The Current Crop Of European And American War Criminals

 

The Current Crop Of European And American

War Criminals

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Following on the heels of the Parisian Massacre by the Moslems a second attack has been struck in San Bernardino in the US claiming fourteen or more lives and thirty-some victims. The authorities have no notion of the motive. We do.

The motive is clear to all but instead of acknowledging the attack as an act of war the Criminal in the White House rushes to call for a ban on firearms. Guns are not the problem dear Barry, the problem is ideology. Remove the ideology and the shootings, the bombings, the rapes, the murders will cease. These attacks will not end until you accept that you are mistaken in your idiotic encouragement of these paramilitaries by importing them in their millions. You must be insane.

You and your fellows in England, France and Germany are the true war criminals who should be removed from office and tried like the other war criminals at Nuremberg.

Your evil cohort in Germany, Angela Merkel, is knowingly encouraging the enemies of the German people while disarming the Germans making them defenceless. Merkel is personally responsible for the rapes of these thousands of innocent women. She should be given hundreds of life sentences to be served successively.

Hollande in France as well as the English idiot are no different. They should be removed and tried. Sarkozy with his moronic plan of forcing White women to sleep with Africans should be castrated, put on display and then shot. Hitler was saintly compared to these criminals.

As for Obama his crimes are mounting daily. He should be held responsible for each death in San Bernardino. The problem was ideology not guns. Remove the fellow now. Escort him to the door. He has already said that as long as he is in office he will bring in as many of these Moslem paramilitaries as he can. Stop him now. This is an emergency.

His supporters are no less guilty. Why Congress is even discussing vetting or not vetting the paramilitaries is ridiculous. Can their mouths form the words No Way? No discussion, just NO WAY. They too are guilty of the Berdoo shooting and the many that will follow as the season develops as no effort is being made to discourage the Moslems.   They are all guilty, don’t kid yourself.

Instead three White boys who have committed no crime but are alleged to be only ‘plotting’ retaliation are on their way to prison and long sentences for committing no crime. Think of that! They have committed no crime. These men who have done nothing should be defended strenuously by any means necessary.

If we take no action in either case we have only ourselves to blame.

Part III: Is Paris Burning?

 

 

Is Paris Burning?

Part III

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Anent the Moslem act of war in Paris in which perhaps as many as a thousand people were killed, maimed and injured not to mention the collateral damage to the thousands of related lives our Presidential candidate, Donald Trump, has pointed out a significant fact. European citizens are unarmed and defenseless. They are intentionally being kept so by the criminally inept and incompetent Insiders in office. Apparently these morons and incapable of understanding the trap they have put Europe in.

Upon a signal no different than the one in ancient Roman Alexandria and Cyprus in the second century when the Jews descended upon the unsuspecting people and murdered a half million the Moslems armed with assault rifles, grenades and who knows what weapons will be able to murder defenseless millions of Europeans. This is what is known as a blood bath that will far exceed any so-called criminal WWII holocaust. You had better take this seriously, untold misery is awaiting Europe. Every European should be issued an assault rifle and ammunition at government expense. They should be allowed to use it rather than seeing the African and Moslem barbarians rape European women and assault the men. If the Insiders consider allowing them to do so unopposed is the rule of law then they should be arrested as accomplices.

Moslem rapists and murderers should be summarily executed by European paramilitaries. This is war; no crimes are involved. Trump is absolutely correct; his critics are fools.

As for the criminal Insiders they should remember the fate of Mussolini while no measures have been taken against the Moslem troops. Hollande closed the borders, indeed! Who does this nitwit think he’s fooling?

Instead he asks the French people to suffer their casualties in silence. Whose side is this nitwit on? Instead of acknowledging those paramilitaries are soldiers engaged in asymmetrical warfare carrying the Middle East atrocities back to Europe he points out that one of the soldiers was a petty criminal. In other words, this is just a crime rather than an act of war. Get with it Insider idiots; they are not petty criminals they are soldiers foraging for supplies. This is war Insider idiots and you are failed generals. You are to be replaced and treated as criminal incompetents and hanged just as at Nuremburg.

As Donald Trump seems to understand the situation well, it is important that we of the Outsider Parties see that he is elected. He is our last best chance before street warfare becomes more imperative in both Europe and North America than it is now.

Gird your loins, my friends.

Part II: Is Paris Burning?

 

 

Part II: Is Paris Burning?

by

R.E. Prindle

 

On Friday the thirteenth, that symbolic unlucky day, the Moslem paramilitaries unleashed a major assault on Paris killing, maiming and wounding perhaps close to a thousand unsuspecting Parisians. The French security forces say they hadn’t a clue that a major enemy operation was planned.

The incredible response that no counter-attack by French citizens was to be permitted is cowardly. This is an act of war not a criminal act. No response is to be permitted…that means that any French citizens who do so will be arrested as criminals, sentenced and incarcerated.   The French Insider elite running France commanded the emasculation of French Outsider citizens in favor of the Moslem enemy forces. No response? Shame, shame on Hollande and his cowardly government.

The Insider moral reprobates still refuse to admit that a monumental religious war is being waged by the Moslems in which they aid and abet the enemy by their pusillanimous ideology.

We of the Outsider Parties of the US, Great Britain and Europe unanimously require the Insider Elites of the Aryan World including Obama, Hollande, Cameron and Merkel confess their incompetence and relinquish the reins of power to we Outsiders to conduct this war. If they fail to do so they will find the Moslems a minor irritant to their continuance.

The Insider Elite have committed grievous crimes against humanity equaling those of Stalin, Hitler, Mao and Pol Pot by allowing millions of the enemy to occupy key positions in all the Western States including the US and Canada. Thus the enemy is in our very midst while we are unarmed, forbidden to act, where now death and carnage can be the only result. This current Moslem assault is not the end of the war but only the beginning. It is not a crime but an act of war.

The Elite morons are confounded by this act of war unable to comprehend it although tens of millions of more able and realistic minds have consistently pointed out the consequences of their action for decades.

The Elites response was to condemn us as bigots and ‘domestic terrorists’. Down with them! Upon abdication they will be treated as war criminals on the same basis as the Nazis at Nuremburg.

The have betrayed us and their responsibilities.

Step down now while ye yet may.

Is Paris Burning?

Is Paris Burning?

by

R.E. Prindle

An interesting thought exercise  is to compare Paris under the Nazi occupation with that of the Moslem infestation of today and then marvel at what people are putting up with in the difference of perception.

Under the Nazi occupation there was complete order and safety.  There were no riots.  What’s happening today makes even the ’68 insurrection look like a fly on an elephant’s behind.  While the MSM is mum on the horrors the Moslems are causing in Paris and France the real situation can seen on sites like Global Truth.  There’s a war going on folks.  The destruction caused in the last decade or so is nothing compared to what is coming.  The heavy artillery is moving into Moslem areas, AK 47s, anti- tank weapons, you name it; rockets to bring down planes, fighters or commercial, what difference?

As in the United States where Negroes have occupied cities, Moslems have occupied French cities.  The French army, presumably manned by real Frenchmen, no Jews, Moslems or Africans, are preparing for street to street fighting.  Those anti-tank weapons the Moslems have are going to come in handy.  Damascus comes to Paris and Lebanon to France.  We all knew but…

Well, the French asked for it, at least the Liberals asked for it, demanded it, the rest will have to endure it.  Once the shooting begins the borders will be blown wide open.  Moslem reinforcements in the millions will flow in.  Moslem reinforcements have already taken positions in Germany.  The invasion of France this time won’t be Nazis but Moslems.  Believe me the French would rather have the Nazis.  Combatants will flow in from Germany to the East, probably Italy from the South and maybe Spain.  Maritime invasion across the Mediterranean into the maritime provinces will keep the army hopping, especially as insurrections will probably be nationwide rather than local and with no defined front.

Let me give you guys a tip:  sink the boats at sea, let ’em drown.  It’s you or them.

Unlike Americans who all have weapons real French citizens are unarmed so that a slaughter of French citizens like the slaughter of Alexandrians and Cyprians during the Jewish War of ancient Rome will probably make the European Holocaust look like child’s play much less when compared to the trivial Jewish holocaust.

The hammer is about to fall, there will be no mercy, it is kill or be killed.  Spare no man, woman or child.  If the Moslem insurrection succeeds in France then all Europe will be under siege.  Germans especially ought to arm all its German nationals now in preparation for their Moslem uprising.  It is kill or be killed.  Man up, laddies and lassies; forget that Jewish holocaust guilt, it was never necessary anyway, and do what you have to do.  Make old Wolf proud of you.

When the shooting starts let us pray that a stray bullet finds those Liberals who betrayed you.  Tell me, is Paris burning?

The Great Religious War Of The Twenty-First Century

 

The Great Religious War

Of The Twenty-First Century

by

R.E. Prindle

 

The Moslem conquest of the world in the modern era has been simmering for some time.  Lothrop Stoddard sounded the alarm in 1922.  Of course the Moslem religion as propounded by the prophet Mohammed was posited as a universal religion to be imposed by force.  Worldwide conquest began immediately with armies sweeping into central Asia and India through the Iranian corridor, against the armies of the Byzantines, across North Africa and into Europe via the Iberian Peninsula.  As is well known the Moslem forces were checked at Tours in France by Charles The Hammer.

The Europeans then rallied and the reconquest of southern France and Spain began.  After conquest of the Byzantines at the end of the fifteenth century the pressure then ran through the Balkans, Southern Russia and to the Gates of Vienna.  The Moslems were driven back to their European enclave of the former Byzantine capitol of Constantinople, renamed Istanbul.  The Moslem ethic was then apparently exhausted as they became quiescent and stultified.

Awakened by WWI but hopelessly overmatched by the West militarily they began to develop techniques of asymmetrical warfare.  Having both psyched out the West and installed massive colonies through peaceful infiltration and/or traitorous assistance of Western governments they are now in a position to attempt the seizure of control.

They have over the last decade or two or three succeeding in imposing civil disabilities on the native European population through the legislation of traitorous European governments.  European legislatures have made it a criminal offense for natives to criticize Moslems or offer resistance to insults or even murder.  Under protection of the law Moslems have in essence enslaved thousands, perhaps tens of thousands, of young girls and women.  This enslavement is characterized as ‘grooming’.  The term is apparently meant to be less offensive than the criminal and illegal and accurate term enslavement.

This ‘grooming’ has been with the consent of the national governments.  Men have been sent to prison for calling attention to the practice.  It is therefore impossible not to believe these governments are manned by secret or crypto Moslems as traitors to their electorates and country.  These government officials should be arrested and removed from office as traitors immediately.  This includes every existing European and American government.

Just as native populations have been under a regime of civil disabilities that have disenfranchised them in their own countries a severe regime of civil disabilities must be imposed on Moslems until they either return to their own countries leaving all possessions and assets behind or renounce this evil religion and expiate their crimes.  They cannot  remain Moslems and stay in the West.

Even China is driving them out.  This must be done in the West immediately.  Do not hesitate.

Moslem/Jewish Danger Signals From France

 

Moslem/Jewish Danger Signals

by

R.E. Prindle

 http://blogs.forward.com/sisterhood-blog/212649/dont-write-off-france-just-yet/?

Symi Rom-Rymer writing on the Jewish Sisterhood site linked above in an article superciliously titled Don’t Write Off France Yet make this comment:

When news broke about the hostages being held in the kosher supermarket in Paris, I began to hear rumblings on social media about rampant French anti-Semitism and anti-Semitic acts perpetrated by French Muslims.  At one point on Friday, I overheard a conversation between two women at a synagogue in Washington DC, in which Holocaust comparisons were frequently invoked.  In yet another response to the attacks, an American Rabbi likened Jews to the canary in the proverbial coal mine.

France [that is the French ‘community’] has long struggled with integration of its minority communities- Jewish and Muslim alike.  The French government’s inability to handle tensions over international politics like the Middle East conflict and the disintegration of social cohesion at home has only furthered simmering resentments.

Such muddled thinking as Miss Rom-Rymers’ almost defies analysis.  Her American rabbi’s comment about Jews being the canary in a coal mine seems most apt and even prescient.  Canaries, of course, were taken into the coal mines  because they were early victims to accumulating poisonous gases.  When the canary keeled over it was time to get out.

Indeed inter-community tensions may be near the breaking point and not only in France.  The fantasy the ruling sect of the West entertains that many cultures can maintain distinct identities while living side by side is rapidly being disproved, although god knows there are legions of us who understood in advance of the immigration, including every Moslem alive and I suspect also the Jews who instigated the tension in the first place.  As usual the Jews have cast themselves as the wise old heads and in this case the French as muddlers who just can’t get it right.

The writing about the Charlie Hebdo incident the article refers to seems to want to maintain that multi-culturalism in the West is a success except for rising anti-Semitism in the French community and anti-Semitic acts by the Moslem community, that is, the occasional 9/11 or Charlie Hebdo.

Thus, even though these tensions are actual wars going on in France, that is, on the one hand between Moslems and Jews and on the other Moslems and French, with Moslems being the aggressor in each case.  Miss Rom-Rymer places the fault for the tensions on French men and women because of their failure to integrate the warring parties.  She doesn’t give any indication of how this might be done however.

One must assume that the failure to make Jews and Moslems lie down together is completely one sided.  Even though neither Moslems nor Jews wish to give their identities up, seeking to impose those on French people.   I suppose that means that the French are stubbornly holding onto their trashy French identity.

Apparently Miss Rom-Rymer and her Jewish brethren fail to comprehend that only one identity can survive over time.  In fact the most stubborn, or perhaps fanatical, participant will survive and that one will be transmuted by the others in the process.  Thus when the Moslems stormed into Iran they imposed civil disabilities on the Iranians so that in the long run it was easier to become Moslem and equal rather than Iranian and groaning under onerous civil disabilities.

However, as the Moslems did so they created an Iranian strain of Moslemism called Shia while the Arabs became Sunnis.  The Iranians while converted religiously remained unconquered waging Shiite wars with the Sunnis from then to the present.

So, the disintegrating social cohesion, if there ever was any cohesion, in France is because the French government refuses to accept the consequences of allowing millions  of intolerant historically retarded Moslems into the country without imposing severe civil disabilities on them thus  requiring them to rethink their position among Western mores.  At this stage it looks as though France will be as Moslem as Iran in fifty years and with their own brand of Euro-Moslemism.  And just as hostile toward the Sunni and Shiite retards as the Shiites are now of the Sunnis.

The crisis in Judaism is mounting fast.  Truly as the rabbi says, the Jews are the canary in the coal mine.  It is time for them too to rethink their position vis-à-vis both the West and the Moslems.  They are a stone in the shoe making everyone uncomfortable.  They may have to choose conversion or be removed.  Both Moslems and the West have little care for them.  There are enough other irritants than to tolerate them.

Miss Rom-Rymer might take a few moments to contemplate the conversation she overheard between the two women in the DC synagogue.

Unintended Humor From France Again

 

Unintended Humor From France Again

by

R.E. Prindle

Hello Lunacy Central?  I have a case to report.  France is at it again.  This time they tried to nail the Bobber himself, Bob Dylan.  That was right after awarding him the Legion of Honor.  For having a scratchy voice and still soldiering on, I guess.  Apparently it would have been unseemly to give him the Legion of Honor and then slap him in jail or a year and fine him 62,000 dollars.

I guess he murdered an African and then shouted ‘Nigger, take that.’ making it a ‘hate’ crime.  A year and 62,000 would have been appropriate for some thing like that.

But no!  In a country known for draconian punishments for freely expressing forbidden thoughts one has to search Bob’s ‘hate’ speech carefully for cause.  I think Bob was a little coarse and I too find his comments objectionable and puerile but for different reasons than the French.  Bob can send me the 62K and keep the year for himself.  Enjoy.  Hey, we’re all free or in jail depending on our attitude toward life  Right Bob?

Bob said in an interview with Mikal Gilmore of Rolling Stone the following:

This country is too fucked up about color.  It’s a distraction.  People at each others throats just because they are of a different color.  It’s the height of insanity, and it will hold any nation back.  Or anything back.  Blacks know that some whites didn’t want to give up slavery- that is if they had their way, they would still be under the yoke, and they can’t pretend they don’t know that.  If you’ve got a slave master or Klan in your blood, blacks can sense that.  That stuff lingers to this day  Just like Jews can sense Nazi blood and the Serbs can sense Croatian blood.

Now, I just object to the whole tenor of his opinion, which might better have remained unexpressed, but I don’t think Bob should be shot at dawn.  Of course the ‘humane’ French have thrown in the towel on capital punishment.  By golly, if you can detect the racism in Bob’s quote the French are only going to throw you in prison for a year and fine you 62K.  That’s equitable isn’t it?

If you haven’t figured out Bob’s offence yet it’s the part about the Serb and Croat.  Something called the Representative Council of the Croatian Community and Institutions in France got a hair up their collective rectum and filed a complaint.

What Croatian institutions if France do they have and why?  What is this a little Croat cancer cell in France?  Is it going to grow and do battle with the Muslim and African cells  and any French who might claim France their turf too?  Jesus, the courts are going to spend a few tens or hundreds of thousands to try that?  As we say in the US, Croats- get a life.

Fortunately for Bob a lifetime of some sort of service to the revolution got him a reprieve.  Get this: The charges against Bob have been dropped because he didn’t expressly authorize  Rolling Stone to publish his egregious gaffe in France.  Good thinking Bob.  Always protect your back.

But, somebody has to pay.  The charges have been transferred to Michael Birnbaum who publishes French Rolling Stone.  He can now look forward to a year in jail and a loss of 62,000 smackers for being a very poor proof reader.

Good luck France or overseas Africa or whatever you call the place and may your legislators rot in hell.

Let’s give the Galliano law a rest.

The Jews vs. John Galliano

The Jews vs. John Galliano

by

R.E. Prindle

How’s This For Blonde?

The great European Affaire Galliano has not yet ended.  A little over a hundred years ago the great Affaire Dreyfus raged through France setting the country at loggerheads.  In the great Jewish war against Europe the Dreyfus Affaire established the Jews as a semi-autonomous culture within France.  One wonders what the Galliano Affaire is meant to achieve.  Perhaps only redressing Dreyfus by inflicting a humiliation on a Franco-English hairdress… uh, I mean Fashionista.

The Jews have already forced through a French law making it a criminal offense to utter a single word of criticism about themselves.  Perhaps the Galliano Affaire was provoked to show that no star is bright enough to escape retribution for the least, the very least, of utterances spoken in obscurity, almost one might say, a dream, while the persecuted is so draconically punished out of all proportion to the imagined offense that anyone with even a shred of ‘anti-Semitism’ in their heart will be cowed into submission.

Thus, while Galliano escaped any punishment at the hands of the French court save being criminalized, the Affaire is being reopened on the issue of whether Galliano can be allowed to be rehabilitated to the rank of a mere human being.  He has been excommunicated if not outlawed.  One would consider this as subject for the opera buffe, a comic opera, if it weren’t so serious for Galliano and actually the future of France as an independent country and not a satrapy of Israel.

Thus the July 2013 issue of Vanity Fair features what must be a 10K word article supposedly pleading for Galliano’s readmission to the human race and possible reinstatement to gainful employ.  The article is written by one Ingrid Sischy, an assimilationist Jew.  Naturally a Jew would be selected to reintroduce Galliano to humanity.  I don’t know what Vanity Fair pays for very long articles, possibly 10 to 25K or even more, but the Jews continue to profit from the Affaire to the exclusion of Aryans.  Twenty-five thousand might be pocket change in those circles but still, it does fill the tank.

Apparently the enormity of a drugged out, drunken Galliano’s response to harassment as a poofter by a Jewish woman in a Paris street bar is such that two years after the verdict the wound is still fresh in the hides of Jews that even the Chief Rabbi of France, Gilles Bernheim, another assimilationist Jew going by his first name, is still smoldering.  P. 121:

Ingrid Sischy

Quote:

Not everyone has believed it to be appropriate to have Galliano in their midst.  Gilles Bernheim, the chief rabbi of France, rejected requests to meet with him.

Unquote.

But, to be fair and balanced, same page:

Quote:

On the other hand, Rabbi Barry Marcus, [another assimilator] of Central Synagogue, one of London’s oldest Orthodox synagogues, has begun a dialogue with Galliano.  The designer attended a service one Saturday morning…wearing a tallith and kipa.

Unquote:

So, just as Dreyfus returned from Devil’s Island, Galliano is being drawn back from limbo.  Apparently a tit for tat.  Marcus is holding out a warming hand to the sinner to raise him from his degraded depths:

Quote:

As a Jew and a rabbi, if anybody makes a mistake- and we all make mistakes- built into Judaism is the concept of giving a person another chance, or forgiving.  So much of who we are and how we operate as human beings is built on that very principle.

Unquote.

Well, gosh, yes.  Magnanimity is just so Jewish.  One can’t be more holy than the Jews.  Such magnanimity is seldom seen on the planet other than in Judaism.    But let’s look at Galliano’s so-called crime and its circumstances.  Miss Sischy begins her article with this dramatic paragraph:

Quote:

May as well face the worst of it right away, so here it is:  The transcript of a cell phone video of an encounter at La Perle, a bar in Paris’ Marais district, which stunned the fashion world, and millions of people outside that world, with its mix of inexcusable anti-Semitism, childish bile, and outrageous obscenity.  The video was first posted on the Web site of the British tabloid The Sun on February 28, 2011, and immediately went viral:

Woman:  “Are you blond?”

Man:  “No, but I love Hitler.  People like you would be dead today.  Your mothers, your forefathers, would be fucking gassed, and fucking dead.”

Woman:  “Oh my god!  Do you have a problem?”

Man:  “With you?  You’re ugly.”

Woman:  “With all people.  You don’t want peace?  You don’t want peace in the world?”

Man:  “Not with people that are ugly.”

Woman:  “Where are you from?”

Man:  “Your asshole.”

Unquote.

If the above is accurate there is no mention of Jews whatever.  Apparently the subject of world peace as a non-sequitur is uppermost in the woman’s mind not Judaism.  For the people who gave us Lenny Bruce to complain about obscenity is obscenity itself.  The Jews who were responsible for breaking down the barriers of bad language now complain because someone  follows their example.  There is no mention of Jews so there can be no anti-Semitism in the above quote.

As to the woman asking ‘Are you blond?’ that would imply that the first part of the conversation has been omitted.  We are at a loss as to who first initiated the exchange or how provocative it may have been.  ‘Are you blond?’ is either a taunt or a sexual invitation.

There is also a question as to how Galliano would have known the woman was Jewish. It is true that the Mastermind of All Time, Albert Einstein said that he could tell a Jew at sight from a mile away but few Aryans can.  Since the woman wouldn’t have appeared to Jewish to a besotted, drugged out poofter like Galliano then I have to assume that she announced that she was Jewish.

While Galliano may be highly regarded as a fashion designer by Fashionistas, I see him a comic costumier and in the video I saw he was amusingly at his best.  An obvious poofter even to the untrained eye.  Was the woman mocking his sexuality.  I’m afraid we may never know now as that evidence has been deleted.  As this incident was an obvious set up, and I do know set ups, I suspect the Jews themselves were the obvious culprit creating a faux ‘anti-Semitic incident as is their wont.

How outraged did they really think those millions were?  And if millions were outraged, which is questionable, how many other millions, myself included, merely laughed and said:  ‘Here they go again?’  I mean, this isn’t the first time the trick has been tried, or the second, or third, or….

The court itself didn’t take the accusation seriously.  Their own investigation undoubtedly revealed that there was a great deal of provocation and misrepresentation.  Of course, the idiotic self-serving law is on the book.  Galliano wasn’t even adequately represented which is suspicious in itself.  But, as a law had been ‘violated’ I suppose the court was obligated to adjudicate it.

While it was possible to give Galliano jail time as well as a mega fine the court chose to impose no sentence while fining him only minimally and then suspending it.  I’m sure there is Freudian significance to the number but not being French it is beyond my ken.  This may be interpreted as a slap in the face to both this particular law and the Jews.  Both are absurd and somebody other than Galliano should be ashamed and shamed.

One is forced to believe the incident was merely a publicity stunt a la the Dreyfus Affaire to obtain not only a semi-autonomous status but a full autonomy above and superior to the French state and people- in effect a coup, a seizure of government so to speak.

While it isn’t possible for the Jews in the US to recreate their French position they have at least grouped themselves with all sub-cultures in the US against the dominant culture with their Anti-Aryan Hate Laws.  The US Constitution makes their progress a trifle more complicated but as part of their global plan they are only a step or two from autonomy above the US government.

It is time for a big anti-Semitic plot to be discovered in the US now.  From where it will come, who  the designated villain will be is unknown.  John Rocker?  He’s already been used up.  Who then?  Where?  When?

Oy Vey, What Next?

Inside Galliano’s Guilty Verdict

 

John Galliano And The Disgrace Of France

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/09/08/john-galliano-guilty-of-anti-semitism-and-racist-rants.html

     As anti-climatic as it is John Galliano was sentenced of 9/8/11 for the heinous crime of saying, sotto voce, ‘I love Hitler.’  Has France gone insane.  Did the judge watch the video taken of a private citizen sitting in a bar having an exchange  with a purportedly Jewish person who remained off camera while continuing the exchange rather than shutting up and moving away?

     This was an exchange of apparent insults apparently initiated by the Jews.  The Jewish party or parties seem to have been seated two tables away from Galliano so as not to be in the picture.   One camera is in front of Galliano filming him which is an invasion of his privacy and should not have been allowed as evidence.  The filmer did not have permission.  Another camera  is several feet behind the close in shooter but he still makes no effort to include the Jewish party in the picture.  We don’t really know who they are.  This must therefore be intentional and the incident is a frame up.

     Galliano is obviously responding to an insult that must have been initiated by the Jewish party.  It is apparent that a conversation or exchange of comments ensued since Galliano is responding.  Therefore as trouble makers they have no complaint and should have no sanctity except for this moronic French law under which this idiot Philip Virgitti is apparently entitled to sue for nearly half a million dollars because he alleges, it is not on the video, that Galliano called him ‘a fucking Asiatic bastard.’  Now, ask yourself, why would Galliano, who is sitting there placidly with his hands crossed in his lap, neither threatening nor agitated, speaking very calmly, volunteer an insult to another boozer sitting two tables away?  What word does Mr. Virgitti object to anyway- bastard, Asiatic or fucker?  How can the French be so insane as to make a provoked comment like that a crime potentially worth a half million dollars?

     Tracy MacNicoll of the provocative Daily Beast/Newsweek has no trouble empathizing with Signor Virgitti.  She appears scandalized that France didn’t revive to guillotine to deal with this ‘anti-Semitic’ crisis.  One can only suppose that Senor Virgitti is irreparably scarred for his remaining days by being called a ‘fucking Asiatic bastard.’   If that is all Mr. Virgiti has been called in his life he may consider himself fortunate indeed; he should have roamed the schoolyards I’ve traversed, he would have heard some truly astonishing name calling.  I was in the Navy too where I learned a whole bunch of new insults.  I think Senor Virgitti is at fault here- he probably got his just due.

     I might direct a few choice words here toward the Daily Beast/Newsweek but as they’re losing readers daily while managing to stay afloat in a flood of red ink they might see me as a profit center and initiate a suit.  Lord forbid their feelings should be hurt by being reminded that what they publish is trash.

Ideological Conflicts

Ideological Conflicts

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/06/dominique-strauss-kahn-case-the-maid-fights-back.html

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/06/dominique-strauss-kahn-case-the-maid-fights-back.html

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/07/06/the-impossible-timeline-in-dominique-strauss-kahn-case.html

     In following what is turning out to be a fairly remarkable Strauss-Kahn affaire there appears to be a strong contrast between stated ideological goals and actual practices.

     While one can’t trust any details that have been reported one thing is clear: the maid, whose name and picture are withheld, formerly reported to be a hardworking single African mom from the poorest village in the poorest country in the world, Guinea.  Herself being so poor as to be almost unbelievable and therefore, one presumes incapable of being guilty of even a traffic infraction although having been new to New York from the jungles of Guinea.  As we now learn she was not only not that poor but actually well off by Guinean standards which are the only standards that apply while admittingly being the very lowest standards in the world.  Still she was apparently well off, having status,  by Guinea’s admittedly deplorable level that she is now being accused of lying to the US Immigration authorities and hence subject to removal to, one assumes, any country that will take her.

     In addition she is now accused of ‘asylum fraud.’  Surely one of the most common offenses ever committed and not worthy of more than a tut tut.  She, we are now told fraudulently claimed that:

     Among other things, the complaint stated that the house she shared with her husband was destroyed by the police and soldiers acting on the behalf of the regime, and that she and her husband were beaten by them.

     In her statement, she attributed the beatings to the couple’s opposition to the regime.  She stated that during her husband’s incarceration, he was tortured, deprived of medical treatment and eventually died of maltreatment.  Following his death, according to her, she began to denounce the regime and finally fled the country in fear for her life.

     Well, all right.  Apparently the powers that be find such conduct by the Guinean ‘regime’ reprehensible while believing that regime changes are in order such as in Liberia, Libya, Egypt and other places, but not China and, say, France, the US, GB and places like that.

     While espousing the highest ideals for the poorest of the poor our own governments (I’m US) deprive us of all rights to determine out own future.  They sent all our jobs to China, Mexico and elsewhere.  We are compelled against our wills to accept the foulest sexual practices as normal and have them taught to our children.  We are compelled against our wills to accept dissimilar immigration  and what not.  We do object.  If we object we can, like Edgar J. Steele, be thrown into prison not unlike this poorest of the poor women of Guinea.  Steele is not poor and he lives in one of the richest countries where he enjoys all White Skin Privileges.  That alone surely makes him a bastard although not necessarily a criminal.

     Our own President, Barry Obama, has labeled his own dissenters to his regime Domestic Terrorists not too unlike the regime of Guinea.  Ask Edgar J. Steele. We are commanded to express certain opinions while at the same time  denied the use of certain strictly censored words.  If we violate those commands we are subject to fines and/or imprisonment.  Witness poor John Galliano in France.  He was essentially fined several tens of millions of dollars and faces a prison sentence for merely having exchanged  words with a certain privileged class of people.

     Strauss Kahn is apparently able to pull strings very effectively thus being able to weasel his way out of his situation even though his accuser has suffered discrimination, so-called, they were accepted customs in Guinea, all her very poor life.  I mean, my god, she was a woman, and you know what that means.  Edgar J. Steele, who committed no crime at all, whiles his life away in prison.

     So, tell me, what is the difference between Mubarak and Obama and the rest of them?  With these   new stringent ideological standards aren’t  they guilty of crimes against their dissident minorities?  Don’t they deny us our human rights to self-determination?  Or are certain regimes exempt from the rules they are imposing on others?  China, the US, Canada, GB, France etc. etc. etc.

     The question is, can the rule makers live up to their own ideals?  How do we think of Libya for instance?  Do the supposed crimes of one regime dealing with their dissident minorities cancel out the real crimes of the other?

     You tell me.