Michael Douglas Cries Halt To Anti-Semitism

Michael Douglas Cries Halt To Anti-Semitism


R.E. Prindle


An Offended Michael Douglas

An Offended Michael Douglas

The above article in Tablet Ezine by Stephanie Butnick refers to a piece printed in the op-ed columns of the LA Times.  Miss Butnick’s article begins with an interesting quote from the Times piece.

While some Jews believe that not having a Jewish mother makes me not Jewish, I have learned the hard way that those who hate do not make such fine distinctions.

Perhaps not but Jewish hates do hence the scorn Michael Douglas receives for trying to ‘pass.’

Actually I’m more Jewish than MD.  My grandmother on my mother’s side was born Jewish make me technically a Jew.  However insofar as churching goes I was raised Congregationalist, Presbyterian and Methodist with just a tincture of Catholicism.    However since all religions come from a primitive form of consciousness I choose to live a more rational live abjuring all religions.  I pity you primitives and that’s not hate, that’s condescension.

The crux of MD’s story is that he and son Dylan were in a European spa, restaurant, whatever at which his son was dangling a Magen David prominently.  Somebody made a comment.   We don’t know whether he was European, Asian, African or what but I suspect a Moslem of some stripe.  Well, OK, but Michael says this represents ‘a rising tide of anti-Semitism in Europe.’  Thus unjustly and wrongly portraying Europeans as anti-Semites while that ‘hate’ speech most likely came from one of MD’s fellow Semites.  A small point perhaps but just let’s set the record straight.  It wasn’t a European.  None of the shooters of late has been a native of a European country.  To imply otherwise, Michael, might be considered ‘hate’ speech from you.  Watch your mouth and your pen.  You know what happened to John Galliano and James Watson.  You might never work again.

To revert to Michael’s son’s Magen David worn so conspicuously.  Let us say Dylan was inviting comment.  And like all such symbols as the Magen David you’re going to get it.  It’s just that way.  If Adolf Hitler were with you wearing a Magen David, Michael, I’m sure he would have received some ‘hate’ speech and you know he wasn’t Jewish.

Just as an experiment may I suggest that you get a big cross and dangle it to your navel and see what happens.  You’ll learn what hate speech means and it won’t be because someone thinks you’re Jewish even though some other Jews think you’re not.

Better yet, if you’re feeling really brave, hang a swastika over your bullet proof vest and watch gentle Jews savagely attack you.  Just cry out:  Wait, wait. I’m a pseudo-Jew and see if that stops them.

For a little light hearted fun put a Confederate flag in your lapel and stroll through Harlem.  You might find that amusing.

Or even put a medium sized US flag in that same lapel and see what comment that provokes.  I guarantee you’re going to hear something offensive.

So, really, Michael, if Dylan invites abuse you can’t be astonished if he gets it.  All those old symbols are barbaric and comments should be made.  Use your head.  It’s not because you’re Jewish it’s because you haven’t a clue.

PS:  If you want to comment it’ll cost you two dollars.

The Rising Crisis Of Judaism


The Rising Crisis Of Judaism


R.E. Prindle


The battle of Charlie Hebdo in Paris points up the rising crisis of Judaism.  The world appears to be tiring of Jewish antics once again.  The Jewish view of themselves as saints is coming more prominently in conflict with the Other’s view of them as devils.

While Jews term the latter viewpoint anti-Semitism the fact is that it is a reaction to Jewish activities.  First the Jews encourage the immigration of Moslems and Africans into France then as their known antagonism  to Judaism flex their muscles in a place where Jews are a small minority to them harass and kill them the Jews complain of rising anti-Semitism in France as though the French were responsible.

There is no French anti-Semitism, the French government might be said to be Jewish controlled while it has passed several laws imposing civil disabilities on the French people in favor of Jews.  To mutter a complaint about Jews in a corner is enough to put a true blue Frenchman or woman in jail.  Not even Bridget Bardot is safe, been fined several times for mentioning facts.  The rising anti-Semitism comes from their own Semitic culture- Moslem branch.

It can be no coincidence that Charlie Hebdo was disproportionately represented on its staff; nor is there anything to amaze about an African Moslem taking over a Jewish grocery killing several Jews as well as sacrificing a few French cops.  The French cops usually get overlooked in the reportage.  Both Charlie Hebdo and the Jewish grocery are acts of war, not crimes.  The Jews attack the Moslems in Palestine where they are the majority, the Moslems attack the Jews in France where they have the numbers.  After decades of war in Palestine the war is now spreading into Europe.  Where is the surprise?

Well, the surprise is the European reaction toward the Jews following the battle.  In a farce where the ‘68ers’ heading European governments revived their youth with but another march, this time demonstrating solidarity with the Moslems, including them in their photo-op, arms linked in a human chain while advising Israeli premier Netanyahu to stay home and cool his heels.  A major shunning.  To add insult to injury on Netanyahu’s projected March visit to the US, Islamist president Barack Obama has told the Israeli PM that he doesn’t have time to visit with him.  No eye ball to eye ball this time.

Just as Netanyahu displayed that famous Jewish chutzpah by crashing the Paris party perhaps he could grab his clubs and shoulder into one of Obama’s golf foursomes.  No time indeed.

While one cannot draw firm conclusions about these incidents they would have been impossible at any time from 1948 to the present.  Gosharoonies, Sandy,  is it time for the Jews to reevaluate their tactics?

Is it too much to think that they might have to get real?

Are No Go Zones A Myth?



Are No Go Zones A Myth?


R.E. Prindle


Can anyone believe there are no go zones?  What’s so impossible to believe?  No go areas have existed for decades in the US and probably thousands of years  throughout the world.

When I grew up in Saginaw, Michigan the First Ward, a Negro enclave, was definitely a no go area.  If you did go you were looking for trouble and trouble was not far behind.

Watts in LA was always a no go zone as I learned in the Navy.  When I lived in Oakland the Negro enclave of West Oakland was serious business.  I skirted it one time and was lucky to get by alive.  Harlem, the South Side of Chicago, there’s places even Negroes don’t go and they definitely don’t come out of their apartments at night.  And then there were rough areas in every town that you had no business being unless of course you’re one too.

I made the mistake of getting off the bus in East St. Louis once.  A big guy grabbed me outside the station and told me he didn’t want to see my White ass in town after dark, then he pushed me into the gutter.  Less than friendly I thought.

I crossed the street to stick my thumb out attracting the attention of three young lads who took their knives out in preparation for carving me up.  I was saved by an observant White driver who, very luckily for me, was passing through town on his way to Louisville.  One chance in a million.  Do I believe there are no go zones?  Just ask me.

Anyone who’s been following the news over the last few years knows there are banlieux around Paris where firemen can’t work without police protection; a lone policeman is not safe.  Park your car there and watch it go up in flames.

I like a good time.  I’ll give you a hundred dollars to walk through West Oakland- after you come out- with pictures.

Anyone who thinks there aren’t no go areas should leave their lily white enclaves once in a while and see how the other half lives.  For all I know they might be the perverted kind that enjoys getting beat up.

I’m not bigoted either but I’m not stupid.

The Great Religious War Of The Twenty-First Century


The Great Religious War

Of The Twenty-First Century


R.E. Prindle


The Moslem conquest of the world in the modern era has been simmering for some time.  Lothrop Stoddard sounded the alarm in 1922.  Of course the Moslem religion as propounded by the prophet Mohammed was posited as a universal religion to be imposed by force.  Worldwide conquest began immediately with armies sweeping into central Asia and India through the Iranian corridor, against the armies of the Byzantines, across North Africa and into Europe via the Iberian Peninsula.  As is well known the Moslem forces were checked at Tours in France by Charles The Hammer.

The Europeans then rallied and the reconquest of southern France and Spain began.  After conquest of the Byzantines at the end of the fifteenth century the pressure then ran through the Balkans, Southern Russia and to the Gates of Vienna.  The Moslems were driven back to their European enclave of the former Byzantine capitol of Constantinople, renamed Istanbul.  The Moslem ethic was then apparently exhausted as they became quiescent and stultified.

Awakened by WWI but hopelessly overmatched by the West militarily they began to develop techniques of asymmetrical warfare.  Having both psyched out the West and installed massive colonies through peaceful infiltration and/or traitorous assistance of Western governments they are now in a position to attempt the seizure of control.

They have over the last decade or two or three succeeding in imposing civil disabilities on the native European population through the legislation of traitorous European governments.  European legislatures have made it a criminal offense for natives to criticize Moslems or offer resistance to insults or even murder.  Under protection of the law Moslems have in essence enslaved thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of young girls and women.  This enslavement is characterized as ‘grooming’.  The term is apparently meant to be less offensive than the criminal and illegal and accurate term enslavement.

This ‘grooming’ has been with the consent of the national governments.  Men have been sent to prison for calling attention to the practice.  It is therefore impossible not to believe these governments are manned by secret or crypto Moslems as traitors to their electorates and country.  These government officials should be arrested and removed from office as traitors immediately.  This includes every existing European and American government.

Just as native populations have been under a regime of civil disabilities that have disenfranchised them in their own countries a severe regime of civil disabilities must be imposed on Moslems until they either return to their own countries leaving all possessions and assets behind or renounce this evil religion and expiate their crimes.  They cannot  remain Moslems and stay in the West.

Even China is driving them out.  This must be done in the West immediately.  Do not hesitate.

Moslem/Jewish Danger Signals From France


Moslem/Jewish Danger Signals


R.E. Prindle


Symi Rom-Rymer writing on the Jewish Sisterhood site linked above in an article superciliously titled Don’t Write Off France Yet make this comment:

When news broke about the hostages being held in the kosher supermarket in Paris, I began to hear rumblings on social media about rampant French anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic acts perpetrated by French Muslims.  At one point on Friday, I overheard a conversation between two women at a synagogue in Washington DC, in which Holocaust comparisons were frequently invoked.  In yet another response to the attacks, an American Rabbi likened Jews to the canary in the proverbial coal mine.

France [that is the French ‘community’] has long struggled with integration of its minority communities- Jewish and Muslim alike.  The French government’s inability to handle tensions over international politics like the Middle East conflict and the disintegration of social cohesion at home has only furthered simmering resentments.

Such muddled thinking as Miss Rom-Rymers’ almost defies analysis.  Her American rabbi’s comment about Jews being the canary in a coal mine seems most apt and even prescient.  Canaries, of course, were taken into the coal mines  because they were early victims to accumulating poisonous gases.  When the canary keeled over it was time to get out.

Indeed inter-community tensions may be near the breaking point and not only in France.  The fantasy the ruling sect of the West entertains that many cultures can maintain distinct identities while living side by side is rapidly being disproved, although god knows there are legions of us who understood in advance of the immigration, including every Moslem alive and I suspect also the Jews who instigated the tension in the first place.  As usual the Jews have cast themselves as the wise old heads and in this case the French as muddlers who just can’t get it right.

The writing about the Charlie Hebdo incident the article refers to seems to want to maintain that multi-culturalism in the West is a success except for rising anti-Semitism in the French community and anti-Semitic acts by the Moslem community, that is, the occasional 9/11 or Charlie Hebdo.

Thus, even though these tensions are actual wars going on in France, that is, on the one hand between Moslems and Jews and on the other Moslems and French, with Moslems being the aggressor in each case.  Miss Rom-Rymer places the fault for the tensions on French men and women because of their failure to integrate the warring parties.  She doesn’t give any indication of how this might be done however.

One must assume that the failure to make Jews and Moslems lie down together is completely one sided.  Even though neither Moslems nor Jews wish to give their identities up, seeking to impose those on French people.   I suppose that means that the French are stubbornly holding onto their trashy French identity.

Apparently Miss Rom-Rymer and her Jewish brethren fail to comprehend that only one identity can survive over time.  In fact the most stubborn, or perhaps fanatical, participant will survive and that one will be transmuted by the others in the process.  Thus when the Moslems stormed into Iran they imposed civil disabilities on the Iranians so that in the long run it was easier to become Moslem and equal rather than Iranian and groaning under onerous civil disabilities.

However, as the Moslems did so they created an Iranian strain of Moslemism called Shia while the Arabs became Sunnis.  The Iranians while converted religiously remained unconquered waging Shiite wars with the Sunnis from then to the present.

So, the disintegrating social cohesion, if there ever was any cohesion, in France is because the French government refuses to accept the consequences of allowing millions  of intolerant historically retarded Moslems into the country without imposing severe civil disabilities on them thus  requiring them to rethink their position among Western mores.  At this stage it looks as though France will be as Moslem as Iran in fifty years and with their own brand of Euro-Moslemism.  And just as hostile toward the Sunni and Shiite retards as the Shiites are now of the Sunnis.

The crisis in Judaism is mounting fast.  Truly as the rabbi says, the Jews are the canary in the coal mine.  It is time for them too to rethink their position vis-à-vis both the West and the Moslems.  They are a stone in the shoe making everyone uncomfortable.  They may have to choose conversion or be removed.  Both Moslems and the West have little care for them.  There are enough other irritants than to tolerate them.

Miss Rom-Rymer might take a few moments to contemplate the conversation she overheard between the two women in the DC synagogue.

Melanin Will Rule



Melanin Will Rule


R.E. Prindle


Let’s review the historical situation of the Aryan race. At one time the Aryans or Whites occupied a territory in Central Asia.  About the year -2000 they began to move.  They went East into China, South into India, West into Europe and Southwest into the Middle East.

In all cases except Europe that was but thinly occupied they were in a minority position, in other words, swamped by melanin rich or swarthy peoples. Even though they bedeviled the Chinese, through numbers the Chinese absorbed them over time so that no remnant survives.  The same is true of the Jewish colonies 1500 years or so later.

Among the Dravidian population of India, a black people, the Aryans put up a fight establishing a caste system forbidding Whites to mix with the blacks. Once again superior numbers triumphed and Whites as Whites have been absorbed into a darker population although Aryan traces survive in physical makeup while Aryan religion forms a major part of Hinduism.

In the Middle East in which the movement appears to have been later than China and India the Aryans were culturally submerged although having established themselves in Europe as the majority people. About -300 the Greek peoples moved eastward conquering the Middle East injecting a fresh infusion of Aryan genes so that the Middle East physically demonstrates Aryan traits although culturally the Aryans have been submerged in Semitism of one sort or another.

In Europe where little or no melanin existed the Aryans prospered and multiplied creating the first Aryan civilization outside the Central Asian homeland, since disappeared.

Expanding rapidly they took their revenge on the melanin peoples conquering the world but except in North America and Australia lacking the population to dispossess the inhabitants. Thus Aryans would have had undisputed possession of Europe and North America except for the fact that Negro Africans were brought to the US.  The conquest of Africa itself opened the doors for a peaceful invasion of Europe by Africans at the present time.

In population terms the Negroes have prospered more mightily than the Aryans.

In all situations melanin will destroy Whiteness. While the Negroes were swamped by European immigration to the US in the nineteenth century they were still able to maintain at least a minimal percentage of 10% against 20% pre-nineteenth century.  Yes, at one time one in five of the population was Negro.

Today with the assistance of Negro overlords Negroes comprise 25 to 30% of the White population. As high as one in three.  At the same time the remainder of the population comprising 15 to 20% is Asian or Western Indian, that is Mexicans and South Americans.

As the Negroes increase as a percentage of the White population they will soon reach one in two or 50% of the Whites.

The ultimate fate of Whites in America and Europe then is to be absorbed into the black, brown or yellow peoples. The die has been cast; there is little chance of any change in circumstances other than further increases in blacks, browns and yellows.

Who knows, but all things being equal within twenty years the number of unmixed Whites will be very small.

Henry Ford, Aaron Sapiro And The Food Corner



Henry Ford, Aaron Sapiro  And The Food Corner


R. E. Prindle

While cruising the internet in the past little while I have come across stories that claim the food supply is in process of becoming a tool of social engineering. The idea at first glance seemed as preposterous as the Nazi extermination camps when we first heard of them.

But then in my examination of Henry Ford’s so-called war on the Jews (Google R.E. Prindle Henry Ford) and researching Aaron Sapiro’s suit against Henry I came across a Sapiro reference to his guru David Lubin. It would appear that Lubin in Europe and Sapiro in the US were aiming for a world wide corner in wheat. It was their intent to hold the wheat crop off the market until they got the price they wanted.

From there it seemed a short step to favoritism in parceling out the supplies. And then my mind drifted to the Monsanto plan of engineering a wheat grain that would sprout only once and then become sterile thus necessitating the grower to buy a new supply of seed every year. The grower is then at the mercy of Monsanto.

Thus wheat has actually become a tool of political control, from there to flour and from flour to baked goods. A small step then to requiring chits to buy your bread. No compliance, no chits. Eventually control extending to all food stuffs and complete domination of the populace.

It would seem then that Ford clearly perceived the direction the Jews of his time were leading us. Is it any wonder they wanted to destroy him? Already at the time the Jewish criminals were in control of NYC’s bread supply so that every loaf of bread sold contributed a cent or two into Jewish coffers.

It would seem that a certain alertness is necessary on our part at this time. Keep you powder dry. Flour power that is. Ha, ha.


Which Side Are You On?

Which Side Are You On?

Decide Now


R.E. Prindle

There is no question that we have a global economic and political situation. There is also no question but that with globalism the so-called nation state is a thing of the past in fact if not in lingering aftereffects. The Global world then is divided by race, or species as the knowledgeable say, and ideology. You are Red or White, and I use the term in the political context and not the racial.

Therefore loyalty is to your side and not to any administrative unit. For instance the Negro species and the Red ideology is currently administrating the US unit. As a White and an Aryan I owe no allegiance to the Red Negro administrator Barry Obama as the leader of the Negroes and Reds. It appears that Putin is heading we Whites and Aryans. Therefore I am aligned with Putin as a White and an Aryan.

Barry who for some reason, perhaps at the instance of the Jews who considers the Russians as neo-Amalekites set for extermination root and branch, I say, Barry has decided to sanction Russia. This is absurd. He is asking Exxon to repudiate their contractual obligations in Russia in support or his idiotic sanctions. Barry is living in the past or is evil.

The idea of sanctions against Russia is insane in a global economy in which Exxon is in competition with China, India, Europe and others for their share of the oil and perhaps a bit more if they are to maintain their global status as a major player. To cooperate with the Red Negro is to jeopardize their very existence. Exxon, I presume, is a White company staffed primarily by Aryans. It therefore behooves Exxon to align themselves with Putin as leader of the Whites and Aryans. They must maintain their preeminence.

If this causes conflict with the Reds and Negroes as led by Barryo and his Boyos then it is necessary for Putin and Exxon to face him down. Apply sanctions against the US.

If it is true that China will become the world’s largest economy by the end of this year, then the US and Russia both become secondary powers. However Russia is self-sufficient and independent while combined with the rest of Europe is as big or bigger than China. The US become a Chinese satrapy or client unit in a few months. China will have full control of our economy while being able to directly influence Barry’s administration.

This will end Aryan governance of the US as the several attacks on the Aryan intellect recently, notably the basketball brouhaha, are intended to influence the Aryan vote in this year’s congressional elections. It is very likely that the Reds, or Democrats, will get at least two thirds of the House and all of the Senate seats up for grabs. Controlling the polls as they do the results would be unlikely to go White.

At that point Barry, Red and Negro, will be able to control legislation, no longer having to rely on spurious Executive Orders, without let or hindrance. This is in the bag and there is no question about what he will do. He will probably bide his time until after the elections.

However Barry does not represent we Whites and Aryans so we are under no obligation to observe any laws against us he may pass or, actually, any laws he has already passed or may pass.

Putin is our man. Stay alert and prepare to be firm.

Think globally, act locally.

Which side are you on?




Unintended Humor From France Again


Unintended Humor From France Again


R.E. Prindle

Hello Lunacy Central?  I have a case to report.  France is at it again.  This time they tried to nail the Bobber himself, Bob Dylan.  That was right after awarding him the Legion of Honor.  For having a scratchy voice and still soldiering on, I guess.  Apparently it would have been unseemly to give him the Legion of Honor and then slap him in jail or a year and fine him 62,000 dollars.

I guess he murdered an African and then shouted ‘Nigger, take that.’ making it a ‘hate’ crime.  A year and 62,000 would have been appropriate for some thing like that.

But no!  In a country known for draconian punishments for freely expressing forbidden thoughts one has to search Bob’s ‘hate’ speech carefully for cause.  I think Bob was a little coarse and I too find his comments objectionable and puerile but for different reasons than the French.  Bob can send me the 62K and keep the year for himself.  Enjoy.  Hey, we’re all free or in jail depending on our attitude toward life  Right Bob?

Bob said in an interview with Mikal Gilmore of Rolling Stone the following:

This country is too fucked up about color.  It’s a distraction.  People at each others throats just because they are of a different color.  It’s the height of insanity, and it will hold any nation back.  Or anything back.  Blacks know that some whites didn’t want to give up slavery- that is if they had their way, they would still be under the yoke, and they can’t pretend they don’t know that.  If you’ve got a slave master or Klan in your blood, blacks can sense that.  That stuff lingers to this day  Just like Jews can sense Nazi blood and the Serbs can sense Croatian blood.

Now, I just object to the whole tenor of his opinion, which might better have remained unexpressed, but I don’t think Bob should be shot at dawn.  Of course the ‘humane’ French have thrown in the towel on capital punishment.  By golly, if you can detect the racism in Bob’s quote the French are only going to throw you in prison for a year and fine you 62K.  That’s equitable isn’t it?

If you haven’t figured out Bob’s offence yet it’s the part about the Serb and Croat.  Something called the Representative Council of the Croatian Community and Institutions in France got a hair up their collective rectum and filed a complaint.

What Croatian institutions if France do they have and why?  What is this a little Croat cancer cell in France?  Is it going to grow and do battle with the Muslim and African cells  and any French who might claim France their turf too?  Jesus, the courts are going to spend a few tens or hundreds of thousands to try that?  As we say in the US, Croats- get a life.

Fortunately for Bob a lifetime of some sort of service to the revolution got him a reprieve.  Get this: The charges against Bob have been dropped because he didn’t expressly authorize  Rolling Stone to publish his egregious gaffe in France.  Good thinking Bob.  Always protect your back.

But, somebody has to pay.  The charges have been transferred to Michael Birnbaum who publishes French Rolling Stone.  He can now look forward to a year in jail and a loss of 62,000 smackers for being a very poor proof reader.

Good luck France or overseas Africa or whatever you call the place and may your legislators rot in hell.

Let’s give the Galliano law a rest.

Part II: Henry Ford And The Aaron Sapiro Case

Part II: Henry Ford And The Aaron Sapiro Case


R.E. Prindle

The ostensible reason for Sapiro pressing a suit against Ford was that Cameron writing for the Independent published an article claiming that Sapiro was trying to seize control of the commodity of wheat.  Sapiro said this was preposterous, but how preposterous was it really?

As I understand Sapiro’s plan the producers, that is the farmers, would concentrate exclusively on farming within the collective Sapiro would organize.  Sapiro would then place himself as the middleman between the sellers, that is the farmers, and the buyers.

Now, that is exactly the system the Jews had organized in Europe for hundreds of years. In Europe the Jews controlled many commodities such as grain, salt and as soap became commodified in the nineteenth century that too.

As rootless cosmopolitans, so to speak, the Jews had a presence in all European countries while employing Yiddish as their universal language.  Thus, with ethnic solidarity as opposed to national Europeans who each spoke a different language and had different customs, ways of doing business.  The Jews were uniquely positioned to move bulk items across borders with minimum confusion.  For the European view see the movie The Jew Suss,

That is essentially what Sapiro was trying to set up in an increasingly global market where commodities were transferred around the world.  This is exactly what Ford accused him of.

However Sapiro then confused the issue by leveling counter charges of anti-Semitism.  The issue is not the issue.  Whether Sapiro who is described as a difficult personality and therefore expendable was a foil of the international Jewish government conspiring with them to attack Ford isn’t presently clear or whether he acted on his own.  Highly doubtful that.

Whichever he waited until 1924 to file his suit leaving grounds to believe the Jews were waiting for a convenient non issue to obscure their real intent- that of creating a ‘hate speech’ law with the teeth of that of present France.

Thus the trial turned not on Ford’s charge but as the American Bar Foundation (

http://americanbarfoundation,org/research/project/19 ) titles the above link, Suing Henry Ford: America’s First Hate Speech Case.  The title should be a misnomer although that is how the Sapiro case is now viewed.


Suddenly the central issue of the trial was not individual libel but hate speech.  That development was decidedly unwelcome to Louis Marshall, the prominent constitutional lawyer who was also president of the American Jewish Committee.  Marshall believed that no individual should recover damages from actions leading Jewish defense organizations to avoid litigating anti-Semitism unless it interfered with the civil rights of individual Jews.  Mere insults…did not meet this standard.


As there was no legal crime involved as anti-Semitism while what constitutes ‘hate speech’ has never been legally defined or had been legally made a crime the focus of the trial was completely shifted away into irrelevant litigation.  Marshall probably realized this as he was a lawyer.  Unfortunately neither Cameron, Ford nor their lawyer had thought this thing through.

So actually ‘hate speech’ in this trial was a paranoid conception in the mind of the Jews while Ford’s charges of commodity manipulation was ignored.

Ford’s reasons for criticizing Jews comes next.

Part III is located on my idynamo.wordpress.com site.