Hi.
I use this blog to deal with current issues. I am interested in evolution and the politics of species and 
races. I have thought about these problems more than somewhat and have come to conclusions that are not dealt with in the same way in the media.
I like to think I’m ahead of the curve anyway. I also like conspiracy theory which I find very entertaining. Some conspiracy stuff is off the wall while other stuff has some real basis in fact if seemingly off the wall. You have to do a lot of reading.
The evolutionary theory fits into p0litical conspiracy theory on the basis of species and race. In order to understand what is happening now one must begin with the period from Louis XV to the present which inevitably involves one in the Illuminatti. After a two or three decades of wondering over the issue I have come to the understanding that Illuminism is the basis of the present discord. I recommend a thorough study of the French and Russian Revolutions which will bring you up to the current Racial Revolution with all its implications.
I have two other blogs. reprindle.wordpress.com I use to post my fiction. idynamo.wordpress.com I use to post my essays, reviews and non-fiction much of which gives a background for my opinions here. I would recommend reading the Something Of Value series. At the very least the series is entertaining.
I have a large number of essays on Edgar Rice Burroughs located at http://erbzine.com that you might enjoy.
Things are not what they may seem, it pays to look behind the curtain.
A little touch of vanity: I’ve published my first novel at iUniverse: The Sonderman Constellation. It’s available on the net book retailing sites like amazon, Barnes & Noble, abebooks and whatever for 14.95. If you want to review it I have it posted on my reprindle.wordpress.com blog. Check it out.
3 Comments
Check my about at reprindle.wordpress.com or the Ron E. Prindle Biblio profile at erbzine.com
You are one sick old man festering in Jew hatred. Wow.
I don’t know how you derived your opinion from my profile, but, some people read with a crystal ball I suppose.
Seriously, I imagine you read the Kun essay and then visited my profile.
That’s a good picture, I don’t know where you get this old man stuff, but as they say about the eye of the beholder.
Now, Mad Jill, the ad hominem is never an effective argument. Anywhere I fail in my factual approach is open to criticism or condemnation. I got everything right. There are no errors there. Reality is a tough task master and many can’t face it. I don’t criticize you because you can’t or don’t want to but as I say, the ad hominem is not an argument.
The very best to you, come back when you’ve got valid criticism.