limp wristed Whites. Indeed, Quisling collaborators.

Both the Republican and Democratic establishments apparently unable to recognize the disappearance of their influence assist in their demise. They are even trying to kill the candidacy of Donald Trump who appears to threaten their lassitude.

The placement of Harriet Tubman on the twenty is significant. It is a sign of the continuing displacement of the White majority that should be in its prime.

Welcome to the New Stone Age.

A Touch Of Madness At The Wall Street Journal

 

 

A Touch Of Madness At The Wall Street Journal

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Ye Editor at the Wall Street Journal is at it again. He is dangerously out of touch with the psychology and temper of the country. He titles his 2/22/16 editorial America’s Moment Of Trump. He might as well have cynically titled it A Touch Of Trump In The Night, hoping Trump will just go away. Let me tell him: It is Trump or nothing.

Trump is the Republican Party. Boy Rubio is merely the alternative Democratic candidate. The Insiders backing him are either crypto- or pseudo-Democrats. Boy Rubio is unelectable. Should the Insiders sidetrack Trump which they seem intent on doing Trump voters will not vote for Boy Rubio. Therefore the election will go to either Clinton or the Bolshevic. If it goes to the Bolshevic look to a reenactment of the Bolshevic revolution of Russia.

Trump is the only electable ‘Republican.’ You may sure that 30% of Democrats will vote for him. This is not a Party issue. Get behind him.

I don’t believe he will be defeated by throwing hundreds of millions of dollars at Boy Rubio but combined with foul dirty tricks and rigged elections that is a possibility.

In point of fact with the shift of full support to Boy Rubio Cruz is a piece of badly burnt toast. He no longer has a chance. His best bet would be to negotiate the best deal he can with Trump, perhaps the vice-presidency, and withdraw from the race throwing his support and any delegates to Trump.

Insiders have made it apparent how much they despise Trump both personally and politically. The refuse to admit that they have fatally bungled their policies in both the US and Europe. Those policies have been rejected by sentient Americans.

It is their intent to submerge the majority population of the US in a sea of color thus murdering the current majority population.

Whatever ideological or sociological motives they have for this criminal genocide are as contemptible as they are themselves. This goes for Ye Editor and his staff at the WSJ also.

Beware! Remember Nuremberg. You balk the will of the majority of voters at your own risk. You have preached democracy as an ideal, fought bloody expensive wars to impose your ‘democracy’ on people who don’t want it yet you deny that democracy to the very people of America who are trying to practice it.

Beware! Beware! Beware!   Remember the Amalekites.

Analyzing The Holocausts

 

 

Analyzing The Holocausts- European And Jewish

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Jews have appropriated the ancient word Holocaust to a specific Jewish use but it would appear that the Jewish holocaust of WWII was a minor happening within the much larger, huge, European Holocaust that grew out of the Judaeo-Communist manifestation of the nineteenth century.

Currently the Jews call attention to art works ‘stolen’ from them by the Nazis that individual Jews want ‘returned.’ When all unrestituted thefts within the overall European Holocaust are considered Jewish complaints diminish to the vanishing point.

When the Jewish led revolution of 1917 took place the entire Russian country was looted from top to bottom. Anything of value was ‘appropriated’ as the Judaeo-Communists express it. The entire aristocracy had everything of value taken. Warehouses bulged with fur coats, art works, books, jewelry and anything of value. Kitchen utensils for Christ’s sake.

The Jews murdered the Czar and the Czarina as well as their innocent poor little tiny babies and children, stealing whatever the Romanovs had acquired over three centuries. Now, this is the key, the Russian Orthodox churches were stripped of everything of value while the churches were burned and destroyed wholesale. At the same time anti-Semitism was made punishable by law while synagogues were protected. There was no war on religion per se; there was a war on Christianity while Judaism was protected.

The gulag system was created while millions of Russians suspected of breathing while alive were murdered outright or destroyed in the gulag system.

The monsters Lenin and Trotsky attempted to foment revolution throughout Europe to replicate what was happening in Russia. They succeeded temporarily in Hungary murdering tens of thousands there while appropriating what they could. Multiple revolutions were attempted and put down in Germany. The Communist assault on German institutions created the National Socialist reaction. The Nazis were a mere reflection of Judaeo-Communism not an original political system.

Let us consider for a moment what would have happened if the Judaeo-Communists had triumphed. All of Europe would ultimately have been overrun. Apart from the tens of millions of nationalist Germans, French, Italians, Spanish and whoever that would have been murdered outright or boarded into cattle cars headed to the Siberian gulag, a looting of Europe would have taken place that would have made the colossal looting or Russia miniscule and anything the Jews lost negligible.

Consider the Roman Catholic Church with its vast treasures that the Jews coveted. The Jews had been praying for the destruction of the Catholic Church for two millennia. Imagine the glee when the Jews appropriated all that wealth, trampling all those crosses. Imagine the villas and castles, the Vatican, that the Jews would have appropriated.   Imagine the Jews jumping joyously up and down on the Pope’s bed, wearing his slippers shouting, You kiss mine and I’ll kiss yours. Perhaps the destruction would have equaled the Jewish-Allied bombing of Europe during WWII or exceeded it.

Having accomplished the Russian looting no claims of the Russians expropriated of their belongings have ever been returned or even considered while the Jews are now claiming previous ownership of what are now multi-million dollar works of art. The transfer of wealth goes on- expropriate and then claim.

Can you even possibly begin to fathom the hypocrisy of this people. Enough, shelve your guilt and call Stop to this idiocy.