Pavlov, Freud And Community Organizing

by

R.E. Prindle

http://michellemalkin.com/2009/11/24/racial-terror-in-denver-that-wont-make-national-news/

     I’m sure everyone will have heard of Pavlov and his famous dogs.  Pavlov introduced the concept of Conditioning to the psychological lexicon.  The concept sort of flies under the radar in Freud’s version of psychoanalysis but the Old Master Fudger was quite taken by it.

     The question for Freud was how do you condition a whole people to respond to stimuli as you want them to do using a less noticeable  method than a dinner bell.

     Let’s look at the this recent Denver Danger with fresh eyes.  What sort of conditioning of  White people is going on here and for what result?

     It is clear the Jews and Africans intend the destruction of the White species.  If you haven’t looked into Noel Ignatiev or Kamau Kambon as yet may I suggest you do so and take what they’re saying seriously.   They are not standup comics.

     The problem is how do you get the majority White population to allow a much smaller Negro and Jewish minority to march them into extermination camps without resistance?  Well, you condition them to not respond to provocation but to placidly accept it until they are conditioned to taking it.

     In Denver, for instance, and this is going on all over the country, a group of paramilitary Africans systematically crippled numerous White people on the streets of Denver.   Now, these were not spontaneous attacks.  The FBI was called in which means that ‘community organizers’ and agitators crossed state lines for violent purposes.  I smell Chicago here and Chicago leads to the Great Black Hope in Washington DC.  The techniques used were those of professional sluggers resulting in broken jaws and fractured eye sockets.  Takes a little skill to do that.  These were not casual assaults they were organized.  Perhaps people were being trained to  organize other ‘communities’ in other cities.

     The Denver Police Chief thought it best, or said it was to prevent White vigilante patrols or defensive action, to keep the White public uninformed of this paramilitary activity.

     Now, we are told that thirty some members of this ‘gang’ or organized community were rounded up in a sweep.  That must mean that the members of this organization have been known for some time.  We are led to believe that these organizers will be put on prison relief for twenty years.  Will they?  What will happen when the furor, as small as it is, dies down?

     Thus the White public is conditioned to accept this terrorization passively without resistance or retaliation.  More incidents will be occurring  with greater frequency.  In each instance Whites will be prevented from responding in kind to this race war.   In other words they are being conditioned to non-resistance.  Now, people will say that Jews are White so how can they be referred to as not White.  Let me refer you  to a notorious figure known as A.J. Weberman.  In his online biography he proudly proclaims that he is not White, he is a Jew.  There’s your rationale.

     Soon neighborhoods will be invaded while Whites stand passively by as homes are looted and they and their neighbors beaten.   Then when White ‘troublemakers’ who write critical blogs are rounded up and sent to extermination camps for their own holocaust, Whites will have been conditioned to accept this crime without demur.

      Now, anyone who believes Africans don’t harbor a desire for revenge for slavery; or don’t think Jews feel shame for their passive acceptance of extermination had better reexamine their beliefs.

     The future is plain before you.  Will you accept your Pavlovian and Freudian conditioning and acquiesce in your own destruction?  I fear it.

Greil Marcus And Barry Obama

by

R.E. Prindle

http://watchingamerica.com/News/37869/from-savior-to-%E2%80%9Cparasite-in-chief%E2%80%9D/

     We have a German Communist criticizing something of which he knows aught.  Jorg Hantzschel writes in the Suddeutsche Zeitung quoting of all people super nerd Weird Old Greil Marcus:

     Obama is the face of the country and the country is therefore Obama’s face.  Anyone who questions Obama’s legitimacy questions his own legitimacy.  When a part of the nation rejects the president, it rejects the nation itself.

     Mr. Shaky Logic strikes again.  What a clinching conclusion to his article Mr. Hantzshel employs.  I presume he is of the SI sort of Communist since he relies on a quote from such a questionable source.

     Is Obama the face of the country or is he merely a talking head of the Judaeo-Communists?   As a talking head he has no meaning for anyone in the country except for his employers.  The burden of ‘White guilt’ is too heavy for some.  At any rate a few percentage points of the population is not the face of America.  Obama was elected by billions of dollars not people.  If he is the face of anything it is the face of Bankers.

     As is absolutely clear Obama was born in Kenya.  No one spends millions of dollars to concel the truth unless that truth does indeed prove his illegitimacy.  One need go no further for proof than that.  It is conclusive.  The accusations are so easy to stop it isn’t worth the breath to laugh Obama and his crony Greil Marcus to scorn.

     ‘When a part of the nation rejects its president it rejects the nation itself.”  Is this the clown speaking who rejected Johnson, Nixon, Reagan and both Bushes speaking?  Is this the fellow who rejects nationalism as xenophobia?  Who quotes:  Patriotism is the last refuge of the scoundrel?  Well then Scoundrel Marcus, since self-confession is good for the soul you must feel like a new man.  Weird old America, indeed.

     Authoritarian remarks like Marcus’  are deserving of the scorn marvelous scholars like Hannah Arendt and his own beloved Frankfurt School have heaped on such people.   Indeed, Greil, you must be guilty of having a Nazi authoritarian personality.

     And as far as Mr. Hantszhel is concerned he should note that I don’t write on German politics.  The reason is simple;  I don’t know anymore of German politics than he knows of American politics.  Go with what you know Jorg and avoid what you don’t.

Race War:  Dateline Denver

by

R.E. Prindle

     In Weimar Germany Communist Red Shirts and Nazi Brown Shirts roamed the streets duking it out with each other.  German newspapers in the hands of Judaeo-Communists denounced the Nazis as perpetrators while portraying the Communists as victims.

     The US is dangerously close to such a confrontation now between Black Skins and White Skins.

     Assaults on Whites by Blacks have been increasing at what should be seen as an alarming rate.  As in Weimar Germany Judaeo-Communists are giving Blacks free passes in the media.  Thus a  report of organized Black on White assaults by the Denver Post is of interest.

     A task force of Denver police, the FBI and the Denver District Attorney office investigated 26 incidents in which groups of black males verbally harassed, assaulted and at times robbed white and Latino males…

———–

     Victims were punched in the head, resulting in head injuries, broken noses and shattered eye sockets…

————-

    ” We have seen coordinated efforts before, but not by this large a group.”  (Denver Police Chief)  Whitman said.

     If the FBI was called in then there were operatives crossing state lines.

     This sort of thing is happening with increasing frequency all over America.  The incidents are going to increase in frequency, size and organization as the race war gains momentum while being unresisted.  As there are no consequences there is no reason for Black restraint.  Why not call it what it is: Race War, and act accordingly. 

     As no retaliation is allowed Whites there is no reason for such warfare not to escalate as Blacks become more emboldened.  Obama’s race dialogue takes on new meaning.  Rather than fearing that Whites might begin attacking Blacks in retaliation there is more to fear if they don’t.

     An old American axiom is that the best defense is a good offense.  Nothing could be truer.  Any defensive war must be lost.  Only when Blacks realize that there will be consequences will they tone it down.

     Forget the old America, that disappeared with 9/11.  This is the weird new post-Obama America.  Race warfare is here.   Get used to it and stand up for your rights.

Calling All Anti-Semites

We Know Who You Are

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.vdare.com/misc/091116_raehn.htm

      Mr. Raehn has presented an interesting and accurate analysis of the Jewish attempt to neutralize and emasculate the White male.  (See the above referenced analysis.)

     In his analysis he notes a group new to me called the Berkeley Public Opinion Study.  Berkeley meaning UCalifornia-Berkeley.  He appends a five page memorandum on the study dated March 13, 1945.  That means the study was undertaken during the war years before news of the extermination camps was known and while millions of the most worthy White men were dying for their country, itself evidence of anti-Semitism according to  the study.  That should be an eyebrow raiser for any reasonable person.

     First let us acknowledge that Jews believe that all non-Jews are anti-Semites whether they ever show evidence of it or not.  Thus the test to be administered is designed to not so much to detect overt anti-Semitism as to find it in everyone.  This means that those who designed and administered the test were paranoiacs.  Thus they were Jews who were paranoics as a national trait and paranoiacs who happened to be Jews.

     The memorandum states:

     The basic approach of the project as it now stands is an attempt to gain insight, in an indirect way, into the nature and scope of anti-Semitism [here the argument is shifted away from the individual Jew toward the belief system or ideology which shows the consfusion in the minds of the administrators].  Questionnaires have been distributed which do not contain a single reference to the Jewish problem but are so formulated that they possess high correlation – capable of being statistically proven- to the existence or non-existence of antisemitic ideas.

     The above is such deep dyed paranoia that if  it were exhibited by  an ‘anti-Semite’ he would locked up; yet these individuals professing Judaism cannot see in themselves what they clearly expect to see in others, that is, bigotry.  The test is designed to present the evidence that they want to find.  The tests ‘are so formulated that they possess high correlation- capable of being statistically proven’, in other words they require the right subjectivity  in interpreting them.  Obviously this is not an objective test but one that can only interpreted with the appropriate subjectivity.  In other words, the testers will certainly find what they want to find, evidence of anti-Semitism pervading the whole White culture.   Enemies on every side of themselves that have to be actively combated and if necessary exterminated.

     Now, Jews as whole confuse an attitude toward a person – anti-Semite- with a thought process or ideology- anti-Semitism-  to which they apparently believe there can be no legitimate objection, no negative critique which is not criminal in intent.  In other words, both Jews and Judaism are thought to be above or outside the law.

     The critque goes on:  (all italics mine)

     The reasons for this indirect approach are the following:  (a)  Anti-Semitism is an attitude rather than a matter of mere opinion,   or, at least, it is a problem as to what extent it is something confined  to the overt conviction of people and to what extent is is conditioned by deeper and often subconscious drives.  It is self-evident that questions plainly referring to Jews would not suffice to let us understand the attitudinal [irrational] factors, whereas indirect questions might lead us to a more comprehensive and deeper understanding of the background of the phenomenon. 

     So, the breathtaking assumption is that Jews themselves contribute nothing to the phenomenon.   Semitism is beyond criticism.  Any rejection of Semitism is therefore psychotic, an attitude…conditioned by deeper, irrational and often subconscious drives.

     In other words, any unbelievers in Semitism are essentially mentally diseased, insane.  Their conscious thinking mind has been overridden or conditioned by subconscious drives.   The writer isn’t clear as to exactly what he means by subconciously driven but we may assume that the drive is irrational and criminal.  Whether the drive comes from the individual or in the Freudian sense of the subconscious from outside the individual isn’t made clear.  It is possible that the ‘anti-Semite’ if controlled by an outside force is not responsible for his beliefs.  No overt actions are stated or implied here or necessary.  It’s all not even in the conscious mind but the unconsicous.

     As may easily be seen the writer has never even considered the difference between the terms anti-Semite and Semitism.  If asked to define Semitism he wouldn’t know what you were talking about.  I ask for a definition of Semitism of people who use the word anti-Semistism and I have had Rabbies tell me that there is no such thing as Semitism, then walk away allowing no room for discussion.

     Without meaningful definitions of anti-Semite and Semitism it is impossible for such tests to have any objective value.  Further the arrogance of a people who assert that anyone who isn’t willing to sacrifice his well being to their’s is absolutely astounding.  Why would anyone accept Semitism as a valid approach to living?

Old God, Almost Dead:

Was Paul A Jew?

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/arts-and-culture/books/20214/who-was-paul/

     I find Tablet Ezine- A New Read On Jewish Life an entertaining ezine.  I follow it regularly, indeed, daily.  While Tablet may consider itself a New Read I find it dusturbing that its contributors don’t seem to be able to think outside the Jewish box.  On that account I don’t see justification for the New Read slogan.  The writers seem absolutely fixated on this idelogy that began to take form at the cusp between the Taurean and Arien Ages assuming a complete form in the conflicts of the early Piscean Age.  Quite frankly such a primitive ideology has no place at the cusp of the Piscean and Aquarian Ages.  Only the most simplistic minds can find any degree of reality in the Jewish religion.  Where oh where is the evidence for that extra intelligence gene  claimed by Jews?

     Miss Shulewitz in the above article is not only fighting an ancient war that ceased to have relevance with the issue of the Origins Of Species, but she seems unaware of the difference between the Pauline and Johanine doctrines.  Essentially she is at war with the Pauline Roman Catholic Church, not Christianity.

     To quote her first paragraph, my comments interlined:

     Jews don’t like the apostle Paul.  Jesus they can live with; he was a good hearted rebbe whose words were twisted to say things he didn’t mean.

     The above is very simplistic.  She speaks as though Paul were still living rather than a two thousand year old dead Jew and merely a historical artefact.  He is barely out of the stone age in his outlook.   Being a Semite he hadn’t a glimmer of the scientific outlook.   While an important historical figure he’s little more than an intellectual curiosity.

     That the Catholic Church should remain Pauline is too bizarre for belief.  Paul sounds like a predecessor of the supremely evil Jacob Frank.

     Miss Shulevitz quotes Paul:

     For I delight in the law of  God after the inward man.  But I see another law in my members, warring against the law of my mind and bringing me into captivity to the law of sin which is in members.

     So Paul’s unconscious mind directs him irresistibly into the paths of evil.  His conscious mind and intelligence is defenseless aginst his unconscious.   The eighteenth century Jacob Frank merely said don’t risist give in, don’t fight it; indulge all your evil impulses until you’ve purged the evil from your body.  Frank’s attitude was seconded by Sigmund Freud.  Freud institutionalized the attitude not only amongst Jews but Gentiles.  An interesting thirder is the disgusting Woody Allen who bleats the theme in his movie Whatever Works.

     This aspect of Paul seems to have escaped Miss Shulevitz but apparently Jews don’t dislike Paul all that much since they follow his dictates.

     But Paul was the twister, and can’t be forgiven.

     Really?  Judaism is truly a living religion after all.  A dead Jew two thousand years old can’t be forgiven?  Is it necessary?  Perhaps he should apologize from beyond the grave.

        As a zealous convert who equated the Torah with death Paul is deemed the father of anti-Judaism (the theological critique of Judaism as a religion.)

     Are we to believe that without Paul there would be no critique of Judaism as a belief system?  Is Judaism above criticism? What makes Judaism unique among isms?  Nothing that I can see.

     …the grandfather of anti-Semitism (the hatred of Jews as a people.)

     The word Semistism indicates a belief system and not a people.  Once again what makes the Semitist belief system sacred and above criticism?  It is only the product of men’s minds.  Why should anyone tremble before Semitism?  Why should anyone blindly accept Semitism in toto?  Is Capitalism above criticism?  No.  So why should Semitism be above criticism?  It shouldn’t be.  It is the intensest bigotry to insist it is.  Irrational actually.

     …And the inventor of the theology of the cross.

     Pure bosh.  Miss Shulevitz should be ashamed of herself.

     One is left then with the conclusion that unless Judaism and hence Jews are to lift themselves out of their national psychological depression they themselves will have to radically change their ideology.  The term theology seems absolutely passe in this scientific day.  A old god merely in the way.

     Quite frankly the Jews are going to have to chuck this ancient baggage.  G-d, indeed.  Lighten their load a little.

     The god of Israel is decrepit, trudging disconsolately to his grave- a god, almost dead but certainly irrelevant and redundant.

Africa Triumphant

by

R.E. Prindle

     When Barack Obama was elected by deluded White voters of the United State the triumph of primitive African mental processes over European mental development emerged triumphant.  Few people seem to be paying attention to the not so subtle changes in the legal system.  

     Obama, born in Kenya, is following African tribal law.  Among the Zulu there was the practice of ’smelling out’ witches.  That is to say the chief, whether the early Chaka or the last of his line, Cetywayo, surveyed the land for dissidents or for other reasons, periodically  assembling the regiments for the ’smelling out.’  Witch doctors then roamed the ranks ’smelling out’  preselected ‘witches.’  They were immediately put to death.

     Chief Obama has inaugurated the same system.  He has called on the law to ’smell out’ critics and dissenters.  He has called upon them to ’smell out’ web sites critical of him, law agencies have been requestd to ’smell out’ dissidents of any sort and neutralize them through intimidation.   Arrest and slaughter will come later.

     Thus without anyone apparently noticing it he has boldly replaced the old legal system of checks and balances with African tribal chiefly law in which guilt is solely the will of the chief.

     Nothing is being done to check this ‘change WE can believe in’, so far it hasn’t even been acknowledged.  Now is the hour to stop the legal change and discard it.  If  you are afraid of the color of his skin then turn African, lose your rights and liberties.  If you have the will to assert your rights and freedoms whether being put under the frightful soul destroying spell ‘racist’ or not then chuck the Kenyan out.  There can be no possible reason for a man to spend millions of dollars to prevent the facts being known unless the facts are as alleged.  The fact is that Obama cannot legally be president as he was not born in this country but Kenya. 

     End the charade and put the guy on a plane back to Africa.  That is all that has to be done.   His presence is illegal.  Either that or submit to African tribal law.  Line up for the ’smelling out.’

Warren G. Harding, The Revolution And The Crash

by

R.E. Prindle

     The Geat Black Hope announced that this period would be one of  change ‘we’ can believe in so cast that spell for a very brief look at the US from 1917 to 1933 focusing on the presidency of that great President, Warren G. Harding.  Harding has been maliciously vilified because of his great success against the Revolution.

     The Jewish revolution which began in earnest in 1913 was reaching its apogee between 1917 and 1922 both in Europe and the US.  In 1919-20 the Jews were in full revolt in Europe while running a close second in the US.  During the Wilson administration Jews were nearly in control.  Massive bombings and criminal activities filled the year 1919 in the US which while not characterized as a revolution by US historians, which is to say Jewish historians, that is what it was.

     Millions of dollars of saving bonds had been stolen which were being cashed by Jews.  The lax Wilson administration allowed revolutionary criminals to run wild so that by 1921 when Harding took office the mails were being plundered at an alarming rate.  The country was in virtual anarchy.  When Harding assumed ofice in March of ‘21 he announced a return to ‘normalcy’ and aggressively acted to bring it about.  The return to ‘normalcy’ meant the suppression of the Judaeo-Communist revolution.  The Communist Party was outlawed while Federal agents aggressively pursued the Communist Parties.

     Will Hays was appointed Postmaster General actively attacking the postal criminals and restoring order there.  Wall Street then as now was out of control.  All those who stood up to the revolution had to be destroyed.  Some, such as the Dodge Brothers were murdered.  A failed murder attempt was made on Henry Ford also.  He was successfully defamed within a few years.

     The restorer of  ‘normalcy’, Warren G. Harding was both aggressively defamed and ultimately probably murdered.  The price of his success was to be condemned as the worst President of all time.  You don’t mess with Rohan.  Right?

     But with the suppression of the revolution the Republicans were firmly in power with little chance of being moved out unless another debacle such as TR and the Progressive Party. 

     Harding, Coolidge, Hoover and full prosperity.  As Alfred Rosenberg in his Myth Of The Twentieth Century stresses the real culprit was International Jewish Finance or the Global Money Trust of today.  Then as now new destructive financial instruments based on nothing but air were introduced.  It would take a major disaster to oust the Republicans.  Therefore a financial bubble was created not unlike our own recent housing bubble created by Greenspan and Wall Street.  The bubble burst in 1929 plunging the country into Depression.  This allowed FDR to be elected as a savior.  The Jews then rushed back into DC taking a major role in the administration.  Rather than solving the financial problem Roosevelt exacerbated  it from 1933 until 1942 when WWII began aborting the revolution while renewing prosperity until the housing debacle.

     It took a while but when the going gets tough the tough get schemeing.

Genes, Jews And Genius

by

R.E. Prindle

http://thisrecording.wordpress.com/2008/07/19/in-which-if-it-werent-for-the-chosen-people-youd-all-be-living-in-caves/

     The title of the above is ‘If It Weren’t For The Chosen people You’d All Be Living In Caves.’  It’s a serious assertion and common belief among Jews.  The blogger explains:  The following article is excerpted from a classic Charles Murray article in Commentary.  Jewish Genius is Murray’s title.  In it he purports to explain why he believes Jews are the most intelligent people on the planet.  We’ll get to the article soon but first let us examine the blogger’s title more closely.

     The obtuseness underlying the statement does not corelate with having supreme intelligence.  Man came out from caves tens of millennia before Jews came into existence.  Using the Bible, a Jewish book, as our authority (bad word, I know, but it works) it says that the Terahites came into existence 75 years before they were expelled from Ur, essentially for outrageous chutzpah.  The period in question was the end of the Taurianand the beginning of the Arien age.  According to the Jewish historian, Josephus, there was an astronomical, read astrological, dispute in which Abram defeated the Chaldean doctors who in anger expelled the Terahites, of which Abram was apparently a religious head.  The dispute was whether the gods were eternally Saturnian or whether they evolve with the Ages.

     So, at the time the Jews came into existence our ancestors had already created civilization a couple thousand years before and it was a supreme example.  Ours had already created structures that astonished the Terahites and would astonishAbram’s descendants even further 1500 years on.

     While the Chosen People were gingerly picking their way among the sheep droppings on their way to Padan Harran ours were discussing serious astronomical and astrological problems in the comfort of their luxurious apartments.  They humorously referred to their appartments as ‘caves.’

     Ah, expulsion!   First Paradise then Ur of the Chaldees.  When will it ever end?  Thanks for the helping hand fellas but we think you’re projecting.

     Charles Murray.  Murray who bills himself as a Scots-Irish Gentile from Iowa disqualifies himself from serious consideration when he closes his amiable but ridiculous article with this sentence.

At this point, I take sancturary in my remaining hypothesis, uniquely parsimonious and happily irrefutable.  The Jews are God’s chosen people.

     Whether Murray was cynically trying to buy the Jews off, chirpily humorous or dead serious is difficult for me to ascertain.  I can only take him at his words.

     Let’s start with IQ tests.  I’m sure that in a general way they are useful for predicting raw mental ability.  Humans being what they are however if there is a way to bring results in line with your hopes and expectations it will be done.

     I took an IQ test in high school.  Just so we understand each other you have to know how to read to take the test.  Prerequisite.  That automatically eliminates  the illiterate who may in fact have high IQa.  Mr. Murray rejects the notion that books and magazines in the home have a bearing on IQ scores.  I beg to differ.  Once again you have to be able to read.  The more experience you have in reading and the more adequate your vocabulary the better and more quickly you can understand a sentence.  Some of those sentences were pretty tricky, testing your reading skills.  Such tests tend to favor the better prepared.  Nothing to do with IQ.

     Further I can remember that there were at least six to twelve questions that were giveaways to those from upper middle class backgrounds.  Those few ‘gift’ questions might easily have added a number of points for those with that certain more acceptable background.  So, as I say in a general way IQ tests are useful but I wouldn’t take them to the bank.

     Knowing how to take tests is essential.  Some kids took each question in order and remained stuck for the entire test period  pondering one question.  I whizzed ahead, got the ones I knew for sure, went back for the rest and anything I didn’t have a clue on just marked a box.  Some twit actually turned me in for answering questions out of order.

     And then, in college I received a test back on which I knew several answers checked wrong were right.  On questioning the teacher it was discovered that her assistant had used the wrong matrix to correct the test.  Might have been a mistake, might have been on purpose.  There are plenty of areas for error.

     Then Murray presents such sloppy evidence that I find it incredible:

     The imbalance continues to increase for still higher IQs.  New York City’s public school system used to administer a pencil and paper IQ test to its entire school population.  In 1954, a psychologist used those test results to identify all 28 children in the New York public school system with measured IQs of 170 or higher.  Of these 28, 24 were Jews.

     Mr. Murray doesn’t identify the psychologist or his or her method.  We don’t know who checked up on him or how the testees were identified as Jews.  Must have been the names because Jews were very reluctant to be identified as Jews in 1954.

     I think I’ve made my point on IQ tests;

      There are social items to consider.  As a member of the goy part of society I can’t help but note that there were a great many of us from the wrong side of the tracks who were denied opportunity regardless of our scores.  While the Jews as an outside minority are as an entire group encouraged to get the best education for competition with the majority fully fifty percent or more of the dominant culture are discouraged from doing so.  I know of cases where parents beat their kids for trying too hard.   Large numbers of kids were pressured out of school in Junior High.  I was arbitrarily assigned to Trade School out of ninth grade against my stated intent.  I had to fight high school administration for four days before I could get admitted to regular high school.  One whole day of those four days were consumed by whether I would be allowed to take the academic curriculum or be forced into the business curriculum.  And that was here in the United States Of America and I am a White Gentile.  Take your crap about Black and Jewish discrimination and put it up your rectum and see if it changes your strut.

     Let us consider the case in Russia.  If discrimination from their ‘betters’ in the US was rife then imagine what it had been for the mass of the native Russian population under the Czars.  The common people were Serfs, that is to say, slaves, no better off and perhaps worse off than the African slaves in the US.  Serfs were bound to the land no less than the Africans.  Over them, a small minority of the population was the Aristocracy who considered the Serfs dumb brutes no less than Africans in the US.  The Serfs were denied any education for hundreds of years. 

     The Jews of Russia, on the contrary, were free men if restricted in their liberties.  While their literacy rate was no where near what Murray imagines any Jew nevertheless could become literate  if he so desired.  Since the Serfs were illiterate, if IQ tests had been available only Jews and aristocrats could have taken them.  Hence what was the average IQ of a Russian?

     Even after 1861 Serfs were not welcome in the universities where they would have rubbed elbows with the Aristos.  Rubbing elbows with Jews didn’t bother the Aristos half as much.  The Jews however being generally if not universally literate did push into the universities.  They applied in such numbers that they would have swamped them as the pool of Jewish literates was probably as large as the Russian even though their population was much smaller.   They were officially limited to !o% but probably 15 to 20& slipped in.

    Let me contest Murray’s claim that Jews are more intelligent because the intellectual demand for being a Jew was so difficult that the dumb Jews became Christian leaving the intelligent Jews behind.  Actually it would have been the other way around.  The less intelligent usually cling to custom while the more intelligent adjust to actual realities.  Thus the more intelligent would tend to think ‘Why am I putting up with this medieval crap.’  and leave thus lowering the general intelligence of Jews.

     When the Revolution blew in in 1917 the Jews were uniquely prepared to take over the majority of administration posts-  that was after 3-4 million geniuses shifted bases to the US.

     Trotsky crowed that Russians who had been denied were so dumb they needed Jews who were more intelligent (read had an opportunity for literacy) as a gift of god.

     Now, the bulk of any national population- German, French, etc.- know only their native tongue.  Local Jews always knew the local tongue plus having their own universal tongue- Yiddish- that all Jews also knew.  You can see how esy it wouldhave been to bamboozle the locals giving the appearance of intelligence while a couple of Jews amidst a group of various nationals would have them at their mercy.

     While Murray rambles about in the upper stratosphere of metaphysical explanations there are more plausible ones here on earth.

     As Honore de Balzac was to remark- great fortunes are based on a great crime.  He was undoubtedly referring to the Rothschilds of whom the saying was definitely true but no less so than the current plunderers of Russia or even, heaven forbid, Goldman Sachs and their merry band of Wall Street criminals.  You don’t need that much intelligence to be a crook and where it’s needed, in Timothy Geithner’s job, for instance, that old extra Jewish intelligence gene seems to be sadly lacking.

     Our little old cornfed scholar from Ioway should have eaten something more nutritious.  I thought there was something fishy looking about the Bell Curve so I neither read nor bought it.  Now I know why.  If he can say with a straight face that he believes Jews are more intelligent because god chose them for his people then probably his real reason for believing Africans are dumb is because god cursed them and made them black.  You don’t need eight hundred pages or so for that.

     Say, didn’t Noel Ignatiev graduate from Harvard too?  I’m beginning to wonder about that school.

Divided Loyalties- Divided Minds

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/news-and-politics/18983/the-pulse-taker/

        While Jews were denying that AIPAC even existed a new Jewish-Israeli pressure group was being formed- J Street.    J for Jews one supposes.  The article above from Tablet Ezine makes some interesting disclosures.

     Number one there seems to be no way that J Street can deny being an Israeli lobby…although….  Tablet proudly announces they are such.

     A key member, Jim Gerstein by name, is described as a native Chicagoan but seems to commute back and forth to Israel with the ease of from his neighborhood to the Loop downtown.  Gerstein doesn’t even claim to be a loyal American.  His concern is to package his Jewish constituency to look like acceptable Duals.

     His…role at J Street…has been to push the group to think of its core constituency…Jewish voters…as Democrats who care about Israel, rather than as “Israeli voters” who tend to be Democrats.

     This seems to be a strategy to shift the balance of the Dual citizenship more toward the fulcrum of blurring the identity making it easier to pull the wool over the eyes of White Americans much as Communists do by calling themselves Liberals or Democrats.

     Not so bad.  Appearing as much American as Jewish or Israeli leaves them more vulnerable to persuasion or criticism.  While it is hard for a White to criticize a Jew and risk being defamed as an anti-Semite, as an ‘American’ who happens to love Biblical Hebrews much as do fundamentalist Christians, the Jew can then be persuaded or criticized as an American.  He goes naked as were, much as the cop without his gun.

     So maybe it is time for Jews to announce their ‘primary’ loyalty.  Are they primarily Americans or are they primarily Israelis?

     Gerstein seems to have trouble making up his mind regardless of what he says since he seems to be a national type of guy commuting between two shores.  Shall he go or shall he stay?  Is he one of us or one of them?  If us we have a few pertinent questions to put to him; if one them he can go.

Left, Right And Haters

by

R.E. Prindle

     We read with amusement that Pelosi, Reid et al., The United Morons Of America, intend to pass legislation barring  ’haters’ from the serving in the military.  That’s rich.

     When Congress wanted to pass a law back in the fifties outlawing Communism the Reds scotched the idea.  McCarthyism.  Woo woo.  Now the master hypocrites want to pass laws outlawing the Right.  Get out.

     My only real regret is that this law wasn’t in effect in the fifties when I served.  Of course, in those distant happy untroubled days they coerced you into joining by the draft.  They didn’t care what you thought. Once in you were in for the duration, like it or not.  You could have hated all mankind including Lenin and Karl Marx and it wouldn’t have fazed them.

     In today’s Liberal paradise, get this:

The House passed plan calls for the immediate discharge of anyone associated with a hate group.

     As evidence of association with a hate group the House accepts emails or posting on line.  Hallelujah, Jesus Christ, Moses in the Bullrushes.    Good g-d almighty.  Not only would I have been gone in a flash, gone?, hell I would have been 4F and they would never have seen me.  Not only me but 95% of the Army and Navy.  Are you kidding?  The ranks would have been depleted.  And How!

     Who do Pelosi, Reid et al. think they’re going to be recruiting?  Hello Central, please connect them to reality.  The US will no longer have an Army.  I’d be out of Afghanistan in a trice.  Let me use that computer, sir, I have to post on line.  With no Army to back the tarts up a revolution of the right is incontestable.  With no ring of steel around the Red bastards they’re as good as gone.

     On with it, into the streets with the bastards.  Take back the government.  Down with the Commies.