Seriously, I imagine you read the Kun essay and then visited my profile.

That’s a good picture, I don’t know where you get this old man stuff, but as they say about the eye of the beholder.

Now, Mad Jill, the ad hominem is never an effective argument. Anywhere I fail in my factual approach is open to criticism or condemnation. I got everything right. There are no errors there. Reality is a tough task master and many can’t face it. I don’t criticize you because you can’t or don’t want to but as I say, the ad hominem is not an argument.

The very best to you, come back when you’ve got valid criticism.