Bad Day At Auschwitz

 

Bad Day At Auschwitz

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/arts-and-culture/music/9994/letter-from-krakow/

 

     One must read with scepticism.  The movie Wag The Dog should be a constant reminder of how news and opinion are manipulated to reflect the needs and prejudices of the manipulators.  Nothing can be taken at face value.

     Leaders in this manner of manipulation seem to be the writers of Tablet Magazine.  I have already mentioned Wesley Yang and now comes a Roger Bennett to pursue the same course.  He speaks of a Jewish music festival in Krakow, Poland, the heart of the Jewish Disneyland- Holocaustland.  Mr. Bennett says:

     Krakow is a town where the Holocaust is everywhere- thanks to a battery of brightly colored wagons, little bigger than golf carts, that litter the streets, energetically competing to lure visitors onto a series of niche tours they market via menus emblazoned on their sides.  Trips to Auschwitz, ‘Kazimeirz Ghetto,” and “Schindler’s Factory”…

     Thus the unwary are lured to the crown jewel of Holocaustland, the Auschwitz Extermination Camp in ‘gaily colored carts.’  In this festive manner unwary tourists are lured to the most depressing spot on earth sometimes with disastrous results to their psychology.  God only knows what horrific Disney like special effects the promoters have devised, imaginary heaps of dead bodies with bulldozers moving them toward mass graves  or even worse.  Mr. Bennett records one such devastated psyche.

     One such person while attending the first night of the music festival disrupted the emcee in mid performance continuing to heckle him until in desperation the MC asked him ‘to come up  here and tell us what kind of bad day you have had that gives you the right to be Mr. Rude and bring us all down like that.”

      Staggering to the stage he blurted into the microphone:  I have had a bad day…because…I went to Auschwitz.  Apparently the depressing experience had unhinged the poor man’s mind.  Too tender, perhaps.

     This raises the question of whether it is right for the Jews to commercialize this great disaster of world history by turning it into a Disney like amusement park.  A grim one at that.  Lord knows we all love a good disaster; disaster films are some of the most popular cult films around, people watch the WTC bombing over and over but Great God Almighty isn’t some suffering sacred?

     Are the Jews so light minded that they turn their own great national disaster into coin?  One would hope that these misguided souls would discontinue Holocaustland in honor of the dear departed fallen.

     Making money from the suffering of their own people, indeed!  What barbarism!!!

Leiber And Stoller, Wesley Yang, And Their Magic Moment

 

Leiber And Stoller, Wesley Yang,

And ‘Their Magic Moment’

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/arts-and-culture/music/8898/their-magic-moment/

 

     To quote Wesley Yang:  (my italics wherever they appear)

     (Rock and Roll) was the instrument of a revolution in bourgeois manners and mores.  What other country would dress its privileged children in the garb of its sharecroppers, (read, Negroes) and coal miners, or school them, three minutes at a time in the sexual mores of the ghetto…

     Let us examine this quote in the light of Mr. Yang’s next statement.

     You would need people eager to embrace the new (read divisive) able to serve as intermediaries linking black and white, sensitive enough to hear joy where others heard only sqalor, clever enough to hear opportunity where others heard only noise, alive to the mordant humor of the ghetto, heedless of existing prejudices (think Lenny Bruce) and conventions…you needed Jews.

     An interesting description of Judaism and its goals.  As I have said rock and roll would have evolved without Jews but in different directions.  Jews weren’t needed for anything but as Mr. Yang candidly confesses, rock and roll in the hands of the Jews was an instrument of social revolution.  As he says Jews wielded that instrument to further their own interests at the expense of everyone else.  Toward what end did Jews use their intrument?  Mr. Yang answers, to destroy bourgeois manners and mores.  Here bourgeois is a code word for White.   How did the Jews attack White manners and mores?  By linking up with the ghetto morals of Blacks in three minute barrages undermining White sexual mores to be replaced by (it is implied) destructive and debased Negro and Jewish mores.  Mr. Yang makes it plain.

     Let us remember that Negroes wrote few of the lyrics to their songs. The content of the lyrics was provided by Jews such as Leiber and Stoller, Doc Pomus, Goffin and King and numerous others.

     So, as Mr. Yang says, Jews were those people ‘who could operate at the bloody crossroads where commerce, art and social change were converging.’  That is, where Jews were directing them.  One has only to think of the career of the despicable Lenny Bruce to see how true Mr. Yang’s perception of  events is.

     It is even more remarkable that Jews are now prepared to confess how they managed the corruption of American society.  Perhaps they think the job is done and they are the victors.  But there you have it from Wesley Yang and the editors of Tablet Magazine.

 

 

Elvis Presley, Yang, Clang And Rock And Roll

 

Elvis Presley,

Yang, Clang

And Rock And Roll

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/arts-and-culture/music/8898/their-magic-moment/

 

     Mr. Yang in his above referenced article asks a very pertinent question.  He asks

     It was the early 1950s and America was changing.  Who would serve as the vanguard of this change?

     Put simplistically as the change was occurring on several levels.  On one, WWII had stopped the old ways in their tracks.  All was now passe as the upcoming generation sought its way through the turmoil toward a vision of itself.  On another level the Jewish/Negro revolution shifted into high gear.  Permanent warfare became the norm with a huge standing military force as the Free World confronted the Red Menace.

     The question as Mr. Yang proposes it is who would direct traffic into the new millennium?  He centers his argument on the cultural area of recorded music.  His interpretation of the change was that only Jews could manage this difficult task.  Indeed, in answer to his own question he states explicitly:  You needed Jews.

     Merely because the Jews hi-jacked the future isn’t to say they were needed.  Mr. Yang and his editors may disagree but the Jews weren’t necessary at all.  One can imagine several successful scenarios without them.  Most likely more successful than that provided by the Jews.  After all there are quite a few critics unhappy with the solution provided by the Jews myself included.  Prior to Jewish intervention pornography was an illegal clandestine enterprise, today it is the centerpiece of our lives.  Pornography is a reflection of mental disease.  Need I say more.

     The musical vehicle for the future was, as Mr. Yang correctly says, Rock and Roll.  But did Rock and Roll have to develop in precisely the way it did?  As Mr. Yang points out the Negro element of popular music gradually rose into cultural dominance.  Was that inevitable or was that directed by a small group of people for their own purposes.  Mr. Yang answers that question, he says:  You needed Jews.

      Indeed the history of Black music and musicians is their exploitation by Jews.  Negro shouts and hollers would have gone nowhere without Jews like Leiber and Stoller to smooth out Negro inflections and provide words that sounded intelligent enough to connect with a White audience.  Although Leiber and Stoller were so Black in outlook that Big Mama Thornton’s version of their shouter, Hound Dog, made to to R&B charts, which is to say nowhere- sold six records and disappeared, only when it was taken over by the premier White musician, Elvis Presley, and given new lyrics, the song became a No. 1 hit.  Not that the old folks were happy about that.  It was just a hillbilly novelty tune like Slow Poke in Elvis’ hands but that seemed to escape the wardens of popular culture.

    
So, who’s the vanguard here- Negroes, Jews, or Elvis Presley?  I would think Elvis, wouldn’t you?  The Blacks and Jews needed Elvis more than he needed them.  I hope I won’t be thought blasphemous but I always thought those two stellar Leiber and Stoller songs, Hound Dog and Jail House Rock among the worst songs ever written and you can throw in I Want To Be Free too.  I rather imagine Freddie Bell and his Bell Boys picked up the song for its ridiculous and comedic qualities.  Must have put the Vegas oldtimers in stitches.

     Would there have been an Elvis Presley without Jews?  Is that even a legitimate question?  Presley got where he was before Jews even knew he was there.  I would post the question to Mr. Yang:  Did we really need Jews?  And if so, for what?

 

Barry Obama, Disinformation, Misinformation And Dissemination

 

Barry Obama

Disinformation, Misinformation And Dissenmination

by

R.E. Prindle

     I’ve mentioned the movie Wag The Dog before.  Over the Fourth Of July I saw an ad on TV that underlined the movie’s importance.

     Wag The Dog  is, of course, a manual on the method of disinformation, misinformation and now the dissemination of information.  The movie should not only be watched but studied.  You can pick up a copy for as low as 5.99.

     Someone who apparently has studied the movie, profiting greatly, is the Great Black Hope himself.  The ad in question was played repeatedly during the Red Sox/Mariners game so the Hope is aiming for the heartland.  Watch Wag The Dog not for its entertainment value, which is considerable, but for its exposition of method.   The method is plainly laid out.  Learn from it.

     The ad in question was for Miller’s Beer.  All the people in it except for the Black protagonist are White.  In this day and age that many Whites and no coloreds should alert you that something is up.  This is propaganda, folks.  Now, the scene is a race course.  You have the box seats and the bleachers.  Anything falling into place yet?

     The opening scene is they’re off.  In other words, the race is on.  The efete White elite are gathered in the boxes amidst luxury and plenty- plenty of Miller’s Beer.  As an ad this implies that the rich know quality and that is Miller’s Beer.  A burly Negro full of energy, confidence and chutzpah barges into the gathering scooping up the Miller’s Beer- he steals it.  Here we have a Black Robin Hood, i.e. Barack Obama, stealing from the elite to give to the masses.  A good Communist message.  Putting the beer back into the cases he wheels them out of the elite area over to the bleachers handing them out gratis to the bleacherites, all White. 

     The message then is that the Hope is going to steal from elite, rich Whites to give to ‘po” Whites.  The White Trash.  I hope you’re getting this.  All the White bleacher sitters have to do is sit and be patient and the Hope will gratify them beyond their avaricious dreams.  Gratis, free.

     Now, the elite are portrayed as efete, ineffective.  Their White noses and appearance are ridiculed.  They are stereotypes seen from the Black point of view.    The Black guy brushes not so much past as through some pale washed out White guy with a pointy nose who zombie like offers no resistance or objection.  Fifteen feet away the burly, solid Negro sneers back: Pardon me, Sir.  in his best sarcastic manner.  A very skinny White woman made up to look ridiculous watches passively.

     The White bleacherites are Joe the Plumber types.  They know how to party. 

     Now, depending on how you look at it this is misinformation or the dissemination of information.  The message is you have to go along to get along.  You don’t even have to get up to get down.  You shall receive without asking.

     Study the movies, shows and ads.  Hollywood has learned how to condition your responses by indirection.  They will neither command nor preach but you will go along with the program without realizing it.  You’re being hypnotized.

     Be alert, reject the message.  Above all boycott Miller’s Beer and any other product employing these methods.  Learn the technique by watching Wag The Dog.  What is effective in one set of hands is effective in another.  Stop being indignant and become persuasive.  It is all propaganda.

    

Leiber & Stoller, Wesley Yang And Rock And Roll

 

Leiber & Stoller, Wesley Yang And Rock And Roll

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/arts-and-culture/music/8898/their-magic-moment/

     In Wesley Yang’s ‘Their Magic Moment’ published by Tablet Ezine, a review of the influence of the Jewish songsters, Leiber and Stoller, Mr. Yang offers several amusing  cultural misconceptions.

     Mr. Yang himself seems to have spent too much time in Chinatown and not enough in ‘flyover’ America.  Of course, if I were writing on Chinese culture in China I’m sure I would be as amusing as Mr. Yang.  But I’m not and he is.  Actually Mr. Yang is writing in a Jewish Ezine in America and that’s my point.

     I’m astonished that Leiber and Stoller were so imersed in Jewish and Negro culture that they could so egregiously misunderstand the ‘white trash’ artist, Elvis Presley.

     I’m not sure that Elvis sang Hound Dog on the 1956 Sullivan appearance but I quote:

     In 1953, Leiber and Stoller wrote a song for Big Mama Thornton called “Hound Dog”, which became a hit on the R&B charts.  At one point during the session Leiber encourages Thornton to “attack” a certain part of the song. Thornton interrupts him, “Come here boy,” she said, motioning to me to stand even closer to her.  “I’ll tell you what you can attack.  Attack this…” she added, pointing to her crotch.”   Oh, those uninhibited Negroes, don’t you think?  The opening lyric as Thornton sang it, went like this:

You ain’t nothing but a hound dog

Quit snooping ’round my door

You can wag your tail,

But I ain’t gonna feed you anymore.”

In 1956, Elvis Presley appeared on the Ed Sullivan show singing

You ain’t nothing but a hound dog

Crying all the time

You ain’t never caught a rabbit

And you ain’t no friend of mine.”

“The song is not about a dog,: Leiber observes.

     You could have knocked me over with a feather.  Leiber somehow misunderstands Presley’s rewrite.  I mean, the great vulgarian didn’t get it.  The sexual implications of both verses are identical but Mr. Leiber is apparently so devoid of understanding of White culture he doesn’t understand.  I’m awed.

     Of course the naive would never get the sexual implications of either version.  It isn’t at all clear that the song isn’t about a dog, or, at least a type of dog.  Ronnie Self would sing: Ain’t I a dog.’ but maybe Mr. Leiber wouldn’t get that either.   Not enough odor of the Black and Jewish ghettos.

     ‘You can wag your tail’ of the L&S version is identical to ‘crying all the time’ in the Presley version.  L&S’ ‘quit snooping round my door’ is identical to the Presley line: ‘You ain’t never caught a rabbit.’  L&S ending:  ‘But I ain’t gonna feed you no more’ is identical in implication to ‘You ain’t no friend of mine.’

     Presley understood quite as clearly as its writer that the song wasn’t about a dog, you dog you, Mr. Leiber.

     My jaw dropped when I learned Leiber’s naivete about White culture.  Mr. Yang and he are both foreigners in other cultures they can imitate but not understand.

 

    

Rock And Roll Will Never Die But It Becomes Perverted

 

Rock And Roll Will Never Die But It Becomes Perverted

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.tabletmag.com/arts-and-culture/music/8898/their-magic-moment/ 

     I usually follow the ezine Tablet for a variety of interesting takes on contemporary society, of course from the Jewish point of view.

     As such Tablet unrelentingly puts down Whites, White culture and mores.  This doesn’t bother because the writers are usually Jews and of course Jews despise all things not Jewish.  In the cuurent issure (7/2/09) Tablet employs a Chinese sounding sort, Wesley Yang, to laud the Jews and put down Whites here in, as Mr. Yang puts it, ‘miscegenated America.’

     Mr. Yang’s essay is more or less a review of, or at least inspired by, the volume of Leiber and Stoller quotes entitled Hound Dog.  Leiber and Stoller entertained us vastly in the fifties.  Of course back then Jews hid their identity so no one knew Leiber and Stoller were Jewish nor would  we have cared.  We were all Americans then, not yet becoming Jews, Whites, Chinese and whatever.  It is only in the last few decades that the Jews have taught us that we’re Hound Dogs and they’re super cool, sporting an extra intelligence gene that they believe humbles the world.  Never mind that no one’s ever found it, it’s there they tell us, have faith, believe.

     Mr. Yang unselfconsciously makes some astounding comments that if made by others would indeed be blaphemous or in today’s parlance, racist.

      Mr. Yang says, and I quote:

          You needed people who could operate at the bloody crossroads where commerce, art and social change were converging.  All of which is to say that you needed Jews.

     Whether needed or not, which is open to question, we got ‘em.

     All of which is to say that according to Mr. Yang and one presumes his publishers, the editors of Tablet Magazine, is that Jews were firmly in control of the record industry  and hence by extension, American culture.  ‘What a fine mess they’ve gotten us into, hey Ollie?’  Not an astounding revelation but astounding that it was so openly revealed.  The obvious fact will immediately be contradicted if a White person makes it.  I make it, go ahead and contradict.

     Now, these Jews managed a music that Mr. Yang believes was created by ‘trashy whites.’  So if you’re White you should begin getting how the other side views you.  Nothing astounding there, either.

     I say nothing, or little, here about the Jews.  If you want a hint about the criminal side of Jewry I refer you to Gus Russo’s fabulous Supermob.  As to trashy Whites and the chinese I rather suspect there’s a little racial envy there, hey, Mr. Yang?  Anyone visiting San Francisco’s Chinatown has always been impressed by the wise old mandarins sitting behind their squalid counters selling trashy fake Chinese crap.  Buy for a dime, sell for 10.00 as authentic Chinese artefacts.  And then the Tongs.  Perhaps Mr. Yang will believe I’m referring to a large pair of tweezers but, no, I’m referring to the trashy chinese murderous criminal gangs who terrorize White, well any, merchants to extort their protection money.  Not to mention, of course, the fabled Chinese role in the drug business and people smuggling.  You can read ‘people smuggling’ as prostitution.

     Bash, bash, bash.  There’s the crux of my argument.  Mr. Yang speaking for the Chinese and in this case the Jews is hypocrisy personified.  If there were some amusing Chinese statue representing hypocrisy it would look like Mr. Yang sculpted.

     It becomes clear why the Jews and ‘minorities’ like Mr. Yang’s Chinese want anti-hate laws.  It is to indulge their own vile hatreds while gaining legal immunity.   Perhaps retaliation.  Who needs to, the truth is obvious.

 

 

AG Holder And The Slavery Question

 

AG Holder And The Slavery Question

by

R.E. Prindle

http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?id=7397

 

     Attorney General Eric Holder testifying before Congress gave a rationale for a legal double standard on the basis of ‘historic’ wrongs.  In other words these ‘historic’ wrongs are imagined to have occurred by a historic pattern of injuries from, say, only Whites to Blacks or from ,say, only heterosexuals to homosexuals; and that these wrongs committed perhaps hundreds of years ago againt people now long dead have to be revenged on living people innocent of any such wrongs perhaps also for hundreds of years.  Our Attorney General considers such new injuries ‘justice.’

     Now, it is true that Blacks were slaves to Whites but the Whites did not enslave them.  If you want to read a good eyewitness account read Mungo Park’s Travels In West Africa.  In it Park as an eyewitness estimates that 75% of  Black Africans in West Africa were slaves to the remaining 25% while the 25% were the property of the various kings or chiefs.

     Park describes corvees of Africans already enslaved being led to the coast  for a transfer of ownership from a Black African owner to a White.  These slaves were then transported to the Americas where title was merely transferred from one group of owners to another.  But the latter owners did not enslave the Africans the Africans were already slaves in Africa.  They merely continued their existence as slaves.

     Now, AG Holder is an intelligent man so he surely must undertand that while slavery is or should be a crime the onus lays with the enslaver and not any subsequent transferees.

     It therefore follows that the ‘historic’ wrong was committed by Africans who obviously share the major part of the blame.  Why then does AG Holder assert that Whites only have to be punished for acquiring these slaves who could never have been transported but by the will of their African owners.  Without African sellers there would have been no White buyers.   Is it simply a matter of money?  White Americans have it and Black Africans don’t.   Is AG Holder merely a post-racial ambulance chaser?

     AG Holder, it seems that your reasoning, even legal reasoning, is slightly awry.

Mark Oppenheimer And The Holocaust

 

Look At Me- I’m Beautiful

Mark Oppenheimer And The Holocaust

by

R.E. Prindle

 

Weber has a deep admiration for Jews- us powerful, cohesive,brilliant Jews- but it’s an admiration that could never survive actually knowing us.

-Mark Oppenheimer

http://www.tabletmag.com/news-and-politics/7721/the-denial-twist-part-iv/

     I can’t imagine who would take the holocaust seriously and that means Jews as well as gentile ‘Holocaust deniers.’  I can’t imagine who would make a fetish of the number 6,000,000.  Who can actually prove such a precise figure?   I don’t have to imagine anymore:  I’ve got Mark Oppenheimer as a living avatar.

     Mark has taken time out from what I presume is a busy life to write a four part series about ‘the leading proponents of Holocaust revisionism- leading proponents?, what fantasy is this?- Bradley Smith and Mark Weber.  I’ve actually heard of the latter proponent but not the former.

     If  Brad and Mark are obsessed with anti-Judaism Mark Oppenheimer is definitely obsessed with being Jewish as the above quote demonstrates.  If it’s a question of being crazy, which Oppenheimer seems to believe, it’s not who’s crazy but who’s craziest.

     To quote Oppenheimer:  These people are not stupid or cynical…if they scale the wall that they’ve built for themselves and look around at the world outside the playground, they might even do some good.

     Good advice that Oppenheimer might paste to his own mirror.

     Speaking of Brad M.O. says: …he was not ashamed to have lived with and loved a Jew….  C’mon, M.O., hop that wall.  For us, on the other side of the wall, the most important question is not, are you a Jew?  That’s a Jewish obsession.  If you read Jewish magazines the big question is how does Judaiism stop intermarriage.  Horrors, Mark, I’m married to a Jew.  Are you?

     The nineteenth century mythologist  and quondam lawyer, J.J. Bachofen, was always amazed that two lawyers using the same laws and the same facts could come to diametrically opposed opinions.  What holds for law apparentely according to M.O. doesn’t hold for history.  In history there can be only one opinion- Mark’s.  He quotes ‘one professor of mine’ who had worked as a ‘public historian’, whatever that is, referring to Mark Weber:

     Beware the history buff.  the buff- as opposed to the scholar, or the curious peruser, or the diletante- eats up all this knowledge but can’t properly digest.  He (most buffs seem to be male) cannot keep facts in perspective; he fails at precisely the task the scholar is good at, figuring out which facts matter most, which piece of evidence to privilege,  what facts to weigh more than what.  So a particular truth- that there are a lot of Jewish executives in Hollywood, or African-Americans commit more crimes, per capita, than (W)hites- assumes an outsized importance.  With no ability to create proper contexts for facts, the buff is in danger of becoming a conspiracy theorist or a bigot, or both.

     When I was a ranker we had a word for this sort of solipsistic thinking.  I think the initials were BS but I’m not sure if I’m remembering correctly.  What sort of proper context does the ’scholar’ create for the fact that a disproportionate by far number of executives in Hollywood are Jewish anyway?  There must be consequences.  What are they?  Can we agree on them?  Not very likely Mark.  Does our learned ‘public historian’ have a lock on creating proper contexts?  Obviously all contexts are not created equal so what makes the ‘public historian’  the judge-penitent on the issue.  Oh right, right, he has the good digestive tract that doesn’t produce you know what.

     I went to college where ‘a learned historian’ told me not to worry about the teaching which was all hokum anyway, the thing you’re here for is to learn method.  I took him at his word and went after the method, I could get the facts later.  Stupid old history buff me, hey?  Of course M. O.’s expert was probably a ‘powerful, cohesive, brilliant Jew.’  Hey, come to think about it, so was mine.  Cohen, Cohen…is that a Jewish name?

     M.O. has a PhD but he is still capable of interjecting crap like this into his essay:

One scholar (not buff mind you) of Holocaust denial told me, quoting a friend, that Holocaust deniers they “are like the shit you step on in the street- it has no relevance unless you fail to scrape it off before entering your house.”

     Oh, oh.  It wasn’t the Holocaust denial scholar who was so vulgar nor M.O., no, too much culture, he was quoting a friend and M.O. was quoting him.  Thrice removed and therefore pure.  Good technique, Mark.  ‘Look at me, I’m so beautiful.’

     If I had to choose between J.J. Bachofen and Mark Oppenheimer it would J.J. everytime.

 

A Friendly Note To Our Jewish Friends

 

A Friendly Note To Our Jewish Friends

by

 R.E. Prindle

     Hello People.  Gosh, it’s nice day isn’t it?  You know how we all cherish our Jewish roots deep in the Bible.  You know that you’re the main trunk and we’re just a graft on your Jewish tree.  That’s OK, but it’s not that we haven’t contributed our little bit to the furtherance of humanity too.  Of course our contribution was in Science and not God studies.

     History does take some unfortunate twists and turns and, say, that holocaust was sure one of ‘em.  I can see where that might unsettle a fellow a little bit but, hey, it wasn’t like you were alone in your suffering or completely innocent, if you want to be honest.

     Gosh, if you were half as provocative as you are now you must have driven those Europeans to distraction.  I am right in thinking that no holocaust happened here in America aren’t I?  I mean, golly gee, all those Holocaust ‘Museums’ you’re building designed to look like concentration camps?  Do you know how oppressive and depressive they look?  Oh, not to you of course, you were thown into such a depression that down looks like up to you.  I can understand that but, don’t you think you should seek help and let up a little?

     What I’m trying to say is that when nice, decent folks are driven to such distraction by those dam ‘Museums’ that they commit desperate acts don’t you think it’s time to reevaluate your psychology?

     Gosharoonies, you’re not alone in this country.  If you think it’s hatred don’t you think you’re generating that hatred by your indefensible psychology?  Do you really not realize what you did to bring on the European situtation back then?  I mean, you can’t reasonably attribute everything to some unreasonable ‘anti-Semites’, can you?  If just doesn’t happen that way in real life.  Every action creates a reaction.  Ask yourselves which actions of yours might have created that reaction in Europeans.

     You see the reaction you’ve created by the action of building those horrible monument to hate and crime don’t you?  You’re driving self-respecting, law abiding Americans to do things they would never otherwise do.  Multiply that one by 6,000,000 and things should become clear.

     Come on, be reasonable, bulldoze those monuments to not only Nazi hatred but to your own hatred. 

     God, wants you to be happy, work with Him.

    

    

An Extraordinary Popular Delusion

 

And Extraordinary Popular Delusion

by

R.E. Prindle

Some in clandestine companies combine;

Erect new stocks to trade beyond the line;

With air and empty names beguile the town,

And raise new credits first, then cry ‘em down,

Divide the empty nothing into shares,

And set the crowd together by the ear.

-Defoe, as quoted by Charles Mackay

 

     Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it,  or so wise men have said.  Charles Mackay as long ago as 1841 wrote a book about the follies of mankind titled:  Extraordinary Popular Delusions And The Madness Of Crowds.  He was limited to such minor absurdities as The Great Mississippi Bubble, Tulipomania and other such maniac trifles.  We ourselves can offer the absurdity of The Great Negro Delusion.

     One phenomenon of the Negro Delusion has been unfairly apportioned to the Whites of the United States while Europeans are equally at fault and that is the Great ‘Minority’ Housing Bubble in which Whites persuaded themselves that Black people with inadequate  incomes could pay back expensive mortgages simply because they were Black.

     Out of this Minority Housing Bubble arose the avatar of the Black Savior, Barack Obama.  Whites persuaded themselves that Brack Obama was capable of not only governing the United States but also able to deliver the world from all its ills.  The reason?  Well, he’s Black.  His mere skin color was imagined to be an antidote to the world’s woes.

     Nevermind that as an agent of ACORN in Chicago he had been instrumental in developing the Great Minority Housing Bubble thereby establishing the fact that he was incapable of administering the economic affairs of this Republic of Diversity, never mind that he had no qualifications other than being a ‘community organizer’.  No.  Nevermind the fact that he had no qualifications.  None.  The important thing is that he was a Negro.  Whites had convinced themselves that Black was right, White? Time for flight.

     And so it has come about that Negromania has brought about the destruction of society as we knew it.  Well, France in an almost identical situation survived the Mississippi Bubble after bankrupting themselves and I’m sure that in one form or another the world will survive the Western World’s Negromania but it will be a very different world and who knows what travails are in store for us.

     Wise men said beware but wise men were called bigots.  If being wise is being a bigot that the word must be worn as a badge of honor.  We’re not quite at post-history yet.