Contemporary Notes

Barry Dunham-Obama, Black Liberation Theology And The Rev. James David Manning

by

R.E. Prindle

     Just to corroborate what I’ve been saying check out this video from the Black Liberation Theologist the Rev. James David Manning.

http://youtube.com/user/ATLAHWorldwide

The link was working when I tried it.

Multi-Culturalism, Unity And Divisiveness

by

R.E. Prindle

     If you haven’t got it figured out yet multi-culturalism is a thing of the past.  The Reds have abandoned the concept.  They are now reverting to the old Party line of Unity and Divisiveness.  There is now only one people and one point of view.  The Reds feel they have won the war and can now more or less come out into the open.  They may have won the war with the rest being mopping up operations,

     As Obama stands for Unity any vote for another candidate is evilly promoting ‘divisiveness’ or in other words you are not aboard the Red bus on the Red Line.

     It should come as no surprise that Obama is a Red on the Red Line.  The same terminology he is employing against ‘divisiveness’ is also being flollowed in England and undoubtedly on the Continent.

     In the recent English elections the British National Party that rejects the Red/Communist line obtained a very fine showing at the polls.  They returned more than double the representatives than they had before.  This under the most extreme vilification and hindrance possible.

     The mere differing opinion on the course England should folow has been branded as ‘peddling hate and division.’

     One might ask division from what?  Do the Reds actually imagine there is ‘unity’ in the warring factions of society?  I find that hard to believe even of Reds.  No, what division means is that the Party line is threatened.  As with the various churches divisiveness is merely another term to describe heretics, unbeilievers, indidels, anti-Semites, racists etc, etc.  any term that brands a dissenter as evil, disruptive, insane, criminal.

     We have been toyed with enough.  We have been over patient with these people for the last sixty years.  It is absolutely necessary to hoot or jeer anyone, anytime, anywhere who mentions ‘unity’ or ‘divisiveness’.  These terms and the notions behind them must be derided, scorned and one’s ‘divisiveness’ must be made apparent.

     If you stand for the evil, criminal intent behind the terms ‘Unity’ and ‘Divisiveness’  you will have no complaints when all your rights are taken away from you and you are unified with the Red will.

     Slaves are made not born.

Barry Dunham Obama, Reconstruction And The San Domingo Moment

by

R.E. Prindle

     At the beginning of the nineteenth century the Black slaves of the French colony of San Domingo, now Haiti, revolted.  Of the twenty thousand White people among a horde of half a million Blacks all the White males were exterminated while the White females were made sex slaves.

     This event did not happen on another planet but was duly noted in the United States Of America, especially the slave holding Southern states.  This event was known as the San Domingo Moment.  It set the nerves of the South on edge for the sixty years leading up to the Civil War.

     At the end of the war with the San Domingo Moment before their memories the disarmed and exhausted Whites faced an armed Black population.

     Unlike Haiti where the Whites were outnumbered 10 to 1, the races were more or less equal in number in the South while the White millions of the North stood between the Blacks and any reptition of the San Domingo Moment.

     Thus in the Reconstruction bttle the Whites regained supremacy while instituting the Jim Crow era to control the Blacks.  Was this necessary?  Undoubtedly.

     The San Domingo moment while forgotten today was not averted merely put off to a later date.  W.E.B. Du Bois writing in 1935 warned that the Moment was fast approaching.

     Since 1935 the New Abolitionist Party has been formed consisting of Liberal Whites and Blacks whose avowed goal is the genocide of Whites.

     Unless I’m very mistaken the election of Barry will signalize the return of the San Domingo Moment.  ‘Old times dar am not forgotten.’  In anticipation of the Moment Black crimes against Whites today are increasing in their frequency and audacity.  As there is no retaliation for them allowed, indeed more and more absurd laws are passed favoring Blacks, once can only expect such crimes to increase.

      Once a Black President is inaugurated there will be no holding Blacks back.  The future lies ahead- use it or lose it.

Cut Bait Or Fish

by

R.E. Prindle

Chinese history has become the story of average citizens.  But there are risks when a nation depends on the individual dreams of 1.3 billion people rather than a coherent political system with clear rule of law.

National Geographic- May 2008

     This quote was highlighted in the article in National Geographic with th term ‘individual dreams’  contrasted in red.  The editors who selected that passage must also be Red rendering the Geogrpahic a mouthpiece for the Revolution.

     The quote is interesting.  Average citizens the author thinks have replaced the Communist automaton.  As average citizens with individual dreams they are not to be trusted.  The hard work of Chairman Mao, not so average one assumes, and the Cultural Revolution appears to have come, or is being, undone.  Rather than the seried ranks of automatons marching in praise of the Communist Revolution under flying red banners we have the horrifying spectacle of 1.3 billion people with individual dreams.  Makes you want to scream in horror doesn’t it? 

     The tyranny of Mao with its callous disregard of the fate of 1.3 billion people living under a coherent politcal system  with, and get this,   a clear rule of law.  Clear according to whom and what sort of laws comprise the LAW?  Are we speaking of the cadres of the Red Guard coursing through the streets smashing and burning?  Are we speaking of dissenters being brought within the rule of law by the most horrific unlawful punishments.  Well, formerly unlawful but now by fiat a clear rule of law.  You really know where you stand.

     Is this a vision of a coherent political system under Barry Dunham Obama where all without the clear rule of law of the Negro Revolution will be mercilessly badgered  until all pride is gone and they submit crushed by the clear rule of law.

     Yea, verily, as Pastor Wright might say, this is the vision of Obama’s Liberal Red handlers.  This is the Ivy League vision of the Worker’s Racial Paradise.  New Abolitionism in action.  The picture of a wholly Black populace marching in unison singing the Internationale under the red flag.  The unfinished revolution of Reconstruction completed.

     Once again the Reds tip their hand for anyone who wants to peek at it.  Read the quote over again two or three times.  Think of the attitude and assumptions behind it.  Project the results unto American society, your society, in the aftermath of a Barry victory.  Is this the sunny homeland you want for yourself and your children?  Well, that’s what you’re going to get unless you do a little more than say no.  The past that you loved is behind you.  That has been lost forever.  That dream has disappeared.  The future looms forbidding before you.  Cut bait or fish.

Barry Dunham Obama, Unity And Divisiveness

by

R.E. Prindle

     Words.  Words and meanings.  Unity has a nice positive sound while Divisiveness has a mean nasty sound.  But, what if in the way the two words are deployed as implements of war Unity becames mean and nasty and Divisiveness becomes positive?

     How are the two words used in the Red lexicon?

     Historically Unity is used to disarm Red opponents and Divisive is used to condemn them.  Something like calling opponents anti-Semites.

     To use the most famous case- that of the Chinese Nationalists of Chiang Kai Chek and the Communists of Mao Tse Tung, as then known.

     Employing Unity in a positive sense US Reds demanded that the Nationalists take the Communists in to ‘unify’ China.  As everyone knows Communists do not combine with any others than Communists.  Thus once in, the intolerant Communists worked relentlessly to frustrate the goodwill of the Nationalists who then became Divisives and hence evil people.  China went Communist. The Nationalists were killed.  Hence China had unity.

     Leopards do not change their spots nor apparently do Reds change their methods.  Barry’s notions of ‘change’  are merely time worn Communist tactics. 

     Barry says he wants to ‘unify’ the country while he deplores ‘divisive’ people who deplore what he means by the world ‘unity.’  While apparently Red and led around by Reds Barry in this instance has substituted race for politics.  He claims he is going to ‘unify’ Blacks and Whites.

     How can he actually do this?  Only by amalgamating the two races or, actually, species.  Only by raising up the Black Folk en masse by installing them in jobs requiring skill, talent and ability while removing the competent Whites.

     Thus just as in Reconstruction South Carolina a twenty year old illiterate ex-slave was made head of the Greek Department of the University one imagines that a crack dealer from the streets of Chicago wil be made the head of GE.  Don’t laugh, this is already happening in South Africa.

     This feat of legerdemain will be called Unity.  To object will be called Divisive.  What will happen to the Divisives?  The same thing that happened to the Kulaks in Communist Russia.  The same thing that happened to Rightists in China and going back to the beginning in the French Revolution the same thing that happened to the royalists in La Vendee.

     Yes, it can happen here.  It is going to happen here unless you stop it.  If you don’t have what it takes to put an end to these Red lunatics and their fantasies don’t ever say:  No one could possibly have known it would turn out like this.  You do know; I’m telling you now.

Mrs. Elizabeth Dilling, Israeli Terrorists and Kevin MacDonald

by

R.E. Prindle

     Elizabeth Dilling went to Russia in 1931.

     They told her there that the Communist World Revolution would first continue on to China and then The United States.  She returned home to write her monumental The Red Network first published in1934 going through multiple printings and editions even though self-published by Mrs. Dilling.  She followed The Red Network with the incredible The Roosevelt Red Record And Its Background a scant two years after FDR’s election.

     Both exposes were so devastingly accurate that Mrs. Dilling was immediately denounced as a Fascst.  As usual with the proto-Israeli-Communists as Mrs. Diling’s facts could not be refuted the usual slanderous ad hominem attacks were undertaken.  Don’t invite Mrs. Dilling to dinner.  No more party invitations.

     She was grouped with the anti-Communist leaders being brought to trial in 1944 for being so vocal at the instance of the proto-Israelis and the connivance of the Roosevelt Administration.  Fortunately the Americanist forces were strong enough to bury the trial and nothing came of it although these Israel-Communist advocates of ‘Free Speech’  would have sent Mrs. Dilling to prison on the basis of her 1934 expose of their machinations.  The Red Network.

     In 1948 the State of Israel was founded giving the Israelis a secure base of operations.  A reign of terror then began in the United States as Israeli citizens based in the United States either used existing terrorist organizations such as the ADL and AJC or set up new ones such as the SPLC.

     The SPLC- Southern Poverty Law Conference- was given the dirty, less dignified jobs while the ADL and AJC attempted to function among the haut ton.

     It was left to the SPLC to conduct the letter writing and whisper slander campaigns.  As with Mrs. Dilling a current object of attack, Professor Kevin MacDonald of the California State University At Long Beach has been too astute a scholar to be attacked on the results of his research so the campaign of personal vilification has been begun by SPLC denuciations of Prof. MacDonald to faculty and administration while enlisting student agitators in departments like History to object to Professor MacDonald’s presence on campus.

     One can’t expect undergraduates to be very well informed on anything but sex and ‘Diversity’ these days and indeed their open letter denouncing Prof. MacDonald while endorsing ‘free speech’  had nothing to say of substance.

     The long Israeli-Amnerican war dating bact to at least Mrs. Dilling in 1931 goes on.  As the Soviets prophesied to Mrs. Dilling China was next.  The battle is raging in the United States  with battle lines clearly drawn.  It is to be hoped that the CSULB and the California State University system will recognize this skirmish for what it is and send the Israeli terrorists of the SPLC packing.

     The History Club is correct, Free Speech is the issue.  Not their version of free speech but Free Speech.

The Frankfurt School, Kevin MacDonald And The SPLC

by

R.E. Prindle

      It would appear that we are in the midst of one of those cross-cultural conflicts in this Multi-Cultural Wonderland of ours.  There is a Professor in the Psychology Department of California State University At Long Beach by the name of Kevin MacDonald.  Professor MacDonald wrote a book titled The Culture Of Critique in which he discussed the Frankfurt School also known in the US as The New School For Social Research.

     The Frankfurt School has a long history in the various University systems of California.  As the name Frankfurt indicates the School is of European origin.  Fleeing Hitler in the thirties the members settled in the United States.  Most of them returned to Europe after the war but one who was influential in the US, Herbert Marcuse, elected to stay behind taking a position with the University Of California, San Diego.  From there he developed a sort of cult in the California University systems.  Prominent among the cult members are Theodore Roscak, author of The Making Of A Counter Culture and Greil Marcus, author of Lipstick Traces.

     Roscak wrote his book while employed as a Prof. at Cal State College At Hayward, since renamed Cal State University, East Bay.  Marcus is associated in some way with UC Berkeley while trotting around the country as a representative of Critical Theory and the Situationist International.

     While the Frankfurt School has been happy to use the California University systems to propagate their vision of the ‘Critical Theory’ of the Frankfurt School they now wish to deny Prof. MacDonald the use of his critical faculties because his researches into Critical Theory differ from theirs.  They have characterized his researches as ‘anti-Semitic’ in violation of live and let live Multi-Cultural rules.  They have called in the Southern Poverty Legal Center to denounce Prof. MacDonald as a threat to society and call for the dismissal of this tenured Professor from his Professorship.  Oh, they are all for academic freedom, don’t get them wrong, but sometimes too much freedom can be dangerous.  Rather than let the truth set them free they seem to prefer to wallow in ignorance.

     As you may know the SPLC is a terrorist organization founded by a failed lawyer, Morris Dees.  While a failure as a lawyer Mr. Dees has become a roaring success as a fund raiser currently boasting of an SPLC bank account approaching two hundred million dollars on its way, one supposes, to a billion or more.  At a billion the fund becomes self-perpetuating for ever.

     Mr. Dees husbands the SPLC money carefully taking on no expensive cases.  He prefers slanderous letter writing campaigns on the cheap such as that against Prof. MacDonald.

     Mr. Dees has apparently set himself up as judge of what is acceptable scholarship and what is not.  As he is a failed lawyer I see no evidence of his having obtained success as a scholar.  He should probably confine his efforts to fund raising at which he’s really good.

     The issue of Critical Theory/Frankfurt School/New School For Social Research is best left to those competent to deal with it such as Mr. Marcus, Mr. Roscak, Mr. MacDonald and, if I may immodestly add, myself.

     One would hope that Professor MacDonald’s Psychology Department, his University and his University system would disdain the interference of this ignorant money grubbing failed lawyer, Morris Dees, and his silly Southern Poverty Legal Center.  One would hope Mr. Dees would strive for some self-respect and failing that leave intellectual matters to those with intellects.

 Capitalism, Communism And The International Money Trust

by

R.E. Prindle

     …the United States, reenforced by the increased political power of the South based on disfranchisement of black voters, took its place to reenforce the capitaliatic dictatorship of the United States, which became the most powerful in the world, and which backed the new industrial imperialism and degraded colored labor the world over.

     This meant a tremendous change in the whole intellectual and spiritual development of civilization in the South and in the United States because of the predominant political power of the South, built on disfranchised labor.  The United States was turned into a reactionary force.  It became the cornerstone of that new imperialism which is subjecting the labor or yellow, brown and black peoples to the dictation of capitalism organized on a world basis; and it has not only brought nearer the revolution by which the power of capitalism is to be challenged, but also it is transforming the fight to the sinister aspect of a fight on racial lines embittered by awful memories.

W.E.B Du Bois:  Black Reconstruction In America 1860-1880.  Free Press paperback edition, pp. 630-31

     Du Bois gives a nice little analysis there that he was probably only allowed to publish because he was Black.  His race and political background distorts his vision somewhat preventing  him from going far enough while at the same time hinting at current developments.

     While Capitalism and Communism may be antagonistic economic and political systems they are merely pawns on the board of the International Money Trust.  The Money Trust arose out of the ashes of the Civil War when truly international operations began to become possible.

     As noted before the international economic system of the Cotton Empire was dependent on slave labor in the South.  Slave labor is the cheapest form of labor possible, bar none.  According to the Iron Law Of Wages slaves can be compelled to accept the lowest possible wage, which is mere subsistence.  In order to replace this cheap labor as Du Bois notes:  (The IMT) ‘…is the cornerstone of that new imperialism which is subjecting the labor of yellow, brown and black peoples to the dictation of (the IMT) organized on a world basis.’

     Yes, that is the current situation although Du Bois can’t see that the IMT is colorblind.  It is now reducing the White world to the same level as the yellow, brown and black.

     The only thing in the world important to the IMT is money.  All power comes from the monetary printing presses.  Thus the IMT rises above and governs the more parochial systems of Capitalism and Communism.  Whether one or another all political and economic systems require a medium of exchange- by any other name, money.  Who controls money controls the world.  Thus the IMT always had an entree to and a foot in the door of any system that could be devised.  The IMT was always involved with both Capitalism and Communism.  Thus when that fool Nixon freed China from sanctions the IMT moved right in and turned Communist China with its conditioned slave base into a money making behemoth.  Communism or Capitalism makes no difference to the Money Trust.  They now rule both systems.

     Nevertheless, as Du Bois points out, as the original Money Trust was White, White people were blamed, the United States especially, for the then exploitation  of yellow, black and brown labor.  That Whites were also being exploited as brutally, witness Holly Grove, or more brutally, witness the Ludlow Massacre, than coloreds is either unnoticed by Du Bois or irrelevant to him, he not being color blind.  As he notes the Money Trust was ‘transforming the fight to the sinister aspect of a fight on racial lines embittered by awful memories.’

      That harvest is now coming due.  Du Bois is not ineterested in all the ramifications of the struggle of species for survival in an overcrowded world but I find his analysis as far as he goes, very good.

     The issue then is to identify the members of the IMT, whether Bilderbergers or whatever, and hold them individually accountable.  They first looted the US Savings and Loan industry and they are now taking the actual houses out from under the very depositors in the Savings and Loans.  This is going too far.  This is short sighted and stupid.  But, if is my belief that they want a corner on all the money in the world.  Financial institutions were set up for the fall so that now dozens world wide are being consolidated into fewer units.

     We were once advised to follow the money.  OK, so where’s the money?

Barry Dunham Obama Democracy And The Totalitarian State

by

R.E. Prindle

     One cannot doubt that there is a differnce between the psychology of Whites and Blacks.  There is no chance that Blacks perceive reality in the same manner as Whites.  In point of fact their realities are different.  This is true on the social, historical and evolutionary levels.  Words and concepts have different meanings.  Change is a very emotionally charged word.

     W.E.B. Du Bois in his Reconstruction In America 1860-1880  page 383, Free Press paperback edition makes this comment applicable to Barry’s political programme that merits careful reading and a little thought:

     It is…one’s moral duty to see that every human being to the extent of his capacity, escapes ignorance, poverty and crime.  With this high ideal held unswervingly in view, monarchy, oligarchy and dictatorship may rule;  but the end will be the rule of All, if mayhap All or Most qualify.  The only unforgiveable sin is dictatorship for the benefit of Fools, Voluptuaries, gilded Satraps, Prositutes and Idiots.

     Mr. Du Bois, who was a Communist, was writing in 1935 when dictatorships were istablished in Italy, Germany and Russia and close to that in the United States.  It is interesting that he has no objection to that form of government.  He perhaps disqualifies the Italian as a ‘gilded Satrap’ and the German as perhaps that of Idiots, while approving the Communists for following their ‘moral duty.’

     He has no objection to monarchy which the American Revolution and the Revolution in general abhorred or oligarchy which was the system that enslaved his people but then the Planters were undoubtedly Voluptuaries.  But, maybe, the situation could be reversed.

     He doesn’t mention Democracy in his list of governments for perhaps obvious reasons as more force is required to achieve his goals than Democracy permits.

     He appears to favor a merit system as he qualifies access to full citizenship on the basis of one’s abiity to ‘escape’ ignorance, povery and crime.  Ignorance in Mr. Du Bois’ vocabulary means, I think, no prejudice or aversion toward Black Folk.  This would undoubtedly disqualify a fairly large percentage of White people from full citizenship who I assume would be classed as Fools.

     What does it mean then that ‘It is (every) one’s duty to see that every human being…escapes ignorance.’  Schooling for Blacks is a major concern for Du Bois so the phrase has that meaning but is qualified by ‘to the extent of his capacity.’  Thus we are back to a seeming merit system.  As a White person might read that Blacks might be less educable and destined to less pretigious jobs.  Indeed the law even recognizes this condition by promoting Affirmative Action which is a sort of handicap system for Blacks.  But what happens if any Black is incapable of ‘escaping’ ignorance for Du Bois says of the various types of totalitarian governments that their rule must be to benefit All and the end will be the rule of All.  That sounds like sexual amalgamation to me. 

     The rule of All might mean in the Communist sense that the State will whither away.  I don’t really know what it means; it is a vague notion.

     But obviously the intent is that All will be raised or reduced to the same level and be equal whether they have the capacity or not.

      And then as racial preferences are part of ‘ignorance’ what is to become of White people who cannot ‘escape’ their ignorance.  Poverty and crime I don’t want to touch.

     Barry says we can talk about this pressing problem of race now.  I urge him to do it.  I urge him to explain passages such as the above.  I urge him to let us know what his understanding of Black Liberation Theology is.  How is this particular religious point of view going to affect his actions?  Enough of this shilly-shallying about his grandmother being a bigot.  We want to know.  James Watson- about him too.

Barry Dunham-Obama, The Consitution, Black Liberation Theology And W.E.B Du Bois

by

R.E. Prindle

     One might examine Barry, Black Liberation Theology and the Constitution in the light of W.E.B. Du Bois’ Black Reconstruction In America 1860-1880.  I suspect all four are closely related.

     Du Bois offers many insights into current Black psychology.

     For instance on page 382 of the current Free Press paperback edition he says:

     The South was in the midst of industrial, civil and political anarchy.  Crime, force and murder, disorganized and wandering laborers, unorganized industry, were widely in evidence.  The United States as a sovereign nation could declare the Southern states, where rebellion had occurred, unorganized territory, and could rule them by civil government, backed by Federal police.

     Unorganized territory and Federal police.  Keep those conceptions in mind for after Barry’s election.

     By those who regarded the Constitution as a fetich, this might be pronounced sacriligious, but to ordinary human beings it was by far the safest and sanest thing that the nation could have done, and it would have saved the United States and the whole world untold injury, retrogression and world war.

     Well, goddamn America!  What a leap of imagination.  Why would it have been safest and sanest?  How would it have saved the United States and the whole world untold injury, retrogression and world war?Translate the above into Black Liberation Theology, Pastor Wright’s sermons and an attentive Barry Dunham in the audience trying to prove his Blackness and I think we’re getting closer to Barry’s hidden agenda that he is so reluctant to speak about.  In other words, Change We Can Believe in.   Once again, who is ‘We’ Black Man?

     One may assume that Du Bois and Dunham are one.  Thus in order to achieve their goals Blacks are willing to set aside the Constitution as ‘ordinary human beings’ while Constitutuonal ‘fetichists’ who are obviously sub-human, oppose them.

     They wish to set aside the Constitution to impose, essentially, martial law that suspends laws and rights to obtain their ‘ordinary human’ desires that will benefit only themselves.

     Thus in this condition of marial law the Blacks are placed above both the law and Whites by the Federal police.  It is clear that what Dunham and BLT are aiming at is the old Planter aristocracy with themselves as the Aristocrats and Whites as slaves.

     How can one reasonably invoke martial law?  Well, ‘crime, force and murder, disorganized and wandering laborers etc.’.  In other words create or claim a state of ‘anarchy.’

     Anyone who has read the Protocols should recognize the above methods.

     On the head of the Protocols now known as the Protocols Of The Learned Elders Of Zion they should have the title changed and be reissued as the Protocols of Revolution.  It matters little whether they are attributed to the Jews so long as the methods are studied and countered.  What the Protocols of Revolution advocate is what is happening.

     That said what Barry actually means by the words he uses should be interpreted in the light of Black Liberation Theology and Du Bois’ Black Reconstruction In America.  I urge you to read it.  I will be coming back to it frequently to explain the present.