Neo-Racism Based On The Concept Of
Whites Genetically Weaker Than Blacks, Study Finds.
White Americans are both genetically weaker and less diverse than their black compatriots, a Cornell-led study finds.
Thus the Fox News story is headlined and summarized. One will search in vain in the body of the article to discover what that ‘weakness’ consists of.
The summarization then says that white Americans are both not only genetically weaker but also genetically less diverse. Not being told of what weakness consists we are now left up in the air as to the desirability of diversity much less what that consists of.
The obvious purpose of the article and study is to advise white Americans that any notion of superiority they may feel over their black ‘brethren’ is ill-advised and misplaced.
Contrary to all appearances Africans are the superior people because of a claimed genetic ‘strength’ and ‘diversity’ of genes. James Watson be damned.
We are told that of millions of genes in the body of a Homo Sapiens 10K were selected to be examined. We are left ignorant as to the basis of selection. Within these selected 10K Africans had more ‘diversity.’ Besides which Africans only went through one population ‘bottleneck’ that we may presume, following Mr. Bustamante’s logic, that a lot if diversity was squeezed out of those 10K genes and ‘bad’ mutations were introduced. Whites passed through a second population ‘bottleneck’ 30K years ago that squeezed out a whole lot more of ‘diversity’ and introduced a multitude of ‘bad’ genes into the selected 10K genes not present in the more varied African population that had more success in weeding them out. Are you following this?
So, we have a racial hierarchy of which the Africans are the Master Race.
Mr. Bustamante and his confreres unblushingly tell us:
As would be expected with the “out of Africa” theory…Africans had the greatest amount of genetic diversity followed in turn by Middle Easterners, the Europeans and South Asians at about equal levels, then East Asians.
Native Americans had the least genetic diversity of all, indication that part of the world was settled last.
So, following the Master Race of Africans, in order of descent are Middle Easterners, Europeans and South Asians almost equal but not quite, then East Asians and the poor shlubs at the bottom of this racial hierarchy are the ‘Amerinds.’
Middle East is too embracing to have much meaning since that includes Jews, Arabs and Iranians. Three very different peoples. It is rather surprising to find the Jews, hitherto imagined to the the supreme race, placed behind the Africans. But, I’m sure Mr. Bustamante et al. know whereof they speak.
It is a little surprising also to find the Amerinds which includes everyone from Eskimos to Mexicans placed so firmly at the bottom of the racial hierarchy. Even though Homo Sapiens has existed for 150K years or so the Amerinds who only left the old world for the new 8K years or so ago so are naturally least diverse because the Americas were the last place in the world settled. One imagines things could have been different if the Africans had arrived 8K years ago instead of the Asians. And also, the Amerinds could have gone through a third population bottleneck that stripped them of whatever remained of genetic strength or diversity.
There we have it friends, Neo-Racism as devised by the Ivy League, the greatest scholars of our times. The old racism with Whites on top and Africans at the bottom is bad, bad, bad but Neo-Racism with Africans at the top and poor shlub Mexicans et al. at the bottom is good, good, good.
Evidently it is not what you know but who you know.
Diversity is strength.